SKIM MUNOH RAYAT

Written by gkm2020

Updated: 12/03/2010 , 5:24PM

Nuju Endu Telaga Kumang and honorable DB readers,

My Personal Opinions:

The current BN Sarawak New NCR Land Development Concept is a “BOGUS” scheme!

DB will support any form of development and/or Joint-Venture (JV) if it’s transparent, accountable, equitable, producing strategic benefits, competitiveness and on “winning all basis” (all must wins structure) of business cooperation.

SKIM MUNOH RAYAT – LAND IS LIFE!

Frankly speaking, 60 years ‘leasehold model’ is too long for an Native Customary Rights Land JVC model as it often create greater corporate risk exposures. The current NCR 60/10/30 equity structures are fragile and high risk too.

The BN government policies on Land Code and JV model have been written and improvised to suit their needs and wants, and also with many agenda behind (bundles with long-term strategic power sharing and systematic alienation scheme). Yet, lacks of financial accountability, governing transparency and CSR policies. We can actually called it as “SKIM MAKAI RAYAT” or “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT”.

Notes: “Munoh” herein mean tried to kill off such community-business venture and an indirect effort to systematically alienated NCR lands from the Dayak. Land is my Life – Land is my Heritage – Land is my Native Rights – Land is my Liberty; and it is better to kill me than to move and marginalize me and my next generation. Rakyat today are no longer blind and/or naive. Tanah Adat is Pesaka Iban/Dayak. The current NCR Land Development Scheme has many loopholes and seen to have a different agenda to indirectly taking away the rights of the natives to manage their own lands in the JV model. Currently we have more than 100 legal cases pending and/or on going against this JV Scheme. Why? I presume you may have some ‘denialable’ answer(s) to all these issues.

Unbecoming “YB brokers” integrity

In addition, a failure to JV process and/or sustainability is not due to a corrupt JV brokers, who often misled the two parties (investor and landowners) that participate in a joint venture.

These YB brokers are more interested in making some ‘percentage’ or ‘kick-back’ or “quickie” or “toll” that is made from the deal between the two (2) parties rather than sincerely looking into the special interests of the landowners and/or the success of the JV.

These YB Brokers should focus on promoting, facilitating, stimulating, marketing and uplift the Dayak socio-economic well beings. Instead – more on politico control and selfish smartness!

What is the basis of a Joint-Venture?

The basic meaning of joint venture or joint venture company (often abbreviated JV or JVC) is an entity formed between two or more parties (Investor and Landowners and/or with other strategic partner or technology provider) to undertake and develop the JV economic activity together.

The JV parties agree to create a new entity (private enterprise or private limited and/or limited company) by contributing equity and/or other relevant monetary assets or lands, and they then share in the revenues, expenses, management and control of the enterprise. The venture can be for one specific business purpose or project, or a continuing business relationship.

In addition, a JV is not an entity, but the reason for the entity. A JV can be individuals, corporations, LLCs or even limited partnerships. There is some possible tax advantages to all of these types of holdings. How you should hold your joint venture depends upon the size of the project and/or business platform and how long you plan to be involved in the project/business.

Corporation

Just an example “Ng Ngemah Plantation Berhad”

A corporation is a separate “entity”. It can open a bank account, pay taxes, go IPO and go kaput or bankrupt. Because a corporation is its own entity, it is the safest way to start a business. By funneling everything into the corporation, you limit the liability of the other parties.

Two (2) corporations or other types of business can form another corporation and/or consortium. A corporation will need people, however, to be officers (directors) of the entity. You also need a registered agent (probably PELITA or other licensed agent). The registered agent is usually the attorney and/or a law firm who fills out the articles of incorporation and will keep up with the annual reports.

There are two (2) types of corporations

First, you as “landowner” or “landowners” formed a corporation “Sdn Bhd” and/or “Berhad” (if more than 22 shareholders) and incorporate a “B Corporation”. “A Corporation” is an investor with money/funds.

Second, to form a legitimate joint venture, party “A Corporation” and a “B Corporation” mutually agreed, signed and setup a strategic business relationship known as the Joint-Venture Company under“XYZ Corporation” say “Ng Ngemah Plantation Berhad”. You will most likely charter your joint venture under a “B charter” in that you will not be selling stocks and/or do as it deemed fit and advantage to you or the both parties.

NOTES: If you’re landless, you’re nothing. Shares and money are both liquid. There is always a risk factor in business but you can minimize it if you know how to manage such risk.

Example of corporate structure:

A “B Corporation”, or a “Sub B”, as it is often called, is limited to the number of shares of stock it can issue. A “B corporation” can only issue 100 shares (subject to your desire and strategic exit plan) of stock.

Or “A Corporation” can only sell its shares to “B Corporation” on maturity of the JVC leasehold agreement or as it deemed fit and advantage.

Or “B Corporation” has the first right of refusal to accept and/or sell “A Corporation” interests in the JVC and/or as mutually agreed.

Benefits from a transparent Joint Venture Model

A joint venture is, in effect, a form of a smart-business partnership that is limited to a particular purpose and towards more profit-sharing benefits. You give – I give; You agree – I agree; We build – We share; We earn – We share; and so on.

Among the most significant benefits derived from joint ventures is that partners have the ability to save money and reduce their risks through capital and resource sharing.

Joint venture also give landowners and/or smaller companies the chance to work with private investors and/or larger companies or multinational companies to develop, research & enhancement, manufacture, and market new products.

Whilst, JV also give companies of all sizes the opportunity to increase sales, gain access to wider markets control and/or markets penetration, and enhance technological capabilities through research and development (R&D) underwritten by more than one party.

The main purpose of JV Legal Structure

Let me highlight you with these few basic reasons for forming a joint venture model:

Internal and External reasons:

  • Build on company’s strengths, culture and good corporate governance
  • Spreading costs and risks
  • Improving access to financial resources
  • Economies of scale and advantages of size
  • Access to new technologies and customers
  • Access to innovative managerial practices

Competitive goals:

  • Influencing structural evolution of the industry
  • Pre-empting competition
  • Defensive response to blurring and fragile industry boundaries
  • Creation of stronger competitive units
  • Speed to market penetration and exploration
  • Improved agility, quality and services

Strategic objectives (regional and global)

  • Synergies
  • Transfer of skills, management and technology
  • Diversification
  • Corporate growth
  • Business and marketing networking
  • Smart partnership
  • Affiliates program

Others may includes:

  • Market development
  • Market penetration
  • Product development
  • Product proliferation
  • IPO and other possibilities
  • Credit enhancement and proactive
  • Microcredit for landowners
  • Tax advantage and other corporate benefits
  • Provision for basic humanitarian needs within the affected communities  (as part of CSR contributions): clean water, free/low rate in-house electricity supply with the scheme constituency/boundaries, basic road access, scholarship, ICT and others if it deemed fit and necessary

Stakeholders

The stockholders (investors and landowners) are the real power in the corporation. The stockholders do not have to be the same people who are officers of the corporation. They can be businesses or individuals. Their ownership of the corporation is not made public – the officers and registered agent are public information.

Managing Agent

Managing Agent (Mr. 10% BN gomen agency) need not necessary become an equity partner/stakeholder since most of them play the role as facilitators or commission agents and/or managing agent or as part of the management  teams who could also benefit from “profit-sharing” business model. By the way, the State could benefit from the taxes paid by the JVC and peoples involved in the partnership.

Government provision in JV principles

Herein let me list you some basic provision of Government roles in JV principles:

  • The government to provide land title to landowners involve in the JV project (as one of its basic public responsibilities).
  • The government the landowners interests are always protected.
  • The creation of the JV should not prevent potential players from profitably entering into business venture/market but a fair and equitable business.
  • The cost of producing the particular business and/or product, activity or services should be efficient or potentially efficient towards earning potential profits for government and the market player/private sector partner.
  • There should be no barriers for the government’s withdrawal of its contribution to the JV investment and/or the relevant.
  • The role of government as regulator of the business of the JV should be clearly and explicitly delineated from its role as implementer of the business to avoid conflicts of interest.
  • The government needs to create, develop and improved if any a new Official Development Assistance (ODA), Build Operate and Transfer Law (BOT) and Government Procurement Reform Act (GPRA) where ownership of the asset/business will stay with the landowners after the JV maturity.
  • JV Agreements should allow the landowners to take over the undertaking of the projects in its entirety after the “private investor” divests itself of any interest in the JV.
  • Accountability for the JV project ultimately devolves on the landowners and if on head of the government entity ( if government managing agent is appointed) involved in the JV Agreements and the implementation of the JV project. The private investor(s) dealing with the project are similarly held accountable for all their actions relative thereto.
  • The Government should play the roles as facilitator and promoter only.
  • The Government should also provide initiative for corporate tax benefits/incentives including that are not afforded to individuals as the projects involve long-term rural development program.

That and the fact that by putting everything into a corporation puts a limit on the liability of those involved in the corporation makes it an attractive entity to consider when you are considering how to hold a joint venture. The solutions of tomorrow are not stashed behind the walls of bureaucracy or political halls and/or here in this blog; we are people who need to enforce such Change.

Government is to serve the rakyat, it must be resilience and sincere to help promote, stimulate, facilitate and undertake to develop the nation economic sustainability, protect and enhance our quality of life within ever decreasing environmental limits and also to uplift the living standard of the poor, and not to dictate and/or marginalize them, and not stimulating racial discrimination, religious extremism and political instability.

But if our Government has worked like a Church, Mosque, Taoist Temple, Hindu Temple, Sikh Temple and other holy house, we would have been prosperous and live in peace and harmony. It’s the government’s role to protect our native rights, as individuals and our property rights and other citizenship rights.

They are not there to take care of everyone that thinks that they deserve something because someone else has it. The problem is that too many people don’t want to work to actually protect their rights, they expect the government to take care of them.

Conclusion

Today, rakyat need a resilience government; a new idea of sustainability that can imply an unchanging future or stability, if only we could work out how to get there. Resilience might be more useful, in that it assumes a dynamic environment and that perfection is impossible. Without rakyat there’s no government and without rakyat there’s no “YBs”. To serve the rakyat is never easy job but if you choose to become a “YB” then you need to lead well, serve well and finish well.

Our Government needs to design systems to accommodate failure rather than eliminate and/or ignoring or denying it their mistakes or oversights. By trying to be perfect and/or become “jagoh rakyat”, many visions of sustainability are quite brittle.

The road to stability is straight forward and the solutions is simple, and yet many politicians, scientists, economists and industrialists are busy making them complicated. No matter how complex our problems may seem, it is we ourselves who have given rise to them. They cannot be beyond our power to resolve but we can certainly Change our world.

Why? For own benefits and selfishness! Most “BN” politicians lack of moral values; politicians are only interested to amend and/or change the law or policies mostly for their own interests. We are now running out of time, and the question now is not what is happening to our NCR lands, but how bad will it be before we all starts doing enough?

QUESTION: Now, I ask you; did any of the NCR landowners benefit from the JV Legal Struture as above? Please give me one good example here. Thank you.

Cheers!!!

AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa….!!!!!

Popularity: 45% [?]

Related posts:

  1. The New Model: Joint Venture Companies Taken from article by: Assoc Prof Ramy Bulan Dayakbaru: Many...
  2. China to develop aluminium smelting plant in Sarawak. Taken from The Malaysian Insider By Syed Jaymal Zahiid Dayakbaru...
  3. RETHINKING “KONSEP BARU” NCR LAND DEVELOPMENT Posted by gkm2020 The much disputed NCR Konsep Baru Land...
  4. Politik Munoh Rakyat – land grab. Written by Dr. John Brian Anthony PBB Convention Th PBB...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Comments

161 Responses to “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT”

  1. Pengajar Udah Pencen on March 6th, 2010 5:50 pm

    gkm2020,

    It is true what you have put up in your article.I have come across areas where all these the so called land development are found.Let us start with areas in Bt Peninjau,Ladang 1,2,3,&4 in Miri Div;Balingian areas between Selangau and Mukah where land development started about 40 years ago.

    The only thing that people there talk is about losing their NCR lands.There is nothing such as well to do people what more to say MILLIONAIRES.

    Those people in Balingian areas till last year were putting up blockades into oil palm estates planted on their lands 30 years ago. The initial contract was 25 years then.There was change of hands from one developer to another.

    The new contractor was trying to replant new ones against the wishes of the Dayak landowners which had led to the BLOCKADE.

    The better concept is the private oil palm mini estates like those embarked by some of our venturous entrepreneurs in Sibuti, Niah and Suai areas.They could be millionaires in a few years time you can mark my words.

    So Dayaks don’t be forced to do some projects that could lead to you loosing your HERITAGE your NCR lands.

  2. dayaklama on March 6th, 2010 6:17 pm

    DB is still struggling with the good formula and they never found one. There are always incompatability agreement between the landowner and the developer and non of the proposal by DB is being agreed to by both parties. This resulted in the lost of both parties as those who agreed in simple agreement method had planted their palm trees and about to yield fruits by now.

