The Policies of Pakatan Rakyat (D)
Posted by Dr. John Brian Anthony
4. Federal-State Relationship and Foreign Policy
A. The Federal System
The rights of states to make decisions according to their own requirement on development strategy must be respected. The foundation of this right is an adequate financial allocation to states that is based on their contribution to the Federation and the people’s needs.
Pakatan Rakyat will:
i. Guarantee to the state governments, a royalty of 20% from petroleum income with an aim to eradicate poverty.
ii. Return part of the tax collection from each state based on an equitable distribution.
iii. Increase the capitation grants for states.
B. Sabah and Sarawak
The spirit of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 will form the foundation for a just relationship between the Federation and Sabah & Sarawak. By restoring the balance of power that has been concentrated with the central government, Pakatan Rakyat promises to make a fair and open assessment of the principal issues that are preventing political and socio-economic progress in both states in East Malaysia.
Pakatan Rakyat will:
i. Guarantee Sabah and Sarawak’s wealth are enjoyed fully by their people by the provision of 20% royalty from their petroleum income.
ii. Set up a Royal Commission to find the best resolution of the immigrant issue.
iii. Guarantee the Native Customary Land Rights are not violated by any party.
iv. Stop immediately the oppression against those living in the interior areas caused by unethical economic activities.
C. Foreign Policy
Malaysia’s leadership among nation-states of the world must be enhanced. It is our aim frame a foreign policy based on the universal principles of justice, resolution through negotiations and inter-civilisational dialogues for security, peace and prosperity.
Pakatan Rakyat will:
i. Protect national interests by becoming a responsible member of the world by respecting fundamental rights, democratic principles and upholding understandings, agreements, declarations and international law, in line with principles of justice.
ii. Active in leading inter-civilisational dialogues.
iii. Strengthen diplomatic and international trade cooperation with regional partners especially ASEAN members.
iv. Further strengthen Malaysia’s role in international organisations.
The End
Popularity: 16% [?]
Related posts:
- The Policies of Pakatan Rakyat (A) Posted by Dr. John Brian Anthony As the Policies are...
- The policies of Pakatan Rakyat (B) Posted by Dr. John Brian Anthony 2. Driving a...
- The Policies of Pakatan Rakyat (C) Posted by Dr. John Brian Anthony 3. Social Justice and...
- Pakatan Rakyat as the Alternative Government in Sarawak Written by Dr. John Brian Anthony An Alternative Government for...
- Pakatan Rakyat proves its mettle Taken from Malaysian Today During troubling times such as these...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Comments
34 Responses to “The Policies of Pakatan Rakyat (D)”
Leave a Reply
-
-
-
Total Hits
-
- "JAKSA PENDAMAI" MINTA HERALD MUAI "ALLAH"? (258)
- IbanImmigrant - Dayakbaru accept your Challenge (236)
- 1MALAYSIA - IS "ALLAH" EXCLUSIVE TO ISLAM? (215)
- Masing kritik penulis blog dakwa Dayak tidak berguna (191)
- SKIM MUNOH RAYAT (143)
- SIB CHURCH ATTACK – SEREMBAN No.13? (141)
- Jako Jabu tekelalu bula (139)
- "BN has money - PR talk only." (139)
- SMS ex-pengajar ngagai Johnny anak Chuat (131)
- Batang Ai Independent Candidate - Ruaikitai Community Portal Owner (127)
Inspirational word from gkm2020
1) Pakatan Rakyat (PR), which comprised Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), DAP and PAS, had not been registered as a political party. I don’t think its possible considering the different ideology. BN as a registered entity, hence had the advantage.
2) No……The state Pakatan has yet to be formed officially because one component party insists that the issue of seat allocation be settled before they can talk about operating from a common structure. Believed me, Sarawak DAP is not keen to be part of Pakatan.
3) At the moment, we see only a fragmented truncated and often imploded opposition alliance stumbling along without a united sense of purpose. As it is now, the PR is unlikely to dethrone the BN from its Putrajaya stronghold.
