The posers of Dayakbaru forumers

Posted by: Empelesik Sungei

“”This whole things is to exploit the ordinary Rakyat.
Those pot calling kettle black is honourable person? What is that to be proud of when you are remain poor.Isn’t that the receiver should be thankful? If i know my vote is crucial to decide who will win i will put price to it.
Politicians are all suck**”". Changop4540
***************************

Is that really changop?

He waived in and out of arguments and seemed to triumph at every turn and twist, but as they said, “Sepandai tupai melompat, jatuh juga ke tanah.”

Check and Balance

Half the posting in this blog discussed the ineffective electoral process as a check-and-balance mechanism against corruptions and abuses. Of course BN denied that. Ming Court Incidence was proof quoted by posters here. With the benefit of the doubt, we accept that as one-off incidence.

Then Batang Ai election saw the new terminology (at least to me), the “mee segera” politics until PM Najib had to remind BN to “fulfill all election promises.”

Why in the world would PM Najib had to say that? (It reminds me of the police wearing the slogan “saya anti rasuah.”)

There is a price for votes?

Now Mr Changop confirmed and admitted that there is a price for votes. Alas he is not a spokesman for BN!!

Who is proud to be poor?

Secondly, “What is there to be proud of when you remained poor.” I pity the 4 of you, (including the Mabel sisters.) Who is proud to be poor?

That is why posters in DayakBaru here asked:

1. Why are Dayaks unequally represented in the civil service?

2. Why are government scholarships not equally available to Dayak students?

3. Why are Timber licenses given to certain individuals instead of corporation or the SEDC?

4. Why NCR-JV failed to fulfill its promises on dividends? 100 over court cases as Baru Bian mentioned, pertains to this.

5. All the other questions which I can’t remember.

These are money-question issues.

What do Dayak need?

Dayaks do not need handouts – we need to be treated with dignity, with equality, with respect. Be rich, and be rich together. Be poor and share the poverty. If that simple logic is beyond comprehension, I don’t know what else would.

Dayak question need honest answers

As I mentioned I really don’t care who is in power but if anyone utilize the customary 10% of his brain to think, there are many pointers to prove Dayaks do have legitimate grounds to ask for answers.

If the answers echoed Mabel’s and Changop’s, then we are receiving the same old rhetoric we had heard for the last 46 years.

Popularity: 38% [?]

Congratulation BN – and to Dayakbaru stay focus Written by Dr. John Brian Anthony CONGRATULATION to BN and...
Dayakbaru can be different in many ways Posted by Cikgu Iban (In response to Dayaklama) 1.”Was it...
CHANGE WITHIN DAYAKBARU Written by gkm2020 My personal opinion, Change Within DayakBaru –...
Dayakbaru are lying most of the time Posted by: Dayaklama The beauty of politics Words like dirty,...
Dayakbaru posting are irrelevant and too childish Posted by: Bintulu Voter im agree with Hishamudin1Najip1,we must look...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

July 1, 2009 · Filed Under General

Comments

9 Responses to “The posers of Dayakbaru forumers”

changop4540 on July 2nd, 2009 12:30 pm

IN Kedah DAP wants the state to be ruled again by the Barisan Nasional again.It clear Pakatan failed to walk the talk when it demolished the abbatoir. When taking over the state administration later on PR may not allowed pig to be slaugthered in the longhouse. So what is your take Dayakbaru? I earnstly hope Dayaks can agree to initial “CHANGES” through BN.
Iban Abroad on July 2nd, 2009 2:22 pm

Who should lead PKR Sarawak ? VOTE for DAYAKBARU

Mr. Seliong ak. Wau (36%, 29 Votes)
Mr. CharcoalArt (35%,28 Votes)
Mr. Meramat Tajak (33%, 26 Votes)
YB Dominique Ng (29%, 22 Votes)
Mr Granda Aing (16%, 12 Votes)
Mr Baru Bian (12%, 9 Votes)
YB Gabriel Adit (10%, 8 Votes)
None Of Above (8%, 6 Votes)
Mr Nicholas Bawin (8%, 6 Votes)
Dr John Brian Anthony (5%, 4 Votes)
Dr Michael Teo (5%, 4 Votes)
Mr Augustine Liom (4%, 3 Votes)
Mustaffa Kamil Ayub (4%, 3 Votes)
Hj Baharuddin Moksen (3%, 2 Votes)
Mr Jimmy Donald (1%, 1 Votes)
En Wan Zainal Wan Sanusi (1%, 1 Votes)
Mr Jawah Gerang (-6%
Gerakan Kongress Dayak Malaysia on July 2nd, 2009 2:36 pm

Im’ vote for dayakbaru
Mabel Rachel Maria on July 2nd, 2009 5:41 pm

Just keep the present BN govt.Most of us have seen the track record of BN in the past.There ain’t so bad.

What assurance or barometer that you can show us that the Pakatan Rakyat are much better than BN.

For the 46 years we have been progress well under the BN although we must admit a little bit slow. But it seems all right to the most of the rakyat.(Barometer to measure, through every general election BN won with handsome majority).

And all must remember “Rom was not build in one day”.

Well folks, we want to us, is there anything wrong with the CM’s Slogan ” Politik Pembangunan Untuk Semua Rakyat?”

With that shall we, or shall we all say “Keep the present BN for the continuous development to our beloved land for the next 50 years maybe!”

Thanks you,
We, Mabel,Rachel & Maria.
Iban Ulu on July 2nd, 2009 6:07 pm

I support opposition, vote BN out.
Taju Remaong on July 2nd, 2009 10:43 pm

Mabel Rachel Maria

BN proven slow in bringing developement to Sarawak, especially to Dayak.You know why?. Most of the YBs are corrupt and only fill thier own pocket instead of help those poor Dayak. Why are you still want them ?.You are very comfortable and not dare to change.Nyangka kita tiga sama ampit enggau sida BN yBs ngena fund rakyat kena ngisi kandi diri empu “buya taju remaong”.
Keruak Tau Tepang on July 3rd, 2009 7:46 am

Let us keep the present CM for the rest of his life as our CM. At the moment, there is no one who is capable of replacing him as our CM. Apin penoh lumpit iya nya, Unggal.
tudip@too deep on July 5th, 2009 10:54 am

Empelesik sungei,
“Dayaks do not need handouts – we need to be treated with dignity, with equality, with respect. Be rich, and be rich together. Be poor and share the poverty.”

To share the wealth of the country with fairness and equal, in one aspect it is more to communism. Communism is a fail ideology.

Do you realised that our country practised democracy with capitalism? The rich will get richer and the poor will always stay poor subject to competitiveness and ’survival of the fittest’.

Pure Democracy, Capitalist Democracy or Commninist Democracy?
Which one you choose?

You let us know.

But I predict that Capitalism is going to fail sooner or later, which in one way or another is going to fail democracy.

Whats next…..
Ijauberani on July 14th, 2009 2:21 pm

Yes aku setuju enggau sebut deh keruak Tau Tepang. Abis tanah kitai dayak udah di rampas ia enggau bala koloni ya ( termasuk Menteri kitai dayak ti jadi kerbau ya ) ngena seksyen 47 land ordinance s’wak. Nyabak tudah tuai tanah lain ulih diambi ya tang tanah kubur di samariang enda ulih diambi ya.