    Lutor GKM2020, MT,ES,IA of DB is meddling too much on the agreement with their unpractical approach and so complicated paper works and the developer had to bring back these papers to their lawyer for interpretation and could take another year or two for viewing and reviewing. This is a lost on the part of the natives as time wait for no man and what they badly needed now is some cash from their land.
    THe developer on the other hand need not to worry much as not a single cent been spent and furthermore their business are generating monies elsewhere. Now the deal is still dangle on mid air just to agree on the term you have land and i have money. Both want to make profit out of the JV but since no agreement been made the developer can happily play golf and the natives are still struggling to make end meets. The lawyer as in their usual appearance will find ways to adding clauses to the paper to make it more complicated.

  3. gkm2020 on March 6th, 2010 6:42 pm

    Unggal PUP,

    My personal advice:

    If such element has happened then all the landowners have to refer back to their “JV AGREEMENT” and “TRUST DEED AGREEMENT” and get all the relevant evidences/exhibits.

    I already sense there is an element of “BREAH OF CONTRACT” and “BREACH OF TRUST”.

    The meaning of ‘Breach of Trust’

    Breach means to break, and a breach of trust is essentially a broken trust, a way in which someone fails to fulfill promises connected to something or someone entrusted to him/her.

    In the business sense you’ll see the term breach of trust sometimes associated specifically with the administration of trusts.

    Notes: If PELITA or SLDA or SALCRA or other “nominee” is your managing trustee or managing agent?

    For instance the trustee of JV could spend all the money in it and/or misappropriation of funds (in law, misappropriation is the intentional, illegal use of the property or funds of another person for one’s own use or other unauthorized purpose) or merely fail to do his/her/their job as specify in the agreement.

    Breach of trust may also be used in other business contexts, not merely administration of trust funds, to show how a person deliberately or through neglect failed to act in the terms specified in agreements; an accountant who embezzles funds breaks trust with his/her/their clients.

    A contract is a legally binding agreement. Breach of contract can occur when a party to a contract does something that he/she/they has agreed not to do.

    A breach of contract can also occur when a person and/or company does not do something he/she/they has agreed to do. Such violations of an agreement are often subject to various types of legally enforceable consequences.

    Contracts are put into place to protect the parties of an agreement. A contract generally outlines each party’s obligations. It is also common for prohibitions to be included in the terms of the agreement.

    Breaching a contract does not mean that a party has violated all terms of an agreement. Violating a single portion of an agreement can result in a breach of contract.

    Breaking trust isn’t always intentional. Sometimes the person in authority violates the trust of someone else simply by failing to do his or her job well or accurately.

    Other times, actions are intentional breaches and an abuse of the person’s position of trust.

    In the legal setting, the term breach of trust may be used to describe business relationships where one party failed to fulfill or intentionally broke terms of a contract. In other settings, trust can be violated in numerous ways, mostly when a person in power abuses his/her position.

    What is Breach of Contract?

    Breach of contract is a legal concept in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party’s performance.

    If the party does not fulfill the contractual promise, or has given information to the other party that the said will not perform their duty as mentioned in the contract or if by their action and their conduct seems to be unable to perform the contract, they are said to breach the contract!

    Or a fundamental breach occurs where one of the involved parties has not met with the fundamental commitments of the contract making the other party to completely terminate the contract and also sue for the damages.

    The breach of contract can only occur when there is something mentioned in the contract and one of the parties did not live up to it.

    It can be caused directly or indirectly but it has to be established in such away in the court to be termed as a breach of contract or agreement.

    What if your YBs have “Breach of Promise”??

    A breach of promise is a formerly “common tort law” that makes it possible for an individual to be sued in the event that he or she or they consented to an engagement of promoting an opportunity example “NCR Bogus Skim” that has forced you to engage into their ‘scheme’, and then later chose to pursuit legal action i.e. if the affected party desires.

    Typically, a breach of promise lawsuit will seek some type of compensation from the party who chose to withdraw from the business engagement and/or accountability.

    NOTES: The next time when these YBs say ‘it’, kindly record all (voice, video and pictures) as your exhibits and evidences, and supplementary legal documents in court. Politicians are good actors; they will never admit on what they do….’did I say that…’; ‘I couldn’t recall…’; ‘I think you have misconstrued my statement….’; and so on.

    The underlying concept is that the affected party is entitled to damages, since he or she or they presumably began to rearrange such affairs in preparation for the impending JV and/or others related to the projects.

    Jurisdictions that do still recognize a breach of promise as a valid reason for legal action usually provide specific guidelines for determining if damages are indeed merited, as well as the amount of damages that the affected party should receive.

    What is your next step?

    Simple; find a reliable lawyers to move forward with the case.

    Cheers!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa…!!!!

  4. gkm2020 on March 6th, 2010 6:56 pm

    Unggal Dayaklama,

    What a responsible intellectual you are?

    My sadness to have read your cynicism and selfish manipulations, and of course I already have my own strategic solutions which I can consider better than the BN NCR Bogus Scheme Concept when implemented.

    Such new models have been successfully implemented/developed in Indonesia, Philippines, Cambodia, Vietnam, China and in other 3rd world countries.

    But thanks again with your “selfish comment” that could easily stimulate and motivate our DB readers here to find and search for a more comprehensive solutions when we takeover the government.

    In addition, the BN policy is kaput. Believing is seeing my friend. When ones is more knowledgeable it would be easy for him/her to counter ‘stupidity’ and ‘selfishness’.

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo….Haaa…!!!

  5. Manang Empangau on March 6th, 2010 7:24 pm

    A person with such idea is too old to numbuk and ngangkut buah sawit, enda pia ku dek wai gkm2020? Sigi baka iya, kaban nya sigi rindu ngerachun humput ba ladang sawit.

  6. kelingmenua1 on March 6th, 2010 8:26 pm

    Enti nuan enda nuan meh nadai tanah

    Baka kitai ti orang asal, Kitai enda patut nyalah ka sapa-sapa enti kitai ba penujung ila kitai nadai agi tanah, di paksa baka sampah diburu peneka ati di beri notis kena sida madah ka kitai nya udah di padah arinya sida ia senang deka murun, nguroboh, nulok tanah, rumah bangsa Dayak Iban ti ba menua ulu baka “Bangsa Orang Setinggan Sarawak (Boss) Sida ti ngerja pangawa tu mega tau di banding baka ukoi penyalak.

    Pia mega kitai agi bisi masa enggau penemu pasal “Adat asal” Tang enti kitai enda merancang ari diatu. Dia kitai gagal, ka nesal, lalau deka nadai agi meruah, ti endang udah bertamadun ba bangsa Dayak / Iban.

    Enda beduli ka undang-undang nya ukai ti tegal dikena kitai enda angakat lalu tindakan enggau patut. kitai ti besmuka, betemu moa enggau sida ti penerit adat tauka sida ti bejalai ka penguat kuasa ba tanah kitai.

    Tu mega tanda-tanda ti nyadi ka tapak kaki ti alai deka lenyau semua tanah. Ni penyampu raban bala sida NGOs lalu pia mega berapa aja sida NGOs nya ti bekesan active enggau pangawa sida ti nagang pangawa ti enda betul enggau raban bangsa bukai ti setiasa ka nulong, kasih ka Rayat Dayak Iban ia ke amat active sampai ka saritu?

    Nya alai kitai mesti ka nukar cara kitai bafikir. Lalu bafikir baru, Nama utai, Lapa nya bakanya. Bakani ko cara ti tau nagang begermpong ngetan ka hak kitai serta dini alai, Lalu pia mega laban kitai udah ngerja utai ti salah lalu tetemu ka nama kebolehan enggau peluang ari semua atas nya tadi?

    Masa enda nganti kitai, masa mega deka lenyau enggau jampat ia mega deka lenyau bakanya. Nuan enggau kita semua patut deka meri penemu ti manah lalu nembu ka ia enggau manah mega ngambi ka di ingat ka sida rebak baru. Enti semua kita meda utai nya salah ba ba sejarah kitai. Kitai patut benar ngiga penemu kena kitai ngator penemu ti salah lalu ngametul ia ti salah nya.

    Kati ko tanah kitai nya patut ti perbarui “ … perlu ka enda tau enda?

    Lebih kurang 60,000 raban bangsa kitai tauka lebih deka di pindahka laban ti projek babillion ringgit ianya projek tankat ai. Projek Hijau mas tauka kelapa sawit, nya meh utai ti madang ka penkul laban tu madah ka janji ka pengaya enggau projek ti ngamasang ngaggai orang ti merinsa meskin ba menua Borneo pia mega enggau upah ari bala paty politik serta mega kuncu-kuncu ia ti meri kitai mata duit, ti meri kitai janji tu enggau nya semua nya setegal sida ia minta kitai besetuju nyerah ka tanah kitai dalam masa 60 tahun endor bakebun dadang besai endor projek kerja sama ti amat nguntong ka ti ngasoh kitai nyadi tokey besai kaya raya bisi anak kuli, kerta besai rumah besai semua nya janji-janji manis maia ka bapilih raya tauka maia ti ka ngoleh ka tanah kitai.

    Tang ba pengujong ia ari asil tanah kitai di ambil, berapa iko iban / Dayak ti udah jadi jutaan, bisi rumah kedai, bisi diri sebilik udah jadi engineer, lotor, General, Kerja perintah orang dagang? Semua nya nadai nunjok ka kita Dayak Iban bisi udah masang kenyau ari 47 tahun projet Pembangunan projek nulong rayak termaskin Rayat Iban / Dayak.

    Ba pasal tanah ti di perbahru cara sida ngatur ia iany di bagi ngaggai (3) cara, menua ti besai. Di pelajar ka orang-orang ti landik pasal tanah. Tanah di sewaka enggau tanah di bagi ka.

    Tanah di pelajar ka tauka di slidik sida perintah mayar ia enggau duit ngaggai siko-siko ngagggai orang ti empu tanah ianya sida ti di usir tauka di asoh keluar tauka di pindah ka, tu udah nunjok ka nadai meri penguntong lalu policy sida ia mega nunjok ka diatu magi ia lalu di sewa ngaggai orang ti ba empu Tanah di sewa ngaggai orang patut ka enda cara sistem tu di kelala orang orang ti empu tanah, hak rakyat tauka tanah adat asal ari nya tanah nya tadi endang patut di sida ti empu tanah berhak ba tanah sida ia.

    Magi ka tanah, ianya siti agi utai ti amat beguna pasal hal-hal tanah ba menua sabah enggau Sarawak. Ia ke benar tanah nya di beli ari sida ti empu tanah (Orang ti ka nyual tanah) ngaggai perintah ti ka meli tanah pia mega GLCs sida ari senanjong tauka wakil ia tauka kompeni menua Sarawak baka sida Pelita, Salcra, enggau sida ti bukai) secara langsung enggau enda langsung tau ka orang ti di percaya (Segi udang-undang tauka enda ngena undang-udang) sida tu meh nyadi wakil pembeli ari kompeni ti ka melabur (Orang ti ka meli) lalu babagi ka tanah, ngambi ka sida tu di peraya ka rakyat lalu rakyat meh percaya ka sida tu ba hal-hal tanah jual enggau beli.

    BN-Bangsa Melayu endang sigi jaguh mutar belit ka fakta serta enggau hal-hal duit.
    Mata duit Malaysia endang sigi udah terbilang ukai semina ba menua tu aja, tang mega ba dunia ianya ti besangkut paut enggau utai ti bekesan, sikap pemalas, layan ti enda manah, salah ngena kuasa, enda di layan sama rata, ba pilih bangsa, berita surat khabar ti berat sebelah, jalai pengarap ti kelalu serta enggau pangawa makai suap.

    Tu meh siti ari ti malam ba reti semua ia, ngajoah ka diri ari rayat enggau tanggong jawap, ukai semina sida ia lalari ngalaban perintah 47 tahun lalu sentiasa nabur ka janji ti ka munas ka penyarata kelebih agi Iban Dayak. Kemajuan. Wakilan ti nulong rayat tang laban ti ketegal pangawa politik ti enda betul ti di karandau tauka di pejurai ka.