4) Right now, the Pakatan coalition is held together by their marriage of convenience. As we all know, in any marriage, be it out of love or convenience, you need to make compromise for the marriage to work.
5) The dayaks would continue to support BN in the state polls regardless, as seen in Batang Ai.
How about the lucrative logging industry, Dr.? What to do with existing licences? How about the revenue from it? Will the state set up a foundation to harness the value and give back the money to the people?
What alternative development model for the NCR land which give more return to the owners of the land instead of the developers?
If PR wins Swak, will the current PKR chief who is a Dayak become the CM?
If DAP happens to win more DUN seats than PKR, will a Chinese become Swak CM?
Can a Non-Muslim become the TYT for Sbh & Swak?
When the direction has been set, it is easier to bring the parts together.
Telaga Kumang observation of fact is interesting because it is the nature of politics that it can change very quickly. Almost anything is a possibility. Who would predict that Selangor and Federal Territory would fall to the Pakatan Rakyat before March 08 election.
All evidence say “cannot”. The biggest business, money spinner, high calibre leaders, rich UMNO etc
So I cannot depended too much in history but it is good for reference in our thinking.
But then who am I to say?
Any land development model must include the land owner active and meaningful participation.
Much has been said on this and suffice to say that the key areas are:
1. Land Title issuance
2. Share Certificate issuance
3. Personal agreement vis a vis Blanket agreement now
4. agreement must be fair to both parties
5. management and staffing across the board must have meaning participation
6. Should have monitoring authority on performance ( small shareholder watchdog team)
7. Direct agreement – no LCDA / SALCRA
8. Prioritize CSR – measurable and sustainanble community and commerce development programmes
9. Duration limited to 25 years vs 60 now.
10.Land Title guaranteed to be given back after the venture
This is a window dressing by PR just to attract the rakyat. Their policies is no better than the BN. What is special treatment given to Sarawak and Sabah?
Its never mention that Sarawak and Sabah should be govern by majority rule.
Who is responsible to disburse the 20% oil/gas money from the royalty?
How this will directly can alleviate the living standard of the poor people of Sabah and Sarawak.
How many full ministers/ deputy ministers shall be from Sarawak and Sabah in the federal Gomen?
What is the specific policy concerning the already taken/grap NCR land as accused by the opposition? If JV was claimed not benefitted the NCR owner and what remedial approach that PR will take to help the poor?
How can Dr.John become the CM if he is not belong/or member of any political party?
What PR said is mostly concerning the National policy agenda. Can Dr.John come with his blue print of change since he is interested to be the CM.
As the CM Dr.John will able to give us the closer picture what he will do ( policies )with the state of Sarawak. Will he not follow the step of Pehin Sri?
If Dr.John does not believe in politic of development in helping to modernise Sarawak. What policy approach that he will take?
Lastly will Sarawak develop under the CMship of the Dayak?
Dr. John Brian Anthony on December 20th, 2009 10:09 pm
Any land development model must include the land owner active and meaningful participation.
Much has been said on this and suffice to say that the key areas are:
1. Land Title issuance-
Temuda or state land?how to confirm that lands are really temuda before issuance of land title.
9. Duration limited to 25 years vs 60 now
-why not to issue 1000 years title for all temuda lands if there is any more temudas nowadays.Forest Reserve areas pun dah habis di curi kayu.
Changop 4540: I have many types of print and colours too. Everything has its season.
I agree that one cannot become a CM without a party. I think that can be fixed easily.
Follow Pehin Sri – NOPE! That is sure HELL! Being cursed everyday by the people.
So as not to keep you guessing for too long Changop – I will use Sustainable Development with the involvement of all stack holders in my approach to develop Sarawak.
Politics of Development to rob from the State and grab what belong to the people to give to wealthy people – a BIG NO! NO!.
Changop – DO NOT EVER THINK THAT DAYAK IS INCAPABLE OF looking after Sarawak. That would be your biggest mistakes to under estimate Dayakbaru.
Dayak with “Cawat Mentality” will have problems – that I agree.
We are ALL Anak Malaysia – we can make things work by working together to build a nation based on rule of law and fairness to all.