    Bala Dayak belaban enggau Raja Melayu – Merti ka hak nuan sebagai ‘orang asal menua tu’

    a) Nama tugas-tugas tauka pangawa sida adat istidat tu ti bisi ba menua kitai ditu? Bisi ka enda sida Native court tu ketuai akim, tuan lawyer, pegawai pentabiran ti bejalai ka pangawa ba pekara adat isidat tu?
    b) Enti status kitai tu sama sebaka enggau Melayu Bumiputra. Court kitai ianya sama ka enda enggau syariah court ti udah disebut ba AKTA Tanah Malaya 1957
    c) Bakani atur cara opis-opis ba tanah Malaya ianya AKTA 1957 (Ukai 1963) ti ngelala 18/20 –points Sarawak/Sabah surat perjanjian ti ngasoh menua tu kena pegai lalu di takbir oleh menua Malaya ti jadi menua Malaysia ti kediatu? Bisi ka enda dokumen tu di layan secara penuh adat opis?
    d) Akta Tanah adat Melayu ianya melindung lalu mejamin hak melayu; Kati ko Dayak bisi ka sida ia tanah NCR tanah hak adat tauka Tanah hak bangsa asal nya bisi akta?
    e) Nama tugas-tugas Majlis adat istiadat menua Sarawak. (ba konsil, main asal, adat asal? Bakani ko cara ti manah nulong raban bangsa tu enggau Dayak NGOs?
    f) Enti orang Asli bisi opis ianya hal-hal orang Asli (JHEOA) Rumah sakit. Nama kabuah alai kitai tau enda boleh siti?
    g) Enti cina tauka tambi bisi sekolah bantuan; Nama kabuah alai kitai enda boleh dih siti?
    h) Enti Melayu bisi kojej sida ia. Nama kabuah alai kitai enti enda boleh ka siti ga?
    i) Enti adat nya dikumbai “adat asal” undang-undang asal, asal usul ukom tunggu, Bisi ka nya enda sama enggau adat ukom bangsa Melayu enggau Dayak? Adakah nya dikumbai kitai hal dan saksama?
    j) Dayak nya ukai Bumiputra ianya sida ia tu enda sama kemudahan enggau bangsa Melayu?
    k) Kati ko sida Melayu nya bangsa orang asal tauka Bumiputra’ tauka raban bangsa bukai or bangsa Malayan Muslim.
    l) Kati ko orang Dayak nya orang ukai bangsa asal tauka Bumiputra, tauka bangsa lain-lain?
    m) Kati ko orang Asli sida tu bangsa asal, tauka Bumipurta tauka peribumi?
    n) Tanah adat bangsa hal NCR, Uji padah ka nama utai ti lain dia ianya antara harta rayat, ti di akta ka enggau harta pesindirian tauka harta dagang?

    Sajauh mana kah sida tu tuai-tuai Dayak, bala political parties, NGOs bala sida Majlis Adat Istiadat tauka Native Court sama mega “DB/DL” udah sedia lalu deka serta oleh nyimpan penemu, menjalai ka pansik sida ia ti amat deka nama ka wakil sida ia ba tempat ti lebih tinggi agi tauka ngatur ia ngaggai Managerment pia mega ngaggai agensi perimerintah termasuk GLCs lalu numbuh lalu ngator hal-hal Dayak enggau Adat Asal.

    Kita mega patut ngiga keputusaan penemu ari diatu ti niteh ka peneka ka ati kitai, hal ti bapilih bangsa, hal ti ngada suara jako sembana Dayak di dinga ba dalam policies ti dipeguna ianya kesan ngaggai penghidup kitai serta kesan ngaggai sida ti rebak baru. Aku semina ngarap ka tu oleh di kerja kitai ari ti keterubah ia betukar kitai sigi patut.

    Ditu aku ka ngarintai ka nuan sekeda ari tips ti amat mudah ti kena nuan ngetan ka tanah NCR Nuan.

    LIMA (5) langkah ti patut di ambi nuan awak ka tanah NCR ti di tuntut nuan lenyau ti pakai masa:

    1) Surat Bantahan (Surat ti mantah) ngaggai opis tanah ba kes-kes orang ti ngambi ka sida ti bejalai ka adat pasal hal-hal tanah ti madah ka tuntuntan nya dalam tanda tanya.

    2) Tanya meh opis tanah enggau surat menyurat, ba surat ti bentuk cara borang komplin ba opis tanah ianya ‘siasatan awam, public inquire, tauka complin ari raykat.

    3) Enti nuan ngajong surat ngaggai opis tanah anang enda ngasoh sida ti kerja dia tandatangan nerima surat nuan nya lalu pia mega setiap kali nuan bisi meri surat ka sida ia.

    4) Aduka ka sekurang-kurang ia tiga kali ianya tiap bulan beturut-turut tauka mega ngalangkah bulan ti kena kita surat nya sebagai siasatan awam tauka komplin ari raykat. Enti sida masih gagal enda tauka enda beduli tauka nadai saut, bai kes kita nya ngaggai courts.

    5) Ia ke penudi ia datai ngaggai opis court- tunjuk ka bukti-bukti nuan enggau saksi nuan ambi meh bukti baka gambar dokumen-dokmen bukai temasuk meh cerita lama, kar menua GPS, Laporan pasal hal-hal tanah tauka utai bukai ti besangkut paut enggau nya. Bantah meh ngaggai NGO, Bantai meh ka tunjok perasan kita ti kena penusah nya ti sama-sama ba penusah ti sama lalu ambil meh wakil lawyer(s) “Saman enggau tuntut hak kita.

    NOTES:

    a) File enggau dokumen oleh lenyau pia mega orang ti kerja ba opis tanah nya udah nadai agi kerja dia lalu pangawa ia nyangka d iambi orang bukai ti kiroh pasal tanah nuan. Tu sigi maioh udah berlaku ba masa-masa ti udah.

    b) Opis tanah mega oleh enggai niteh ka peminta nuan tauka enda melayan komplin nuan nya laban ti kena tekan ari orang bukai ti ngaku nya tanah NCR sida ia tauka ia badalih madah ka nya hal-hal akta tanah aja.

    c) Ba Sarawak , ianya Majlis Adat Istiadat nya meh tulang belakang ti nuduk ka undang-undang ti di beri kod dikumbai orang Tanah Adat menua (Ti endang bisi di terangka) Undang-undang nya ba 1996, Ko hal adat bangsa ti endang udah di simpan lalu di terangka oleh Majlis Adat Istiadat udah ti nerima penerang ari tuai-tuai tauka tuai rumah ari pupu raban bangsa ti endang udah ti kemendarka cabinet menua. Ba baruh undang-undang kod bangsa adat ti di terangka nyadi ka hak adat asal ti enda patut ti tanya suat ka agi ba dini-dini court sida ia endang deka meri tangang hal ti sama. Peda meh enti bisi utai ti tertingal utai ti besangkut paut enggau hak orang asal ditu?

    d) ‘BUMIPUTERA tauka Bumiputra ianya jako sida Melayu ti amat diguna enggau besai ba Malaysia, sida ti termasuk ba gulong tu ianya sida ti Melayu. Jako tu datai ari Sanskit jako Bhumiputra ianya mega di kalih ka ngaggai “anak ba tanah” kosep bumiputra tu ianya suku raban bangsa ba dalam Malaysia ti di simpan ba tanah Malaya ti nyadi ka rang undang-undang Malaysia ba Akta 153. Tang Akta nya enda ngena jako “BUMIPUTRA”.

    Nuan sigi bisi hak ngeriport ngaggai balai polis, enti sema orang termasuk pihak bekuasa ti nengah tanah nuan enda beradat, pia mega baka tanah NCR nuan (tauka dikumbai kitai tanah adat bangsa asal sida tu ngarosak ka utai tanam utai tumbuh ti bisi ba tanah nuan dia. Nya mega termasuk hal-hal ti enda beradat, mai surat ti nyunjok ka sida bisi kuasa ba tanah nuan dia. Ba Akta tanah Malaya bap ke 13 ti nyendiaka ianya nadai siko orang peneka ngarampas harta ti endang udah bisi ba undang-undang.

    e) Jadi Akta nya tadi meh hak nuan sebagai rayat: Nadai siko orang ti oleh terlepas ari kerja ti jai ti kumbai kitai orang ti ngareja utai ti enda tentu baberita. Semadi meh keputusan hakim nyunjok ka kes nya tanah askar, tanah sida nibe tauka tanah sida samseng, arinya leboh maia masa ti deka baperang tauka perkara ti enda tertaram tauka nadai orang ti patut di salahka

    f) Systematic tanah Alienation…pia policy pangawa perintah (ia ti maioh agi ti endang galak ka bala sida raban politik) kena kitai ngabis ka cerita lama hal-hal ti udah belaku enggau sama sakali. Enti nuan tak nadai tanah, dia nuan udah lenyau tempat asal nuan, hak nuan enggau cerita lama.

    g) Anang meh jadi pengujong nuan lenyau tanah nuan lalu nyadi pelalarian ba tanah diri empu serta tanah asal tanah menua tanah termuda ia ti dulu suba semina jadi kenang laban nuan ba rang undang-udang ti baru tu dia tanah nuan ti di kerja orang endor macam-macam projek pemasang di bai parti politik BN ti di undi nuan maia ti ba pilih ti lalu.

    Nuan meh orang asal ari turun menurun ari berapa generasi ti ngetan ka dunia tanah tumuda kitai ari nya nuan meh orang ti amat berhak berkuasa ngetan ka menua enggau tanah nuan empu, nuan mega orang ti patut ngurus lalu ngator hal-hal tanah nuan empu, nuan mega orang ti patut ngetan ka tanah nuan empu ti di turun ka ari tubuh sida aki, ini apai indai lalu ngaggai tubuh kitai tu, jadi nama aja projek pemasang ba tanah nuan dia nuan patut nemu bakani ko sistem enggau cara ti ngutong ka nuan lalu pia mega undang-undang kena nuan ngetan lalu nuan pun boleh pengutong ari hasil tanah nuan.

    Utung ti betul enggau patut; Laban nuan ti orang bangsa asal, dia nuan orang meh amat behak aria bi-besi- ti di kena, enggau di atur kena ngamasang ka tanah, lalu utai ti hidup dia secara semula jadi ba tanah nuan dia sepatut benar di bayar baik ka ia secara kena tengah tauka ngusak alam-alam sekitar ari kerja-kerja ti ngemasang ka tanah dia.

    Laban ba dalam undang-undang enti angin, tanah ai sungai tecemar tau hal-hal utai bukai dia nuan endang patut ngagai undang-undang awak ka nuan kena bayar lalu pia mega nuan sepatut nya minta di cara enggau adil enggau saksama.

    Nya alai udah 47 tahun kitai udah Meredeka endang patut benar kitai nukar undi kitai ngaggai parti bukai parti PAS, PKR, DAP tauka nama-nama pati bukai asal aja enda BN ti termasuk ari PBB, PSR, SPDP
    , SUPP, UMMO, PCRM

    Laban udah lama amat kitai di tindas, di jajah, di pilih kasih, di janji manis enggau projek2 Maggie Mee, Setiap menjelang pilih Raya dia kitai ninga ber-juta-juta ringgit projek ti ka datai. Setiap mejelang pilih raya duit RM300.00 tauka RM1000.00 ringgit sepintu tauka kimpin diri sebilik ngajong IC boleh duit RM30.00 tauka RM50 siko orang

    Tauka minyak motor dibayar RM150.00 Ngaggai RM500.00 maia bakimpin.

    Tauka Malu laban tuai rumah maia ti nerima duit RM5000.00 tauka RM7000.00 ari BN laban nuan ti ngundi penyakal dia nuan asai ka Malu-Malu nerima duit dia tauka Tuai Rumah nya enggai maji duit ngaggai nuan laban nuan tu Penyakal.

    Pia mega nuan takut enggai enda ngundi BN laban takut

    - Number ic nuan sama enggau serial number ba muai undi dia ukoi-ukoi BN nemu
    - Takut ka Baja getah, baja padi di tarit pulai tauka enda boleh peminta
    - Takut ka bila minta nuan baka lada, getah, sawit nuan enda boleh peminta ba opis betanam betupi.
    - Takut laban enti nuan ngudi parti penyakal anak-anak nuan enda boleh sekularship ba Kolej, University serta Secondary school

    Takut laban enti kitai ari penyakal dia kitai nadai boleh duit satu cent pun maia bapilih laban penyakal DAP, PAS, PKR Independent nya nadai duit.

    Jadi enti kitai IBAN/DAYAK agi penemu bakanya sa-agi nya meh kitai agi tusah laban enda nemu hak diri empu.

    Tanah NCR enda di sukut 47 tahun udah meredeka gara-gara opis tanah nadai arahan ari pihak atas sapa agi BN.
    Anak-anak kitai sekula setakat form 5 laban kitai di nadai duit kena nyambong sida ngaggai tecknical skol tau ka Kolej tauka university enggau maktap

    Enda boleh kerja perintah laban enda cukup syarat dia sida ari luar Sarawak meh nyadi boss kitai baik ka ba balai polis, opis pelajar, opis betanama etc.

    Tang enda ga kitai nemu or sedar ianya kitai ti ka ka semua nya laban kitai milih BN X nyadi ka pengarai kitai nyadi wakil rayat kitai laban kitai semina BN aja oleh nulong Rayat. Parti-Parti bukai enda oleh nulong Rayat.

    Diatu kita udah meda.