Lutor,
Quite often in your comment you contradicted yourself depending on the tide, obviously.Earlier you were complaining about the new Rajah and Yangdikisahi overstay his welcome and BN holding own to power for far too long…but now now, now you are saying “the nature of politics that it can change very quickly. Almost anything is a possibility”.
So if you think politic is fluid and can change very quickly…in the event it don’t change(to your liking), BN continue to helm the state political you should also readily accept it. NOT just according to your “desired” changes.
Merry X’mas!!!!!!
Your dream is to become CM while mine is to become TYT. While I readily admitted that I can never be one coz I am not a muslim, you still insist that you can still realise your dream depite being partyless.
Thinking that you can “fixed” it easily is dangerous presidence…it will lead to choatic situation. Are you not in the state of confusion? After having obtained your doctorate from Confussion Uni.?
changop4540, JS and Telaga Kumang,
It is obvious that you are not interested to be part of Dayakbaru discussion, reading from your comments. You are more interested to paint a picture of who and what is Dr John Brian.
Are you interested in Dayak issues?
No, as your comments showed that you are more interested to hurl endless accusations at Dr John and praise the mighty Sarawak’s White Crocodile and its clan.
Is a blog owner responsible to implement policies and monitor its success?
No, that the job of politicians and the State Government Office bearers. As a blog owner, the blogger pens whatever crazy ideas that he has on his blog and allows viewers to comment on his ideas.
Is it Dayakbaru a threat to Dayak?
Maybe. If you are a politician or interested personnel who has been gaining riches by robbing your own mother land. Also if you have been ’selling out’ your own kind for your own gain. Then the answer is yes, Dayakbaru is a threat. If you are a person who believes that everyone has equal opportunity to voice their opinions and issues that affect their daily life, then the answer is no. Depending on what’s your motive and intention, Dayakbaru blog either send shivers down your spine, or it brings tireless effort to change the way Dayak lives now.
Are you happy to see the high poverty level of the mass of your Dayak fellas vs the nearly-god-king-like bottomless richness of very few of your Dayak fellas?
Maybe. If you’re a person who worships richness and enjoys to be treated with near-God, the Saviour, the One, then you’ll be happy. If you’re a person with high degree of compassion and empathy, you can’t stomach in what you see around you, not without doing something about it. Doing something about it doesn’t mean you must have the wealth and must organize events to showcase your good cause. Doing something about it means you do whatever that you think will affect the people, no matter how small it is. Be it educating through writing, participating in discussions, or even as small as making RM1 contribution to a cause that is in line with your values system.
Are you all paid or instructed to write specific type of comments on this blog?
My answer will be Yes, because no other Dayakbaru readers who has been more persistent and consistent than you guys, especially within the last 7 days. Why? you guys will take line by line of the content, and posed a personal challenge the blog owner about it, instead of penning your ideas pertaining to the topic posted or contribute to the topic or giving more information about the topic. You would also bring in a lot of political strategy into your comments, such as linking the blog owner to positions in the you-named-as-you-like party, digging into the past etc. Evidently, it is an all out war, intentionally and maliciously, to discredit the blog owner. All the evidences showed that you’re not interested in the Dayakbaru discussions. It is so glaring obvious that you only have one objective in your comments, that is to discourage the discussion of Dayakbaru issues and paint a public perception of who is the almighty Saviour of the Dayak nation.
Are alternatives to the present situation scary?
Bladdy yes, because it means stepping into an unknown territory, unchartered water, uncertain future. Who will be the most scared person? All the people who doesn’t want the present situation to change. Then I’ll ask why these people don’t want change? Before I can answer that, I have to ask these questions. Does the people who are living in poor condition wants change that will bring better living condition to them? Yes, that’s the voice of 70% of the Dayak population, because it means life will be easier, with more resources and an upgrade to the present living condition. That leaves 30% of Dayak who know, are making decent living. Out of this 30%. how many doesn’t want the change? 5%? 10%? Wait a minute, 70% wants change, that’s a big number. And a small fraction doesn’t want. Why? Power, of course. Having power means you can dictate environment to the way you want it to be. Anything that you don’t like because it doesn’t fit you, with power, you can change it to fit you. So, these are the people who doesn’t want change.
Should everyone discuss about politics?
Yes, because policies and implementation of policies that has bee coined/proposed by the politicians affects my daily life. What’s politics? It’s a process of decision-making that affects my life. If you choose not to participate in discussions that affects your life, that means you are surrendering your life to others. Is that what you want? GST affects you, petrol price affects you, education affects your children, land title affects you and the list goes on. Meaning to say, policies proposed by the policy-makers affects all of us, down to the most fundamental aspects of our life. Am I going to watch helplessly, someone else, dictates my life? No way, because I’m not helpless. I’m take charge of my life.
Dayakbaru readers, have a week ahead, and Merry Christmas.
Cina Chantung,
What has come out positive of Dayakbaru discussion to date, if I may ask.? Do you fancy endless discussion with no result/outcome? Your type of “discussion” until etenity I am afraid will not solve Dayak predicament.
Deo,
Is Dayak predicament to be solved by blog owner?
No, Dayak predicament is not to be solved by blog owner nor you and me. Dayak predicament is to be solved by the Dayak itself, who will learn through the analysis of issues, which is supposed to be done by good newspaper and good radio station or good television programme or any good media. Dayak politicians can provide the policies and directions, the real solutions are to be made happen by the individual Dayak. Meaning to say, Dayak predicament can’t be solved by the politicians neither. If it can be done by the politicians, then today, Dayak don’t have predicaments. The power to change lies with the people, not the politicians. That gives rise to the next question, how do I learn what to do?
In Malaysia, analysis of issues and happenings don’t happen. All you get from the newspaper and radio (which covers the widest audience) is just announcements. Read the newspaper today, yesterday, a year ago, tomorrow and next year, and tell me, if there are any neutral analysis provided. No, there are none. It is full of announcements. PM says this, Taib says this. And Malaysia has become a nation where there are no more thinking. Just say, and the people will do and change. Just say and things will happen. The are no analysis of anything to give the right to think to the people. E.g. PM said, Malaysia is 1Malaysia, and he expects Malaysian will behave in that manner. There are no follow-up in the newspaper nor radio to breakdown and discuss the implications, issues of 1Malaysia. All approved media doesn’t gives you discussions to allow you to understand what to do.
So, is there a difference between Dayakbaru blog and political talks/statements?
Maybe. If you view Dayakbaru topics as just another article written by the blog owner to kill his free time, then there is no difference. Because all politicians in Malaysia also talk a lot. Look at how much time and resources are spent on inquiries e.g. V.K. Lingam, Teoh Beng Hock, PKFZ and no action. The trend is very simple, anything that happens, such as massive landslide, abuse of power, misappropriation of funds, the way to deal with it is to set up a committee (whatever they want to call it), put up a show and follow by inaction. Full stop.
If you read and learn the thinking presented by the Dayakbaru writers, then the answer is yes, there is a difference. Because Dayakbaru teach you how to think, what to think about, and why you should think about it. Why should Dayakbaru take all the time and trouble to do so? Because Dayakbaru believe in education. All the discussion presented are part of education. Education need NOT have to be formal. Education comes in many forms. This blog is a strong advocate of learning. What sort of learning? Not ABCs obviously, it is to learn how to think.
So, is Dayakbaru a waste of time?
No, because Dayakbaru gives analysis that in turn, empowers the readers to acquire the parts to think. And this results in the decisions in the hand of the readers. Dayakbaru blog owner and readers do not belong to the group that is incapable of thinking. This is the group of people who has acquire the highest level of thinking, to be able to breakdown issues into its parts, present its implications, present arguments, justify their opinions with evidences. Readers learn to think by reading and reflecting their writing. Readers copy their thinking and becomes a thinking person.
Is Malaysia a literate country?
I have to answer No. Malaysia has become a nation that is capable of reading and writing and it stops just there. Malaysia has lost its capability in understanding what they are reading because Malaysia no longer understand context. Everyday I have good laugh at our newspapers because newspapers today are good source of jokes. Saves me money from buying books on jokes.