    Projek Hydro udah cukup maioh ngabis ka tanah menua kitai Sarawak enda cukup ba Lubuk Antu , Ngaggai Bakun, Enda cukup Bakun ba Ulu Baram enda cuku ulu Baram ba Serian jadi Sarawak meh orang ti paling Kaya Eletrik laban Hydro din-ditu.

    Tang kemusah alam sekitar, kayu di balak di tebang di empu tokey-tokey BN ukai di empu DAYAK IBAN. Projek diatu pun ukai mega di empu tauka di hasil kerja sama baka ba LADANG kelapa Sawit laban nya enggai ka nguntong ka Rayat. Jadi Rayat menua nya aja di peguna bekuli makai gaji arian.

    Nya alai udah pantut benar kitai nukar perintah BN laban nya perintah munuh rayat

  7. Manang Empangau on March 6th, 2010 8:37 pm

    Kitai ke udah tuai nyau enda dapat numbuk ngangkut buah sawit patut aktif bepolitik sampai ke parai ga. Nya meh kebuah sida Taib, Jabu, Chan, Awan, Jemot tebabit ba politik sampai ke bungkok, nyau ngerising udah tuai gamal. Sida ke nembiak patut dansak kitai nanam sawit kadiri empu ga tauka dansak gawa ba ladang sida SALCRA enggau OP JV ke bukai.

  8. Manang Empangau on March 6th, 2010 8:37 pm

    Kitai ke udah tuai nyau enda dapat numbuk ngangkut buah sawit patut aktif bepolitik sampai ke parai ga. Nya meh kebuah sida Taib, Jabu, Chan, Awan, Jemot tebabit ba politik sampai ke bungkok, nyau ngerising udah tuai gamal. Sida ke nembiak patut dansak kitai nanam sawit kadiri empu ga tauka dansak gawa ba ladang sida SALCRA enggau OP JV ke bukai.

  9. anthonyselat on March 6th, 2010 9:59 pm

    terima kasih ungal KELINGMENUA1 berentak ninga ia…NADAI DUIT DIRI EMPU NDA MEH NGASUH ORG NGEREJA TANAH DIRI NDA NGAWA TINGAL PROJEK PEMANSANG BN..KA IA LEPI NDA MAKAI LABAN TEBELUNSA BAI’ CDA AKI KELIA MAKAI MULUNG BERUMPANG KAMPUNG..UKAI NYA DIBERI MAKAI MADANG MELAI,MADANG KEJURU DIAK….

  10. Manang Empangau on March 6th, 2010 10:05 pm

    Amat nyengala berentak ga penemu Igat Keling nya, nyau nyeligi langit neh.

  11. dayaklama on March 6th, 2010 10:51 pm

    I read someone wrote in this blog that ‘Kitai bansa nyamai dikemeli lalu olih dikeduan”.It reminded me of the Tinting Tinjau episode.Here someone came with an idea of publishing a Dayak magazine.An appeal was made for contribution of articles and share holding/funding. Permit was said to be granted by KDN and first issue of the magazine to roll by September 2009.

    A checked with KDN did not seem to suggest that the publishing permit has ever been granted.If DB are thinking Dayaks (as they often claimed) they should request that the purported “permit” be displayed in this blog.OR DB do not mind being taken for ride and dubbed?.

  12. anakuli on March 6th, 2010 11:24 pm

    dayaklama dah abis idea dah..
    Ka ngajar orang tudah ke NUMPANG…
    Enti salah nama kebuah ka enggau
    kami ditu???

    DAYAKBARU SIKO MENSIA SITI NAMA….
    HIDUP DAYAK!!!!!
    ANANG NUMPANG…..

  13. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 12:32 am

    Unggal Kelingmenua1,

    I refer to your comment: kelingmenua1 on March 6th, 2010 8:26 pm

    Many thanks for translating some part of my article DAYAK – UNDERSTAND YOUR “NATIVE RIGHTS” PART I dated March 4, 2010 into Iban language.

    Am really glad to see your kind effort, spirit and determination. Truly appreciated it very much my friend.

    I also hope others would do the same so that our peoples living in the rural areas and/or undeserved areas can read it in our own Iban mother language.

    Terima kasih kaban.

    Best wishes and regards, gkm2020

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo….Haaa….!!!!>

  14. engkerawai on March 7th, 2010 7:19 am

    I would not say the Scheme is ‘MUNOH RAKYAT’
    It should benefit the landowners in long term.
    We are quite worried of the mismanaged scheme trying to fool the kampung folks selling their land at a very cheap rate…to these LAUTS and the greedy CINA..

    The Gov’t is not honest in implementing the land policy…it’s tantamount to abuses and widespread exploitations of NCR lands without proper development concepts.

    The kampung folks are on the loosing end..because they lacked understanding of legal procedures implemented by BANNED gov’t…

  15. Anderson Melintang on March 7th, 2010 8:31 am

    Tabi Kaban (nuju GMK2020)

    SEMUA SKIM PERINTAH MANAH, MANSANG KA RAKYAT

    Kaban GMK 2020, your article is totally misleading “accusing govt killing people”. Don’t be too harsh with your statement and you can be brought to ISA for this statement friend!!!!.

    By the nature of your statement you are indeed fanatic opposing any type of land development.

    If you twist neck by looking back the land development scheme in 1960s, and study the profitable impact on the Iban or dayak in general.
    During mid 1960s, CM Stephen Kalong and PM Tun Razak jointly implemented GREEN BOOK. Under this mega project FELDA in West Malaysia and SLDB in Swk developed state land for the people to settle in RUBBER SCHEME B.

    In SWk, the scheme B were in Melugu, Meradong and Lambir. In Meradong each family was given not 10 acres of rubber trees planted and 2 acres empty land for other cultivation such padi and vegetable. Beside that, a comfortable wooden house with electricity and watersupply were provided also.

    Most the land Scheme B are already transferred from SLDB to the people after 30 years period. This is good development program. The current price for an acre of land in Scheme B Meradong is 60k, which means most the Iban there is already half millionaire by land asset valvue. They are not as poor as you think.

    …..WHICH MEANS GMK2002/DB ACCUSSATION IS WRONG—IBAN UNDER THE SCHEME B WERE GIVEN STATELAND FREE IN 1967 AND AFTER 30 YEARS IS HALF MILLIONAIRE BY LAND VALUE……

    Nya aja wai anak bloggers

  16. Akiq Hawong on March 7th, 2010 9:05 am

    After 30 years, nyau manah ga nasit sida iya laban rega tanah nya manah. Hmmmm…untung amat sida anak uchu nya dikerandangka apai indai sida iya jalai ke manah chara ngulihka duit enggau mudal.

    Enti sekim nya digaga ba ulu Baleh din ba menua Bukit Tibang, sigi kaya sida anak uchu sida kaban laban tanah sida nyau berega amat ila. Nyau baka menua Pulau Batam nya dia, mayuh daging mensia ulih empa mata’.

    Sekali sekala ka ga aku ke udah tuai tu ngabas menua kia ila, enti umur tu panjai. Biar bejalai betungkat kia. Sida Indon pen tentu selalu datai kia ngasoh menua nya nyau rami belama alau aktiviti meli kereta 4WD pen maju.

    Nyau bakaderut sida moto 4WD mansa laban sida salesman Indon rajin amat nyual kereta ke bansa nya. Negeri Kapit, negeri Belaga sigi sunyi ila, nyau semina kena pansa kena limpas aja baka ke mayau ke mansa sida ke makai utai nyamai neh.

    Diatu sekim nupi jelu babas ba Lanjak Entimau sigi nguntungka rayat dulu din ila laban mayuh pelanchong datai ka meda jelu babas alu diau ba homestay ba ulu Katibas din.

    Sapa ke bisi speedbot sigi muntang laban urang ka nyata perau ke ulu kin. Sekali nyata bo, sigi ka dichaj lebih ari RM1,000 laban menua ke jauh. Untung mesti digagaka besai ga.

    Baka ba sekim ba sebelah Bkt Peninjau, Bintulu, Machan, Beton, LAetc, sida anak uchu, turun temurun sigi ka nyadi jutawan enggau muntang udah ambis tempoh 60 taun nya.

    Hmmmmm….tua ke udah tuai tu angka enda ampit meda sida anak/uchu nyau kaya deriba kerita sepot kulu kili mansang injoy agai menua Kuching mai sida endu ke bebajik bejoli ba sebelah Sulu Karaoke ba BDC nya.

    So, anang lembau mai sekim ke ulu kin enti ka meda anak uchu kaya dudi ari ila. Nadai perintah ka ngambi tanah. Sida ke bemain ba belakang tabir nya semina ka nginjau tanah sida dayak aja, udah nya dipulai ke baru agai ke ngempu tanah awakka sida iys kaya.

    Tuboh aku tu sigi enda ulih kaya tanh arapka anak uchu kaya udah bekau sekim JV nya ambis timpoh.

  17. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 10:05 am

    Unggal Anderson Melintang,

    I refer to your comment – Anderson Melintang on March 7th, 2010 8:31 am

    Thanks for your kind comment and input; by the way I like this mode of two (2) ways discussion because it’s not only help you and me here but it’d also help to create awareness for others to analyze it which is good and bad and/or positive or negative.

    Life is all about communication, awareness, education and relationship. Without these basic elements, life is meaningless when facing the realworld challenge (regional or global).

    Historical Facts: there is no ‘stateland’ in Borneo even before the British Brookes and the Federation of Malaysia was formed, it is always the “Native Customary Land” (abi-besi tauka tanah pesaka) as referred to our adat and/or native court. Therefore why give native land free to the native when it is already theirs? Then who have taken their native customary rights?

    However, let me broaden you a bit of my article herein; I’ve never quote “accusing govt killing people” – my statement stated that “Skim Makai Rayat” and/or “Skim Munoh Rayat”.

    “Makai” and “Munoh” scheme also terms as “marginalization” – say “Marginalization Scheme”??

    “Stateland Policy” exist because of “Political Economy of Timber, Natural Resources and Land Policy”!

    “Skim” herein means a ‘Land Scheme’ – the context of the land development scheme with an elaborate and systematic plan of marginalization action on the native rights (referred to as “New NCR Land Development Scheme” as promoted by Barisan Nasional (BN) political party).

    This BN NCR Land Development Scheme is a failure in which it is associated with land rights and native title, so that native people in remote and undeserved Sarawak are land rich but still dirt poor and marginalized.

    Until then the government of Sarawak remains unconstitutional and unlawful, and the people of Dayak (referred to as native) origin, through the BN political conglomerate, continue to be denied their full political, indigenous and constitutional rights.

    Now, let me herein quotes you some words from our grassroots level:

    “Our community has lived in this area for many decades and we had cultivated the land with padi, fruit trees and some cash crops including oil palm on a small scale. But now, we are told that we have no rights and we were even ordered to stop using and cultivating our lands. If the government has acquired our lands and given it to the company, why are we not informed or notified and compensated accordingly? Our lands and properties are taken behind our back and issued to others. This is sheer robbery. The government and our leaders should be protecting our rights to our lands and not simply giving it to others without informing and consulting us. Some people are allowed to thrive but some are left to be deprived. We have engaged a lawyer to defend us and to apply for the order to be set aside.”

    Said: Tuai Rumah, Jupiter Anak Segaran, Iban Village Chief, Rumah Jupiter, Sungai Gelasa, Lembong, Suai, Sarawak

    “I am very concerned about this development because it affects my people’s livelihood. I do not agree with this type of development and the manner it is conducted.

    The development of plantations in this area will definitely result in the destruction and loss of the resources on our lands which we depend on for our survival. The company should recognise our existence here. Our people were born here, brought up and nurtured in this area and we want to continue to live on this land and surrounding forests.”

    Said: Alung Ju, Penan Village Chief of Long Singu, Peliran, Belaga District, Kapit Division, Sarawak

    Now, let me highlight to you and other readers here and compare to the current i.e. the so-called BN “New NCR Land Development Concept” with these two (2) basic initiatives; “Landbanking Model” and/or “Asset Securization Model” . NOTES: **There are many other JV and/or business model. Which of these two models compare to the BN NCR Concept that could benefit the Iban/Dayak faster than the current 60 years leasehold scheme?

    What’s the value of ‘ringgit’ today (US$1 – RM3.40 and the major economic inflation, unforeseen globalization, etc) and in 30 – 60 years time?

    When we do JV and/or business it is about generating profits as many and as fast as you can be; while investment is about spinning and leveraging money for better yields.

    Business entity never last forever (it either propel or bankrupt) but Land entity will last forever (its always there); will your next generation be able to see it again after 30 -60 years?

    Can ‘Taib’ and ‘Jabu’ guarantee it? Or will they be around in the next 30 – 60 years as your witness when the unforeseen arise?

    To seek reformation, we need to be proactive and always plan ahead; if you fail to plan – you plan to fail!