Jokes are aplenty in Malaysian’s newspaper. Contradicting statements e.g. GST doesnt’ add extra burden to rakyat – I rolled on the floor laughing because Malaysians could read and stomach in those stuff. GST means everything cost more for you and me, and here the Government says no extra burden whilst the starting salary of a fresh graduates remain at $1500 for the part 15 years! Prices of daily essential becomes higher and higher everyday, but salary remains the same. Newspaper doesn’t discuss about how the Government plan to spend the GST, how it will impact you and me, nor did they discuss what are the other sources of revenue for the Govt. Newspaper doesn’t discuss about how effective has the money taxed from the rakyat been spent to benefit the rakyat. Read the newspaper today and tell me how many pages of announcements vs analysis are there.
Is there an alternative in the absence of thinking in our media?
Yes, the blogs. Read the blogs and you’ll find analysis of issues, happenings etc. Why? Because these people can think, as simple as that.
Deo, write some analysis for us to read and Dayakbaru participate in discussing your ideas. Show that you belong to the society that has thinking capabilities.
Cina Chantung,
As I said I do not fancy or normally engage on unnecessary lengthy debate…..you are being invasive by refusing to name or quote instances where Dayakbaru discussion yielded positive result/outcome that deserved some mention.
Whether a result is +ve/-ve can still be debated. I for one am thankful to DB for bringing forth issues/problems that I always take for granted or don’t care about. Maybe a “+ve” result from all these is that I demand more from my MPs! I don’t need a stupid or a balless MP (lady MP excluded, of course) to represent my beautiful Sarawak. I need an MP who have high integrity and courage. Enough is enough!
Deo,what do you want? Obviously you dislike DB.So,just stay away.
With the advent of DB in blogging, personally I am now more aware of my rights as a native Sarawakian.If Deo doesn’t get no thing from DB,then DB is useless to you.Either way, DB don’t need you.Can you see that?
I think we need a bid crowd in DB with different views. So those who question some ideas in DB should not be pushed away. Dr. John, some of your fans here seem to be unwelcoming to opposing views.
If anybody read Nelson Mandala’s book, he said while I hate apartheid, I’m not prepared to drive those white into the sea. In fact, he learns about his enemy, his language, their culture, their thinking etc.
I thought matured men would accept criticisms claimly and gladly.
Attn: Cina Chantung & Ugly Msian
I suggest you two as the great fans and supporters of Dr. John to read the Nelson Mandela’s book to learn his struggle against the apartheid. Lots of lessons learnt there.
For example, are you guys prepared to go for arm struggles if needs be to achieve your dreamed changes that you want as did the ANC arm wing Umkhonto de …..?
Tabi Kaban Blogger,
The dayak people will be left out if we do not work with the bigger friends like the Malays and the Chinese in Malaysia.
The Federal govt knows very well the dayak were left behind in most sectors, and that is why the new policy 1Malaysia is just implemented.
With the policy laid out, the dayak is given oppurtunity to voices their grievance through proper BN channel. A lot of matters can be resolved through this manner. Lately the issue of bumiputra status have been solved for the children of mixed parentage with bumi.
As for DB, their vision and mission is too blur and too far from reality. Most of their complain are just like a small kid complain asking for better toy. What a pity.
So, please join BN for real political outlook for the Dayak Course.
Nya aja wai sulu.
Telaga, you seems to be the outright BN supporter instead of discussing pros & cons of Dayak issues.
What is the solution for the mixed marriage children?
I think DB raises some important issues mwhich are the consequences of the current BN policy eg. the NCR land. The current Swak BN does not appear to manage this NCR issues well.What financial profits does the Dayaks get from their NCR lands which are developed for plantations?
What is the percentage of Dayak studenst getting scholarship from Yayasan Swak compared to Malays? Do you know the statistics since you are the BN supporter?
How many logging licences are given to Dayaks?
How many businesses are owned by Dayaks?
In Swak civil service, what is the statistics according to races? What is the percentage of Dayaks in there?
Telaga Kmg, will the next Swak CM be a Dayak since Malay/Melanau have dominated it for the last 25 years plus? Will the Malay/Melanau makes way for a Dayak to be the next CM?
ORANG KA JAI ATI NGAGAI BANGSA DIRI EMPU TAU DI KUMBAI “IBAN BANCHAT”.
ORANG KA JAI TU,ENDANG NADAI ATI DEKA NULONG KABAN IBAN BA MENOA BUKAI KELIMPAH ARI MENOA YA EMPU.
APA AGI KA NGAMAJU KA BANGSA DIRI EMPU.
JAUH PAWI…..
IDUP PKR……
Let’s dissect Mr Telaga Kumang’s @ person from PBB comments
“1) Pakatan Rakyat (PR), which comprised Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), DAP and PAS, had not been registered as a political party. I don’t think its possible considering the different ideology. BN as a registered entity, hence had the advantage.”
Mr Telaga Kumang is a fortune teller. He can actually predict the future that PR will not work. Why not you try to predict the 4D number and get rich?
“2) No……The state Pakatan has yet to be formed officially because one component party insists that the issue of seat allocation be settled before they can talk about operating from a common structure. Believed me, Sarawak DAP is not keen to be part of Pakatan.”
Now Telaga Kumang has me confused. Is he from the DAP? Can he say that Sarawak DAP is not keen to join PR? If this is true I can also start to claim things like, UMNO is about to take over Sarawak.
“3) At the moment, we see only a fragmented truncated and often imploded opposition alliance stumbling along without a united sense of purpose. As it is now, the PR is unlikely to dethrone the BN from its Putrajaya stronghold.”
Ah Mr Telaga Kumang, trying to impress with his command of the English Language, Imploded is in the past tense and if PR is still around it means that is has not “imploded”. Also truncated means cut short, has any members of PR been kicked out? My my Mr Telaga Kumang maybe you need to go for some remedial English classes before coming back here.
Ah fortune telling again, “PR is unlikely to dethrone the BN”, well well well, 4D numbers anyone?
“4) Right now, the Pakatan coalition is held together by their marriage of convenience. As we all know, in any marriage, be it out of love or convenience, you need to make compromise for the marriage to work.”
My my such outdated thought, now it is all about Win-Win, not compromising. In a marriage both parties gain.
“5) The dayaks would continue to support BN in the state polls regardless, as seen in Batang Ai.”
Ah future continuous tense, which means Fortune telling again. Aiyah, go and buy your 4D numbers and get rich lah!
If Mr Deo says that DB only talks, what about this fabulous statement.
“The Federal govt knows very well the dayak were left behind in most sectors, and that is why the new policy 1Malaysia is just implemented.”
If only Mr Telaga Kumang can tell me what is the 1Malaysia policy is about. In fact thereis no such “Policy” The NEP is policy! 1Malaysia is not a policy! No such act called 1Malaysia has been gazetted and no such rules has been passed! Hey Mr Telaga Kumang, please quickly go for your English remedial class and learn about the meaning of the word “Policy”
“With the policy laid out, the dayak is given oppurtunity to voices their grievance through proper BN channel.” Again referencing to a non-existent policy. Maybe he should also go and see a psychiatrist for seeing things that are not there.
“A lot of matters can be resolved through this manner. Lately the issue of bumiputra status have been solved for the children of mixed parentage with bumi.” I wonder which government was responsible in the first place for this issue. And by the way is has not been solved. I have not seen any changes to the laws yet about this. What has been done was merely a statement but not laws that are amended or gazetted!
“As for DB, their vision and mission is too blur and too far from reality. Most of their complain are just like a small kid complain asking for better toy. What a pity.” Well, well. well. Mr Telaga Kumang the compassionate one, pity indeed. Trying to use analogy ah. Good attempt but do you really know how to use analogies? Let me teach you, “Like small kid complain asking for better toy” Are you trying to compare asking for basic rights as defined in the constitution as a better toy? “Small kid”? The very fact that you and your PBB friends are now attacking this site is proof that it is not a small kid.