    Lastly, when we talk about “Land Reform” can this be part of “ISA” ie to indirectly telling no one has the rights to discuss and/or talk about any “reformation” (also means in a positive rather than negative light). The current “BN NCR Land Development Concept” truly need a total reformation ie to improve (or an intended improvement) the existing form or condition of the land policies, institutions or practices etc.; and intended to make a striking Change for the better in native affairs, the rakyat and the environmental impacts.

    Cheers!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo….Haaa….!!!!

  18. Pensioner on March 7th, 2010 11:04 am

    This beautifull Sunday morning I would like to pose two questions for the ever vocal gkm2020, ukoi bali PE@Hakiq Hawong, sekali-aja-nyengat engkerawai and the rest of DB goons.Its simple nevertheless tricky.

    1)Which of the following promises are easy to keep/fulfill?
    a) For the Federal gomen to hand over the RM3.4 billions development to Sarawak.

    OR

    b) The promise by DB to publish few thousand copies of “Tinting Tinjau” which was due to be delivered by Septemeber last year.

    2) Kindly spot the difference of the two promises?

  19. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 11:31 am

    Unggal Pensioner,

    Thanks for the comment. Now let me highlight you a little hidden info. Kindly spot the hidden scenario?

    Dear DB Readers and All,

    UNDISCLOSED FINANCIAL INTELLIGENT REPORT:

    The recent RM3.4bil (US$1B) allocation for infrastructure projects in Sarawak under the 10th Malaysia Plan and National Key Results Areas (NKRAs) project funding as announced by Najib recently, the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) US$11B and the Aluminum Corp of China Ltd (Chalco) US$1B project funding for Sarawak SCORE have ‘no real money’ (digital figure but not hard cash).

    The project papers are real but no real money (cashless). Hope someone has not paid his/her/their ‘toll’ when lobbying such projects. And hope such projects would not be used as a based for ‘politico mileage’?

    There’s no real money as the figure have been converted into “quota system” (both for credit and investment quota) by the Bank for International Settlement (BIS) under the reorganization of the international monetary system!!

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) is an international organization of central banks which “fosters international monetary and financial cooperation and serves as a bank for central banks”.

    “Quotas” also determine how much each member country central bank can borrow from the IMF and the World Bank when in need of aid.

    If the funds are not approved by BIS then for sure the projects cannot take off….but drag on….and/or basically stuck… Wonder who is behind BIS today neh?

    In addition Malaysia is still short of Ringgits circulation in the market to balance-up the incoming USD and other foreign currencies.

    Wonder what happened to our legal tender money; RM500.oo and RM1000.oo banknotes (Serial No. ZY, ZZ, ZV, ZA, ZB)?

    Dini enda penungak duit tu neh….?? Sapa enda nyimpan duit tu neh? Berapa mayoh penyampau semua duit tu neh?

    NOTES: I hope you all could think beyond it here…..

    Aku arap kita ditu anang terkejut…..Cheers!

    Agi Idup – Agi Ngelaban…Hooo…..Haaa…..!!!!

  20. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 11:49 am

    Unggal Pensioner and the honorable DB Readers,

    On the “Tintin Tinjau” subject/proposal I would rather leave it to Dr. JBA to inform the readers here and would not elaborate beyond that.

    But to my personal knowledge, most of the “Tintin Tinjau” articles (95%) are extracted from this blog. Therefore, we’re already on the “Tintin Tinjau” website now and its free of charge….tak ada toll lah….

    Then, what happen to the many promises and politico manifesto promoted by the BN YBs for the last 47 years? When will we see Batang Ai General Hospital, Kanowit-Song-Kapit Rd, and many other promised humanitarian basic infrastructures promised by the Umno-BN gomen?

    Kindly spot the different?

    Cheers!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa…!!!

  21. changop4540 on March 7th, 2010 11:51 am

    The JV idea drawn by DBs law maker will never make sale. So far no JV companies use the formula as what DL said it’s too complicated and if it ever kick start will eventually prone for failure. To get to agree and really fair in proportion distribution is almost impossible to meet especially when it dangle on ” you have land and i have money “.
    There is no such thing as win-win situation and it is always a win-lose as one party will likely to make more than the other.

    For example Mr.Gun want to hire a piece of land to put his machineries or build the warehouse hiring rate is fixed according to the tenure agreement and it does not taking into account if the tenant make more money upon expansion of his bussiness. The rental rate is still as before and the land owner cannot demand for more.

    Back to the JV, this is worst scenario where the developer who has money had to start from the ground work until the land is useful for planting. His money is already dead here and only roll back to alive when the palm trees bear fruits and able to make sale but will not immediately recover the money been spent. How can the developer give 50/50 on every harvest of the palm fruit to the land owner as his partner. The price is fluctuating and worst still he shall not able to expand or plant the palm trees on top of each other on the same land not like the case of Mr.Gun above.

    In any instance the agreement will favour more to the one who has money.

    Anang Ngelaban Perintah Wat.

  22. Pensioner on March 7th, 2010 12:12 pm

    Readers and All,

    Attention: gkm2020

    1) If thats is the case (this blog to replace Tinting Tinjau) why the need to ask for new articles?
    2) why the need to design the magazine cover, its layout?
    3) Why waste time discussing its marketing strategy?
    4) Why the need to ask for permit from KDN?
    5) Why not change the name of this blog to Tinting Tinjau?Why appealed for fund to finance the printing?
    6)Why fooled people or make faalse hope by saying the project must not failed?
    7)Why beat around the bush and not telling the truth that the permit was rejected cos the magazine is perceived as racist?
    8) If DB can break its promise what locus standi have they in asking YDK to keep also his promise?

    Conclusion: “KITAI BANSA NYAMAI DIKEMELI LALU OLIH DIKEDUAN”

  23. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 12:33 pm

    Unggal changop4540,

    Let me ask you with these ‘candid’ questions;

    If BN has knew the “NCR Land Development Concept” is always ‘win-lose’ business and/or one-sided advantage or has no benefit to the landowners or the native landowners are always on the loosing end, then why these BN goons promote the said scheme?

    ***Is this not a “bogus scheme” when the native landowners are proven scam of their land rights?

    If it is not feasible and/or viable then why should the native landowner forced to JV with the private investor?

    If the developer find that there is already an element of risk in the project, then why should they continue with the said project? In any business and/or investment there is always an element of risk and if its not in favor of the investor – they can chicken out!

    If the revenue sharing and/or the profit sharing has been agreed on 50/50 (or whatever mutually agreed: 51/49 or 60/40 or 70/30 or 55/45) basis then both party must honored it as per their legal agreement.

    Which is more precious “land” or “money”? Land never fluctuate money does!

    Land is priceless unless the government has a hidden agenda on what to grade the native land value?

    Why is “native land” has less value as compared to ‘mixed zone land’ and/or ‘freehold land’; is this not the same land that have been converted to a better value?

    Why is “native land” not issue a land title when others (Malay reserve land title, etc) can have one? Please kindly explain?

    Why is “Land Code” BN Policy depriving the native peoples from legally owning their NCR Land? Please kindly elaborate it.

    Why is “native land” has less collateral/liquidation value to local Bank; is this not BN Policy?

    Leka ka nganka tu dulu ngal…agi mayoh utai ka disebut…ila tua nampong baru.

    Cheers!!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa…!!!!

  24. Merakat anak Piun on March 7th, 2010 12:44 pm

    gkm2020…..well said and vey precise concept of JV.

    The way I see those DL, Pensioner, etc….they are still living inside their little shell where they have been enjoying easy life through little effort of tir own but the handouts from others.

    They are those sumbags waiting for Sung’s donation or Taib handouts while they themelves will not think how to be a true independence both financially or in their opinion or thinking.

    Look at this pensioner, he is “kerioh” with tintin tinjau. Did he see how serious is our NCR land issues????? Which is more critical, Tintin Tinjau or NCR land issues?????

    Forever he and DL will deviate and decieve DB so that they will continue on to live with Sung”s donation and Taib handouts. Easy life, isn’t Aya Pensioner and kaban DL?????? Maybe R2,000 sebulan Aya Pensione????Gosh big money!!!!!!

    Madi gkm2020..don’t worry about these scumbags..continue on to speak out as we don’t want Sung’s donation or Taib’ handouts. we want to optimise what our land can generate through our own effort….

    Change we Must and Can …satu dua tiga Hooo…Haaaa.

  25. Telaga Kumang on March 7th, 2010 12:46 pm

    Whatever it is, unless and until “Tinting Tinjau” is in the market DB has no moral gound in insisting that BN gomen deliver thier promises.You can continue barking & shouting after all promises are meant to be broken…DB itself has shown us the trick!!!!!!

  26. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 12:59 pm

    Unggal Pensioner/Telaga Kumang

    I refer to your comment – Pensioner on March 7th, 2010 12:12 pm and Telaga Kumang on March 7th, 2010 12:46 pm respectively

    DB weblog does not belong to me, it belong to Dr. JBA personally. The propagative of publishing “Tintin-Tinjau” is his personal vision/goal and I am in no jurisdiction to comment beyond it. You may ask him straight in this blog; for I will only responsible to answer any question arise at my best opinion – ‘dengan izin’ when such question is directed to me and/or part of my article(s).

    PUBLISHING & PRINTING PRESSES ACT 1984

    To my knowledge; anyone who want to publish a printing material for public needs to apply to KDN under the “Publishing and Printing Presses Act 1984″ is a Malaysian statute governing publishing and the usage of printing presses in Malaysia.

    The Act provides that it is a criminal offense to possess or use a printing press without a licence granted by the Home Affairs Minister (KDN). The Minister is given “absolute discretion” in the granting and revocation of licences. Should one possess or use an unlicensed printing press, he may be imprisoned for up to three years and/or fined up to RM20,000. A deposit made under Section 10 of the Act will also be forfeited in such a case.

    The Home Affairs Minister is given “absolute discretion” to grant, revoke or suspend permits “to any person to print and publish a newspaper in Malaysia” or “to any proprietor of any newspaper in Singapore allowing such newspaper to be imported, sold, circulated or distributed in Malaysia.” Permits are normally granted for the period of one year, and cannot be transferred without the permission of the Minister. Should one print, import, publish sell, circulate or distribute — or even offer to do any of those things — a newspaper without a permit from the Minister, it will be deemed an offense punishable by up to three years in jail and/or a fine of up to RM20,000.

    NOTES:

    DB has no intention or whatsoever to promote any ‘false hope’ as stated by you ‘Pensioner’ but promoting more “HOPE & AWARENESS” for our Bansa Dayak to move forward from poverty driven BN regime – 47 years is enough of hardship, racial discrimination, marginalization, bulldozation, and so on.

    Unfortunately, BN has wasted those precious times given by the rakyat or the rayat of Sarawak as trustee to fulfill rakyat needs and interest but instead for their personal gains. Enough is Enough; it time for Change & Reformation: Change WE Must!!

    Conclusion: “BN TU BANSA NGEMULA – BANSA NGEMELI – BANSA NGERAMPAS – BANSA NGUPAS – BANSA NGULUN – BANSA NGEMARUH – BANSA NUMPANG – BANSA NGUAI!!! 47 TAUN SIGI UDAH CUKUP MAYOH BUKTI UKAI NYA SARI-DUA TAUKA SETAUN-DUA”. Change WE Must!!

    Munyi ka jako sida laut BN: “Nak tolong seribu daya – Tak nak tolong seribu dalih”

    Cheers!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa….!!!

  27. Cikgu Iban on March 7th, 2010 1:01 pm

    Anderson Melintang on March 7th, 2010 8:31 am Tabi Kaban (nuju GMK2020)

    SEMUA SKIM PERINTAH MANAH, MANSANG KA RAKYAT

    Kaban GMK 2020, your article is totally misleading “accusing govt killing people”. Don’t be too harsh with your statement…

    In SWk, the scheme B were in Melugu, Meradong and Lambir.
    …………………………………………..

    Sorry, GKM2020.

    This post has been directed to you but I am interested to know something about the success of the schemes in those areas. Just like anything else, the government can implement all sorts of development projects but the most important thing people always overlook is the RESULT/OUTCOME of each scheme.

    If the schemes are successful in MELUGU and LAMBIR and MERADONG, how many Ibans have become millionaires through their participation? Any?
    Half a millionaire is so much different from a millionaire.

    Well, the government is not actually killing its people by cutting their throats or involving bloodshed. Of concern to us is the endless policies designed to sideline the Ibans adopted by the government.

    Lack of transparency in the JV is one of the many examples of such systematic killing. Prompt DELIVERY of what is PROMISEd by the YBs, if not honoured immediately, is an another kind of killing. Therefore, please do not get yourself confused!!!

    Cheers…

  28. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 1:11 pm

    Cikgu Iban,

    Many thanks on your kind and factual comments.

    Guess that is what I really means by “munoh”: sidelined, marginalize, deprive, cheated, twisted and scam into bogus yet unfavorable scheme.