“So, please join BN for real political outlook for the Dayak Course.” and what is this real” political outlook” Once again empty slogans just like your master’s 1Malaysia
Ah Mr JS,
You seem to know about apartheid and therefore do you know what is apartheid? It is a set of rules and policies by the government that discriminates against one race. And therefore do we have rules and policies in Malaysia that discriminates against certain races in Malaysia? Oh yes we do. So MR JS are you advocating violence because of this injustice? It seems that you agree that there is apartheid in Malaysia.
CC
I don’t say there is apartheid in Msia but I said there are a lot of lessons learnt in the book by Mandela.
So it sounds that you won’t pratice agi idup agi ngelaban to your last drop of blood like Rentap.
It seems you don’t acccept criticisms and questions well when you attention to me. You said it’s personal attack to this blog.
My response to T Kumangs’s post:
1.BN always misuse government’s machinery during election time.I’ve seen things. Remember Muhyiddin Yassin using TUDM copter in Sabah to attend an UMNO function?
Corrupted…as long as UMNO remain as big brother.Now they want UMNO to control Penang from GERAKAN.You think you can stand Ahmad Ismail?
2.I don’t think DAP is joining BN.Instead DAP is fighting BN all this while.I can also predict that Malayan Dayak Council, will rule Malaysia once registered. But alas, the ROS is corrupted by BN people…To me it is fair enough as long as DAP don’t join BN. By being Pakatan friendly is good enough for DAP to overthrow the present Swak gomen.Look at what happened in Perak?
3.Do not be so arrogant. The Malays themselves are divided.MIC,MCA are weak.In Sarawak,the white hair regime is about to end.You think abang Joe or your YDK will laugh if King Solomon takes over from his dad, right under YDK’s and abang Joe’s nose?
4. Yeah,yeah.Election boundary were set in such a way to maximise BN’s advantage. How many seats are under Malays majority exactly? Do we hear PBB claiming the most seats as theirs? The worst part, dayaks majority seats are given to SUPP.Can I call this a marriage of convenience? For 46 years Dayaks has been married inconveniently to SUPP. I cannot imagine James Masing and Mawan conveniently swapping any seat with SUPP just to accomodate Larry Sng.Seriously, it is more convenient if YDK revolt and take over as chief minister of Sarawak soon, after all.BTW,now is not very convenient for SPDP and PRS to merge because Masing will adamantly insist being the leader of the coalition/ merger. For convenience sake, forget about the proposed merger, which are just mere propaganda.
5.This statement has serious connotations.It may means Dayaks are stupid to keep voting BN.Or it may means you love Dayaks to maintain their ‘chawat’ mentality. Or you are looking down on the general Dayak voters…what else can I say.Do you mean I enjoy voting SUPP in elections? Hell…no!
Just my predictions and imaginations.
Changop4540 said:
This is a window dressing by PR just to attract the rakyat. Their policies is no better than the BN. What is special treatment given to Sarawak and Sabah?
–Doesn’t mean to be special. Enough to stop what BN pissed lied after 50 years.
Its never mention that Sarawak and Sabah should be govern by majority rule.
Who is responsible to disburse the 20% oil/gas money from the royalty?
–Equally not to mention the truth that minority rule by Yang Dikashi clans leaving 95 percent oil money to UMNO would be a very responsible act indeed for the blind BN Dayak leaders against the majority Dayak plus Chinese Sarawakians.
How this will directly can alleviate the living standard of the poor people of Sabah and Sarawak.
–How brainless and hollow it may sound to help Bumiputera when BN actually feeding own Cronyputera all these while. Huh!
How many full ministers/ deputy ministers shall be from Sarawak and Sabah in the federal Gomen?
–Filling the numbers would be a fake meaning of ministership like BN did now. Your priority of governance is false, typical BN style.
What is the specific policy concerning the already taken/grap NCR land as accused by the opposition? If JV was claimed not benefitted the NCR owner and what remedial approach that PR will take to help the poor?