    How about “bulldozer policy” as exhibited at Rh. Nor Nyawai/ Rh. Nyawin/ many others could also means “munoh” when all their food, clothes and shelter have been demolished to the ground-level? Who make this inhuman policy?

    Thank you in anticipation and may God bless you and your family with good health, love, peace and righteousness.

    Regards, gkm2020

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa….!!!

  29. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 2:41 pm

    Unggal Pensioner,

    Your comment refer: Pensioner on March 6th, 2010 8:47 am

    “Kaban semua,

    Judging from the tone of their posting it goes without saying that majority or 99.9% of DB bloggers do not understand or refused to know the Iban Adat and Custom. “:Iban Budi Bahasa” is simply not in their vocabulary or in their way of life.

    In view of the foregoing I encourage bunch of DB to attend a talk on Iban culture heritage to be held the State Library, Kuching on 11/3, beginning 2.30pm. The one-hour talk will feature on Iban Adat and culture to be delivered by official from Adat Istiadat. Admission is free.”

    Aku tu agi ingat ka komen diatas; alu bedau nerima utai ditanya aku ngagai nuan. Aku minta nuan bejurai ka nya….??

    My question refer: gkm2020 on March 6th, 2010 11:51 am

    Let me ask you these few basic questions:

    - Nama reti ‘ngelaban’?
    - Nama reti ‘adat’?
    - Nama kabuah Iban niri ka rumah panjai?
    - Berapa bengkah adat dikamuan kitai Iban?

    *Uji nuan pejurai ngagai kami ditu!

    Agi nganti saut nuan aku tu ngal. Terima kasih.

  30. Merakat anak Piun on March 7th, 2010 3:43 pm

    Telega Kumang……

    What impact will Tintim Tnjau give if it is published as scheduled? Will it stop Rumah Nor from being bulldozed?

    For you Telega Kumang, DL, JB and the goons…just continue on with your claim policy of “open heart, legs and arms as one day as the law of nature will always be, you will regret that the bulldozer will enter your open legs.

    Yes…yes…yes… we DB together with our madi gkm2020 will continue to bark and shout that BN’s land policy is “SKIM “MUNOH” RAYAT”

    DB…Change we must and can …. satu. dua, tiga …Hoooo….Haaaa.

  31. julaw on March 7th, 2010 3:56 pm

    dayaklama & gang.

    Apai-indai aku enggau Salcra sereta kami semenoa muka ladang sawit taun 80han. Enggi kami sebilik 6 bidang tanah ke bisi getah, engkabang, kayu kampong, buah enggau utai bukai ke beguna ba kitai iban.

    Mula ia kayu, getah, engkabang enggau kayu bukai ditebang lalu dijual Salcra nadai madah,lalu asil kayu ari semua 6 iti bidang tanahnya ke ingat aku RM1000,lalu engkabang ke ditebang sida bisi 60 pun,asil kayu diberi sida iya sepul aja unggal.

    Ditu kitai berati ke maya ke ngepun pan sida salcra tu udah nipu, bedau maya udah bebuah. Ketemu aku asil dalam setaun max RM3000. Reti ia sebulan semina RM250 aja.

    Tang pemerinsa ia, kampung nyau nadai agi, orang ke gawa dia orang indon aja,orang ke master mind tu kaban orang pbb. Maya nya tanah lalu disukat, diberi pala, tanah ke enda temu orang ngempu semua diempu kaban pbbnya unggal, enggau niang yb kami suba unggal.

    Enggi orang dua iku tu nyau maioh agi tanah seduai ari kami ke ngempu menoa unggal. Nya meh gaya, ‘arap ke pagar pagar ga makai padi’ unggal-unggal.

    Conclusion; ia unggal, kebun sawit bisi enggau Salcra, tang lalu bedau ngasai ke penguntong tu unggal.

    Aku kurang setuju, ngadu ke kitai iban cara nanam sawit,laban penemu aku, bisi undang baruh mee kaban-kaban.

    Mupok dulu. Idup Iban Idup Dayak. oooohhhhaaaa….

  32. Merakat anak Piun on March 7th, 2010 3:57 pm

    Madi gkm2020….

    Sorry to say that the pensioner will and shall not know how to answer your questions

    Your know what he know?????… He only knows how and continues to recieve RM2,000 donation from Sung Swee Hua and will support with all his heart and soul to get Sung’s Baby boy Larry to represent Kapit in the most important law making body in Sarawak. No wonder, Kapit is still still disconnected by road from the rest of Sarawak regon. Whata shame????

    You know Sarawak to them is still 1800 century and there is nobody in Kapit who has the skill and experience…so Sung’s Baby is the most ideal.

    Oh Kapit…oh Kapit, where are your past skillful and experience warriors that you were being proud of already….

    DB…Change we must and can …. satu. dua, tiga …Hoooo….Haaaa.

  33. Iban Abroad on March 7th, 2010 4:15 pm

    DB,

    Do not run away from our finger to point out that BN is Perintah Munoh Rakyat and BN JV Scheme Policy on Dayak NCR Land is Scheme Munoh Rakyat. We shall said it again and again, highlight it to rural people, pass to our generation, tell our young people in school and every where and do not stop.

    Instead we shall proud of it. It is nothing contradicted with ISA. It is recommended by United Nation and praise by developed country like USA and European Community. Do not be fool with BN tactic to scare us fighting for our right.

    Let we declare our self now, we, DB, are start to bring new idea to young generation of Dayak to protect their right and fight against their enemies that are UMNO, BN and Dayaklama who are always extinguished Dayak Right with systematic way.

    Some of our plan may be unsuccessful toward our job such as Tinting Tinjau but not doesn’t mean that we have lose ground to put forward our voice to condemn miserable setan deed of BN toward Dayak community.

    Fact by fact and hundreds of clear example we have been posted here to note that BN has extinguished the Dayak Right Systematically, discriminated Dayak, margin zed Dayak in other word, BN Perintah Munoh Dayak for the last 47 years.

    Particularly Taib policy maneuvered by UMNO to change the legislative in order to erect Dayak Right, BN JV Scheme to take Dayak NCR land with 60years contract without survey the Dayak NCR Land on Palm Oil Plantation and HEP Dam Project to take Dayak River.

    Now BN try to twist the real story and pay the Dayaklama Group to influence the poor Dayak back to their fool so that they can continue to wrap Dayak NCR Land and scare the educated Dayak from fighting their Right.

    Then BN use Dayaklama try to use people tax 3.4 billions to fool the Dayak. They said this money is too much to help the Dayak and the Dayak shall appreciate it. But they forget it, even Bini Taib account can give 2 Billions USD each to his 4 child on the days she passed away.

    What to say 500 Billions USD from oil and logging industry that BN has been wrap from Sarawak Natural resource since we joining Malaysia Federation.

    Now, how much 3.4 Ringgit if compare to Leila Taib account and Sarawak Money that have been taken and used to developed Malaya?

    Even then, BN thro Dayaklama group try to fool Sarawak people again and again particularly the Dayak. Dayaklama try to hiding BN propoganda in order to jeopardize Dayak community in return they get good money, good job, good business from the BN.

    This is the real enemy of the Dayak now a days and the future. Iban tamak in BN, Melayu Tamak in UMNO, China Tamak in SUPP and Melayu-Melanau Tamak in PBB.

    Take in mind that, DL have the power, money and all facilities to help other races to extinguish the Dayak Right and DB use our own money to protect the Right of Poor Dayak. This situation shall not retard us from protecting Dayak Right being demolished by UMNO, Taib, Dayaklama and the rest of the BN.

    Once again I said: BN Perintah Munoh Rakyat. BN JV Scheme is Skim Munoh Rayat. I hope it is very clear to all Dayaklama group.

  34. Akiq Hawong on March 7th, 2010 4:50 pm

    Wat Pensiner,

    Enti PR nyadi perintah, angka senang ga Tinting Tinjau nya dipublish.

    Baka RM3.4B nya, enda nyenyamai ga ngulihka duit nyampau nya. Senang agi publish Tinting Tinjau ari ke ngeluarka duit RM3.4B nya. Tang atas faktor mensia, Tinting Tinjau sigi pedis ka dipublish enti agi ngarapka gomen diatu meri pemendar.

    Enti ka meda rega tanah berega jemah ila, kitai mesti ngasoh perintah ngemansangka iya baka masuk sekim perintah. Peda kita penguntung sida kaban Bidayuh kita ba Borneo Hughland. Chukup berega tanah ba atas bukit nya. Sapa pikir tuchung bukit tau seberega tuchung bukit BH nya.

    Tanah paya pen berega enti kitai nyukong perintah. Peda kita sida ba Kota Smarahan ke ngempu tanah paya gambut dia nyau bisi kedua nya udah nyadi jutawan. Ba penemu aku, aku sigi ka ngaga bandar siti ba menua aku amat meh iya ba ulu din, awakka tanah nyadi berega dia.

    Nya alai. anang lembau nyukong perintah ngemansangka menua diri awakka tanah berega alu kitai ke bisi tanah dia ulih nyadi jutawan sekelip mata. Peda kitai sida Urang Asli ba SM din nyau mayuh sida nya ka nyadi jutawan ila.

    Idup gomen, sukong meh gomen enti ka nyadi jutawan.

  35. raja merom on March 7th, 2010 4:58 pm

    Anang ngenusah diri bekelikoh ba blog tu nuan unggal Changop, DL enggau TK. The perintah do not have to worry much if they have done their job well. As you say the perintah is always and forever helping the rakyat. Come election time, anjong selipar aja, enda ibuh kempen ulih meh menang, enda pia?

  36. P.E on March 7th, 2010 6:11 pm

    Aya udah Penchen,

    Nuan nya udah pencen lalu penemu nuan endang munyi penemu orang udah pencen. Jabu anak Numpang pan patut pencen sama enggau nuan. Jabu nya nyau abis penemu lalu Jabu kita nya semina nasal ke pemansang bala Dayak Iban.

    Rauh rauh madah ke menua Betong maju maioh pemansang. Nama pemansang menua Betong??? Ke dipeda aku tak maioh endar orang di Betong bejual ke getah basah- BEJUAL KE GETAH BASAH.

    Aku ke nyebut tu ukai deka bejai kitai orang Betong tang deka madah ke sida DL sida Jabu ke selala rauh rauh madah ke menua Betong maju.

    Uji kitai nemuai ngagai pasar Betong leboh ari enam/minggu-kitai meda pemaioh apek bayat ke bakasindau di pasar Betong. Ba pemaioh apek bayat nyangka nadai menua bukai maioh ari apek bayat iban menua Betong- ba tu menua Betong sigi nombor satu. Syabas Jabu laban ngaga menua Betong pengabis maioh apek bayat iban.

    Pensioner, enti penemu kurang manah tak dudok diau jenoh nganti diri ke parai. Anang mai nembiak ke deka ngemaju ke diri tesat runding.

  37. Merakat anak Piun on March 7th, 2010 6:49 pm

    Kaban Akiq Hawong….. Aku seteju ngau joko nuan.

    But Sorry this statement is not quite right.

    “Peda kita penguntung sida kaban Bidayuh kita ba Borneo Hughland. Chukup berega tanah ba atas bukit nya. Sapa pikir tuchung bukit tau seberega tuchung bukit BH nya” This is NOT TRUE…..maybe some DL group may tell this.

    The reality is, it is the same strategy as a “SKIM “MUNOH” RAYAT” maybe worst than Agriculture schem, apply to the BH Resort corporation. Anyone don’t believe me, go and find more for yourselves and tell me how much those millions go back to the Bidayuh.

    For me aku nemu amat amat…anang nanya aku how????

    “SKIM “MUNOH” RAYAT” happen to Bidayuh NCR land. We are all in the same boat…DB…Change we must and can …. satu. dua, tiga …Hoooo….Haaaa

  38. kelingmenua1 on March 7th, 2010 7:04 pm

    Di ambi ari Article ti di tulis Prof Ramy Bulan.

    Dayak Baru:

    Maioh bala YBs enda tentu nemu pasal ti di kumbai orang Tu MODEL BARU tauka penemu baru, Ari nya kitai ninga sida ia bajako tak sengapa utai leboh ti bejalai nemuai ka rumah panjai, ari ti nerang ka hal-hal ti sebenar ia ngaggai bala rakyat, sida ia mega tak ngeratak Tuai Rumah, Enti sema sida tu enda setuju enggau penemu project JV Joint Venture tauka projek bakongsi.

    Dia sida tuai rumah enggau sida serumah enggau rumah bukai ti enda setuju ka pangawa bakongsi tu. Dia sida enda di beri projek ari printah ti betuai ka BN laban ketegal sida ti enda setuju enggau pangawa bakonsgi tu. (JV). Serta mega Hal-hal utai bukai.

    Kitai Dayakbaru mesti ka nemu enggau silik pekara ti di kumbai MODEL BARU jadi kena kita nambah ka penemu penglandik mekanisme awak ka kitai oleh ngelala tempat ti meri kitai DAYAK, Tanah Dayak, sida ti empu Tanah ngaggai pekara ti nadai meri nguntong ka kitai. disadvantageous

    Penemu bakongsi (Concept of the Joint Venture)

    Enda kurang ari 5000 ikar pemesai – LCDA deka nyadi pengurus tauka di kemata ka ijen-ijen

    Ba pemula ia ianya pra-syarat, dia bisi ba blok-blok tanah ti enda kurang ari 5000 ikar pemesai ianya mungkur antara menua meraka sekeda rumah panjai enggau tumpok pendiau. Lalu ia kediatu nya sida LCDA ti di lantik jadi wakil ngemata ka pagawa enggau hasil nya.

    a) Tiap-tiap orang ti ba-empu ka tanah deka meri tanda tangan sida ia ba surat perjanjian ka pemendar ka agensi-agensi perintah bejalai ka pangawa ti betul , minat, bagi serta enggau ladang dandang besai ti ba tanah nya.

    b) Agen-Agen perintah deka masuk ngaggai rakan kongsi lalu deka ngaga kompeni dikumbai Private cooperation. Lebih kurang koporasi persendirian.

    c) Dini endor tempat ti di tanda lalu jadi ka pemasang dagang, dia menteri meh orang ti nerang ka menua enggau tanah nya deka di kemasang ba baruh section 11 AKTA tanah hak kuasa ngamaju ka tanah Akta 1981 lalu tanah nya deka di kumbai tanah nya deka di kumbai tanah adat bangsa asal ti termaktub Sekyen 9 (C ) ianya AKTA Tanah.

    d) Sida opis survey deka ngena sistem ti di kumbai orang (GLOBE Position) matau menua ti di pejalai ka kompeni ( JVC ) ti deka madah ka berapa pemesai menua nya.

    e) Udah pala tanah nya di keluar ka ngaggai kompeni JVC ka penglama 60 tahun (ianya dua kali tanam pra musim) ti di setuju enggau ungkos.

    f) Jadi tuan tanah nya meh antara sida ia ti bakira ka ni pemesai tanah sida ia tauka pemegai tanah lalu nama-nama sida deka di senarai dalam surat perjanian ti di gaga lawyer. Ba section 18 Akta Tanah ba sapanjai 60 tahun ti jadi ka koperasi lalu di kemendar ka mentri.

    g) Semua orang ti enggau deka bercampur-campur tauka berggabung.

    h) Tuai opis survey tauka supertindent ba opis tanah enggau survey mega nyanka ka ngeluar ka tanah ti sewa tauka di kontrak ngaggai semua tanah ti deka di kemasang ka menua nya.

    Bakani ko cara syer nya di bayar enggau di bagi?

    Ari ti ngira ti ngena (Sewa tauka kontrak) Tanah adat bangsa asal. Kompeni JVC deka ngeluar ka wakil tauka wali unit syer ba utang-utang JCV ti udah penuh di bayar, Sebaka enggau 60 per cent rega tanah nya, ti ngari ka 30 per cent di keluar lalu deka di bayar ngaggai Kopeni JVC.

    Ari nya rega tanah nya tadi di agar siti tiang survey (One Pegged) ianya RM1200.00 sa-ikar. Kompeni JCV deka mayar syer ia enti sama enggau 40 per cent enggau rega ia. Ari semua duit nya tadi 30 per cent deka di simpan ba bank ti di kemendar ka perintah syer lalu ia ke 10 per cent aja deka di bayar ngaggai orang-orang ti ba-empu ka tanah.

    Wakil tauka Wali deka di bayar 10% tuai lalu pihak pemaju deka di bayar 60% Syer.

    Enti sema perjanjian, lalu wakil nya deka di bayar tuai 10% ti di keluar ari syer model serta private kompeni developer deka di bayar 60% ba syer, pia mega tuan tanah deka di bayar 30% ba (equity) JCV deka mayar niteh ka rega tanah. Lalu tanah nya tadi semina aja oleh dikena ka projek-project ti batanam lalu Kopemi JCV enda oleh ngena nya kena ngaloan duit sebagai jaminan laban ti deka ngator pangawa dia, enti ia enda di kemendar ka Menteri.

    Nama penyadi enti udah abis sign surat perjanji ba pala tanah ia ke 60 tahun nya?

    Enti perjanjian nya udah abis ba masa 60 taun, Sida ti baempu tanah nya patut meri keputusan sama ada sida ia ka deka nyambung pala tanah lalu meri ngaggai JCV tauka sida ia minta tanah nya sida tauka kompeni bukai semua nya deka ngena surat enti sema sida ngalantik orang bukai.

    Enti sema tanah adat nya deka ka tanah sida di bagi-bagi lalu di serah ngaggai siko-siko. JCV meh orang ti bekuasa ti nyukat tanah sereta deka meri pemutus enggau patut enggau adil enggau saksama ngaggai tanah ti di bagi-bagi ka nya tadi, hal tu mega nyanka ka lama ngaggai tiap-tiap iko sida ti empu tanah ianya sida ti minat ka tanah nya. Ba perkara tu ti magi-magi ka lot tanah, syer nyangka deka ningal ka maioh penangul laban ti enda tentu temu tentang pemesai tanah enggau orang ti ba-empu ka syer ba tanah nya.

    Projek Pilot

    Dua iti projek printis skim ti ngamasang udah di kerja di kumbai projek penerabai bilun ianya ba sitak
    Baram enggau ba Kanowit (Ngidang 1997:75; Songan enggau Sindang 2000: 251) enggau bermacam pinta enggau tanya ari sida ti terlibat.

    Maioh ti terlibat enggau projek tu ianya enda nemu enggau penuh nama reti rancangan orang luar ti di peraya lalu masuk jadi rakan kongsi tauka masuk syer ba kompeni samasakli entailed. Tu mega tau jadi ka tanda tanya ianya sida tu udah di terang ka enggau silik lalu dipadah ka bala perunding lalu madah ka persetuju sida ia sebagai orang ti enggau ba projek nya.

    Ba seysen ti bukai dia kitai berandau ka hal-hal tauka undang-undang asal orang ti diau dia ti basangkut paut enggau beharap enggau di percaya, ambi ka banding bakani ko semua tu perkara tu masuk ngaggai JCV ba surat perjanjian ka sida ti muka tanah bangsa asal, peda meh enti bisi utai ti kurang ka sida ti baempu tanah nya sema sema suart perjanjian tu enda di titih ka.

    Dayakbaru:

    Tulong print article tu lalu padah ka sida. Dia kita deka ngerja pangawa manah laban kitai nadai bisi baju tauka tatarit enggau Syer JV tu.

  39. Akiq Hawong on March 7th, 2010 7:07 pm

    Pelaba ke aku tentu adai si sida Bidayuh ngempu tanah ba tuchung Bukit nya. Semua tanah dia nya State land memagang, nya alai untung amai meh sida BH Corp nya. Perintah ke meri sida tanah nya deh. Free nya. Ba Bidayuh, sida angka ngumbai tuchung bukit nya nadai rega kelia menya, nya alai sida enda merimba kampung gun kampung jerung dia nyadi tanah NCR sida iya. Penemu aku datas nya semina ambi ke banding aja, kaban aku Merakat.

    Bah..dini agi kitai ka ngemansang ke menua deh. I think, I propose Kpg Benuk to be the new town centre so that the Bidayuh lands in the area have high values to make them instant millionaires. There are already many of them who live like a millionaire today, driving luxury vwhicles although their gaji are small.

  40. Akiq Hawong on March 7th, 2010 7:23 pm

    Enti aku baka Igat DS Idihis Jala, sigi menua Bario nya meh dimajuka aku nyadi siti perbandaran besai ba menua tu. Manah amat menua nya. Nyau asai ke diau ba menua Landan. Kapa ka ke Landan ketegal deka nyepi cuaca ke chelap enti kitaiudah bisi menua kitaiempu ke asai ba menua England nya. Gaga jalai memanah ke Bario kin alu besambung agai menua Kalimantan kin awakka iya baka Pulau Batam neh. Enggau nya, rega tanah ba Bario deka niki. Nya alai sapa sida Kelabit ke mayuh tanah alu nyual iya deka nyadi instant millionaires. Nya alai, enti ka mansang, ka kaya jampat, anang enggai kitai ngansak sida gomen ngaga pemansang ba menua kitai, au!

    Peda kitai sida china ke datai ari menua Chantung nya ke diau ba sebelah bandar ba pasar ke bisi meli tanah sida dayak diatu nyau nyadi instant millionaires kemaya ari tu. Nah! Sigi amat endar penemu Igat Dayaklama nya. Anang enggai nyukong sekim perintah. Makai tai bai perintah, makai tai meh kitai awakka pemansang senang datai agai menua kitai alu kitai ke bisi tanah bisi nasit deka nyadi jutawan enti bisi urang meli tanah kitai ke udah digaga pala ketegal ke nyukong gomen.

  41. John Jamban on March 7th, 2010 10:00 pm

    Tabi GMKbodo,

    I agree with some my friend bloggers here, your words are too harsh, accussing the govt land scheme formulated to munoh dayak.

    I hope one day you will summoned by ISA like other HINDRAF member. Are you look one of them.

    Don’t worry once you out from the detention camp you will be popular like other opposition party member, MP Jayakumay.

    Nya aja kaban

  42. gkm2020 on March 7th, 2010 11:58 pm

    Unggal John Jamban,

    Don’t get me wrong I’m giving awareness and guidance to our people (Bansa Dayak) so that they will be more progressive in Politics, Economic, Social, Technology, Law and Environment.

    That’s why we call ourselves as DB so that we would NOT be called lack of smartness….

    Sarawak is our “Native Land” I’d not want to see it gone before our own eyes….its the only heritage (tanah pesaka) we have.

    By the way, my name is not Jayakumay….he is “Tambi” and I’m Iban/Dayak…enda sama kaban…

    But don’t you worry when I’m out of the jamban I always feel relief….”please release me – let me go”…belagu karaoke dulu ngal…just joking with you kaban.

    Cheers!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa….!!!

  43. Merakat anak Piun on March 8th, 2010 12:08 am

    Akiq Hawong…..

    All the land surrounding the BH area are NCR land and similar to Iban area, the gomen would not give title to those land so that BN gomen can take the land for almost free and eventually create the title. Now per lot of land at BH area, it runs by hundred thousands or millions. Who benift from it…only God knows.

    Including Benuk, almost all the land in that area are without title and if the so called bandar baru come there as proposed by you kaban Akiq Hawong, the Bidayuh will be pushed out just like those bidayuhs who are pushed out from the Bengoh Dam area.

    The compensation, a once off payment is a real peanut as compared with the future income from the sale of the water but as far as the Bidayuh is concerned they will recieve nothing from that. So how to have a Bidayuh millionaires by this kind of develoment. One or two Bidayuh ONLY may be receiving fat pay(RM15,000 – RM20,000 per month) but it is only a short term measure as to buy the heart and mind of the Bidayuh but the bidayuh don’t own the business and so the big buck goes somewhere else.

    You know who is the developer and eventually the operator of Bengoh Dam? Not the Bidayuh kaban????

    This also apply to the owner of NCR land in Kampung Mambong. You may see many factories around the kampung but non are owned by any Bidayuh. How can a bidayuh become a millionaire?

    That’s why DB called it “SKIM “MUNOH” RAYAT” change we must and Can….satu. dua, tiga …Hoooo….Haaaa

  44. Iban Abroad on March 8th, 2010 1:35 am

    BN, Perintah Munoh Dayak.

    Jako ngumbai BN, Perintah Munoh Dayak lalu politik menoa Sarawak ke betuai ka Taib nya Politik Munoh Dayak, enda oleh dikelari, enti kitai meratika pengawa sida Melanau enggau China dalam BN ke megai perintah menoa kitai Sarawak disabong orang UMNO.

    Maia Jugah nyain surat janji Sarawak masuk Persatuan Malaysia, dia 18 pekara ke dibentangka Jugah enda dipasuka UMNO dalam sejarah ke diajar ngagai anembiak sekola. Salinan surat nya dilalaika Melayu sampaika seharitu. Iya ke patut, 18 pekara nya patut nyadi siti sylabis ba sejarah menoa kitai.

    Udah merdeka, SNAP menang lalu Kalong dipaduka nyadi Ketua Mentri Sarawak tang penuduk Kalong dibuai ngena chara paksa oleh KL.

    Tu chara KL ngerampas kuasa Kalong endor sida meri penuduk KM ke bansa Melanau Islam sampaika seharitu. Ke patut, bansa Iban patut diberi peluang nyandang pengawa KM laban sida ke maioh tubuh, tang peluang tu nadai dalam plan UMNO enggau PBB.

    Udah penuduk KM dirampas KL ari tangan bansa Dayak, dia UMNO ngasuh bala Melanau Islam belubah-lubah ngatur cara enggau polisi ngena cara politik nyekat pengidup bansa Dayak ke dikumbai aku ditu Polisi Munoh Dayak.