–Let’s Chase Dayaks Away (LCDA) just to give Such A Low Crappy Returns Annually(SALCRA) shows clearly a lopsided plantation development policy. The same goons that oversee land development are the real crooks controlling over 70 percent plantation money. FEW crooks reaps wealth against THOUSANDS of poor Dayaks. This is BN’s Politic of Development at utmost self-explain crookmanship yeah?
How can Dr.John become the CM if he is not belong/or member of any political party?
–And also you forgot that BN itself did the same trick appointing back-door mediocre ministers via Senatorship.
What PR said is mostly concerning the National policy agenda. Can Dr.John come with his blue print of change since he is interested to be the CM.
–Unless you’re still a virgin enough, wouldn’t you yourself then?
As the CM Dr.John will able to give us the closer picture what he will do ( policies )with the state of Sarawak. Will he not follow the step of Pehin Sri?
–First step would be not be following what Yang Dikasihi self-serving steps so far.
If Dr.John does not believe in politic of development in helping to modernise Sarawak. What policy approach that he will take?
–Exactly, for not turning development as politics items to be delayed like keeping wine, the older the higher value for coming elections which is wrong. Development is human rights, deliver accordingly without delay.
Lastly will Sarawak develop under the CMship of the Dayak?
–Unless being back-stabbed by fellow fickle-minded Dayak (eg.like you Changop). Kalong Ningkan is a Dayak tragedy and there goes the missed opportunity for Sarawak independence. All remote-buttoned by far from UMNO just like that eversince. The same Dayaks that preach BN all along are the same crooks looting own Dayaks now.
And now the rest of Sarawakians (be it level-thinking Dayaks Chinese Malays) made the collateral damage under BN.
Instead of throwing your Changop piss here better open up your blog pro BN as you like and see if you can get same hits like here. Maybe Dayak Lama blog to group your BN gang bang. Be as gentlemen as you can if you believe in rules of engagement – never fire unless attacked upon.
So Changop and Dayaklama goons, set up Dayak Lama blog as soonest. We shall wait, so for now stop justifying BN crooked leadership. It’s looks silly by the day justifying falsehood against the rest of Malaysians. Who are you to stop the ‘Change’ anyway.
It’ll be an equal two-party view to choose: Dayak Baru or Dayak Lama blog. New dynamics or Old antiquities. Freedom thinkers or Repressive eunuchs. Guided liberation or Oppressed tyranny. Conscience or Falsehood. Dinasti Rakyat or Dinasti Rajah Yang Dikasihi.
You with us Dayaks or You with Yang Dikasihi.
Dyaks, I don’t agree with your suggestion to chase away the opposing views here ie. the BN=pro views. It won’t be disccusiion here without the protoganists. Just like in the wayang mesti bisi hero and lawan, baru bisi cerita.
Let’s the BN supporters present their views and we counterback. That’s sit! Nelson Mandela nevers dare to drive his opponents because at the end of the day, he regarded them as brothers and sisters with different colours. In this blog, brothers and sisters with diferent views.
Dyaks, you have counterbacked Changop’s comments well! All his questions are answered I guess.
Imanagine if Swak is independent now. What would it be now?
Tabi Kaban Blogger (attn JS),
Selamat Hari Xmas.
Nama kaban kitai JS nadai ari enjoy xmas. Ba blog tu semina comment ia aja beturut2 tiap jam, tang orang lain enjoy xmas. Anang kelalu bakanya bakih. Maia WW1 &WW2 semua orang ngetu enda lama beperang leboh xmas. Tu lah maia kitai enjoy xmas.
Nya aja kaban
cina chantung,telaga kumang-Au amat balat comment seduai di chak,engka seduai tu endang sigi urang makai duit ba BN serta bisi shear nerumpak tanah NCR rakyak ngelama tu chak,bala kitai rakyak udah puah ngasai ke di pegai BN nyau bepuluh2 taun ke udah.ia nama kebuah kitai enda tau muai BN dih,aku arap PKR ulih nukar BN kaban next election. IDUP PKR I supported DAYAK BARU BELOGGER ALWAY,