    Ari nya Politik Pembangun ke ditaja Taib dipejalaika bala Dayak ari BN kena ngumpan undi bansa Dayak dirumah panjai, ngemula ka sida deka ngemansang ka menoa pesisir awak ka maju baka di Malaya tang nadai kala ke nyadi.

    Bala BN nemu pemerinsa bansa Dayak ke deka beguna ka jalai raya, paip ai, api letrik, arus talipaun, pemanchar TV, atap zinc, subsidi, duit sagu ati maia bepilih, dia sida meri utai tu mimit ngagai rumah panjai, digalau kena ngumpan undi orang rumah panjai ke dudi ila.

    Ari nya orang rumah panjai terpaksa ngundi BN ngicha ka BN ke beumpan ka Politik Pembangun BN ke betuaika Taib tau nambah ka pemansang mendua mit. Ditu kitai ninga BN ngeretak bansa Dayak enda ngasuh ngelaban perintah, laban sapa ke ngelaban perintah ngundi pembangkang enda diberi projek.

    Bala wakil pembangkang enda diberi peruntukan ngemansang ka rakyat. Ari nya bala BN becontoh ka wakil Pembangkang nadai oleh ngemajuka rakyat. Ke bendar peruntukan BN enggau pembangkang nadai tau bechiping.

    Projek di menoa pesisir nadai kala tembu tang duit ke diberi KL tiap tahun udah tebasau belama kena BN Sarawak bejalai ka Politik Pembangun ngumpan undi orang rumah panjai awak ke enda putus-putus nyukong BN.

    Ditu kitai ninga riport aro Ag madah ka 60% duit Sarawak nadai temu tungga dilalaika bala BN. Ba tu kitai senang endar macha politik BN ke munoh rakyat, pemansang rumah panjai nadai kala diberi enggau ati iklas tang diberi enggau penemu kepapas ka bansa Dayak.

    Ari kuasa KM diempu Melanau udah dirampas UMNO ari jari Kalong, dia Taib enggau aya iya Rahman Yakub bekaul enggau bansa China ngerampas kayu kampung ke digalau aki-ini bansa Dayak.

    Semoa bala anak, kaban belayan Taib enggau Rahman diberi lisen magang sampai anak ke agi nusu kena ngulih ka duit ari kayu-ramu bansa Dayak.

    Ditu kitai meda bansa China nyadi tawkey kayu balak ba menoa kitai udah bekungsi pengawa ngereja nebang kayu rimba bansa Dayak. Bansa Dayak menoa nya empu diambi kerja kena ngelalai ke pengawa sida ngerumpak kayu balak bansa Dayak awak ke enda nyadi pengachau.

    Udah Kayu balak dijual, rega ke bebillion ringgit dibagi Melanau enggau China ke ngujung ka Taib seduai Rahman kaya jampat penapat inat.

    Ingat kita bini Taib, Leila Taib meri 2 Billion USD ke 4 eko anak iya sebedau iya mati.

    Udah Taib kaya, kuasa ekonomi Sarawak dipegai iya ngena cara bedagang Ali-Baba ngadu ke syarikat bala anak-bini iya begulai enggau bansa China. Ari nya mimit aja bisnis ke untung besai diberi tauka diadu ka bansa Dayak kena nyekat bansa Dayak kaya enggai ka oleh numbuh ka parti ke kuat numbang ka kuasa iya.

    Ari nya bansa Dayak dalam BN terpaksa nundok ka Taib ngicha ka Taib oleh meri kontrak ke manah agi lalu bisi agi untong nyadi jutawan.

    Ketegal nundok ka Taib, dia bala YB Dayak terpaksa nitih ka peneka perintah Taib, laban sapa ke enda mending ka iya deka dibuai nyadi pengari tauka dibuai pengawa tauka ditarik pulai bisnis ke udah nyadi.

    Udah Taib nemu YB Dayak nadai daya agi ngelaban iya, sejarit nunduk ka iya dia Taib berengkah ngurang ka bansa Dayak masuk Universiti awak ka bansa Dayak kurang megai pengawa perintah enggau kompani.

    Ditu kitai meda semina 5% aja orang ke kerja perintah diberi ngagai kitai Dayak enti dibanding enggau Melayu-Melanau 85% taja pan tubuh kitai dua kali lipat maioh agi ari sida.

    Pengawa Taib ke disukong UMNO ngurang ka Dayak bekerja dalam perintah ukai naka tu aja. Sida mai maioh ka agi orang Malaya datai 30,000 iko bekerja di Sarawak kena ngalah ka bansa Dayak ari megai pengawa. Ditu kitai meda sampai polis tauka Cikgu Kindergarden pan diambi ari Malaya.

    Jauh nyebut 18 perkara ke dirintai ka Jugah ngasuh perintah meri peluang ngagai bansa Dayak megai pengawa perintah ba menoa Sarawak empu. Ditu mega kitai meda 90% anak Dayak nyadi penganggur nadai pengawa udah abis sekola. Tu meh dikumbai Politik Munoh Dayak.

    Dalam pengawa sida megai perintah dia Taib ke dipaduka UMNO ngindik bansa Dayak di menoa Sarawak lalu secara belalai muai bup ensera Iban, muai surat Nendak, ngerubuh rumah Dayak lalu nyekat rumah Dayak ditumbuhka baru.

    Enda cukup nya, UMNO ngena Dewan Nengeri Sarawak ngasuh Taib ngubah undang-undang nengeri Sarawak endor nukar tanah asal NCR Dayak awak ka tau nyadi State Land, muai bansa Dayak ari borang kerajaan menoa Sarawak, nyetop jako Allah Taala ba bup Injil bansa Iban.

    Ari nya, perintah BN ke betuai ka Taib lalu penegar diri ngerubuh rumah Dayak, ngerampas tanah NCR Dayak serta nekat ai sungai ke dikembuan bansa Dayak.

    Ditu kitai meda 40 pintu rumah panjai dipindah enggau pampasan 300 Ringgit seikar kena nekat Wong Irup, 60 pintu Rumah Nor di Bintulu disungkur perintah BN enggau tractor siang ari, siko anak Penan beumur 10 tahun dirogol driver orang BN ngandung ka anak nadai apai nadai dikena ukum, anak indu penakan Iban-cina dikumbai BN orang datai ukai bansa Dayak, gangster ari Miri datai ke rumah panjai di menoa Niah ngeretak bansa Dayak ngasuh nyerah ka tanah asal sida ke dirampas kompani ari BN, 200 iti case saman bansa Dayak ngelaban perintah ke ngerompak tanah Dayak ditangguh sampai 10 tahun enda temu tungga.

    Ngena kuasa Dewan Undang Nengeri Sarawak mega UMNO ngasuh Taib ngubah sitak nengeri Sarawak enggau pemaioh tubuh pengundi di menoa Sarawak kena ngalah ka sitak enggau tubuh bala Dayak.

    Sitak nengeri bansa Melayu ditambah maioh ka agi, lalu sitak nengeri majoriti bansa Dayak dikurang ka. Bepuluh ribu iko bansa Indonesia diambi kerja belalai di Ladang Kelapa Sawait di Miri lalu diberi kad nyadi rakyat asal menoa Sarawak kena ngalah ka pemaioh penyampau tubuh bansa Dayak. **Nyadi tu lebih ari chukup jako madah ka BN nya perintah Munoh Rakyat.

    Angka sekeda bala ari BN agi ka nanya DB baka ni atur kena ngemajuka bansa Dayak lalu kena ngatur pemansang menoa Sarawak. Cara iya senang aja. Titih ka aja polisi PR ke deka ngemansang ka bansa Dayak enggau menoa Sarawak.

    Pulai, adu serta dipejalaika ka baru janji 18 Perkara ke ko Jugah maia Sarawak masuk Malaysia. Badu agi betalat ka jako enggau penemu.

    Polisi PR udah cukup manah lalu lebih ari umbas kena ngemansang ka bansa Dayak enggau menoa Sarawak.

    a) PR deka mulai ka 20% asil minyak menoa Sarawak,
    b) PR deka meri kuasa Ketua Mentri Sarawak ngagai bansa Dayak,
    c) PR deka nerit ka agi undang-undang makai suap kena nyekat sida ke makai suap,
    d) PR deka bechara ke orang ke disangka bisi makai suap bebillion ringgit mulaika duit rakyat kena ngemansang ka Sarawak nyengkaum Taib empu,
    e) PR deka nyukat tanah asal NCR bansa Dayak sebedau dimajuka,
    f) PR deka meri surat pala tanah Dayak ke udah sukat,
    g) PR deka ngaga plan ngamajuka menoa Sarawak awak ka pemansang jampat agi setanding enggau Malaya,
    h) PR deka ngaduka maioh agi bansa Dayak masuk Universiti ngambi pangkat ke besai agi,
    i) PR deka ngurang ka bala Dayak nyadi penganggur lalu nganti orang Malaya ke bekerja di Sarawak,
    j) PR deka meda maioh agi Dayak aktif ba pengawa Dagang,
    k) PR deka mai MARA ngaga maioh agi rumah kedai ke bansa Dayak,
    l) PR deka meda investor maioh agi masuk ke Sarawak ngaga kilang,
    m) PR deka nyekat SCORE ke nguntung ka bala BN aja,
    n) PR deka meda bisness ba industri minyak maioh agi diberi lalu nguntong ka orang Sarawak.
    o) PR deka ngadu ka kolej beciri ke kerja ba kompani minyak endor bansa Dayak bekerja.

    **Nyadi polisi PR tu nadai bisi siti ba plan parti BN.

    Nyadi udah kitai meda polisi perintah BN ke sentiasa deka munoh bansa Dayak dia kitai meratika pengemun kitai rumah panjai enggau sekeda bala sida Sirat Politikal Mentality ke agi kering amat nyukong polisi BN ke munoh diri empu.

    Pesan nagagai kitai rumah panjai. Nyadi enti kitai rumah panjai serbana ka anak diri nadai kerja di menoa diri abis belelang ke menoa orang ngiga pengawa anang nyalah orang bukai tang nyalah kitai rumah panjai empu enggau sapa ke agi nyukong BN.

    Enti kitai rumah panjai serbanaka pemansang nadai enda nitih ka orang Malaya, tanah abis diambi kompani BN kitai anang nyalah orang bukai, tang kitai patut nyalah diri empu. Laban kitai rumah panjai ke nyukong BN ke mai Politik Munoh Dayak.

    Kitai ke ngelak ka BN agi bekuasa majak ngambi orang Malaya bekerja ngalah ka anak kitai ke nadai pengawa. Kitai rumah panjai empu ke ngasoh BN menang nukar undang-undang Tanah NCR Dayak nyadi State Land lalu ngemalu bansa kitai Dayak ba moa mensia masuh ngerubuh 60 pintu rumah Nor di Bintulu siang ari enggau nadai beradat.

    Jako diatas nya udah chukup madah ke kitai, selagi-lagi kitai nyunting BN, nanah ka BN, enda berani ngelaban BN, enda kempang nukar BN selagi nya meh kitai dikemeli ka BN belama-lama. Nadai jalai bukai kena kitai maju kelimpah ari kitai berani, kempang nukar BN.

    Agi ga kitai diatu udah bisi peluang nukar perintah BN ke udah lama megai menoa kitai, ngaga dua iti parti bekuasa megai perintah, BN enggau PR. Udah chukup endor kitai meri peluang ngagai BN.

    Diatu maia kitai rakyat ngajar bala BN ke enda manah serta meri awak ngagai parti enggau ketuai bukai megai perintah. Ba PR kitai bisi orang ke landik serta bepengelaman megai perintah baka BN empu.

    Jako ke bakatu patut diidar ke kitai ke rumah panjai, ukai ba pilih raya ke ka datai tu aja tang mega tiap kali kitai bejalai berandau enggau panggan diri.

    Sapa ke becharamah ngena penemu ke bakatu patut ngaga video lalu sadong ngagai kitai bansa Dayak awak ke sida tumu agi sedar ke bansa diri ke benung diperinsa BN kediatu.

  45. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 7:01 am

    Bah! Kaban Merakat,

    How about the MalayNow in Mukah. Mukah is fast developing cioz our beloved CM stand nearby the town. I am sure there are many MalayNow who are owning the land near the Mukah Town. I guess many of them are almost or millionaires today. Are still going out to the see or planting sago or selling SSh-iot, ulat sago?

    We know that a few ibans in Kota Samarahan had become instant millionaires coz their land were developed for shopping or housing complex. Even the olbest school land was taken over by the generation coz the offer was so good.

  46. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 7:12 am

    Apoo…Igat P.E,

    Kati ku mengeri Betong nya diatu nyau mayuh sida nembiak iban dia nyadi Apek bayat deh. Kati sida nya udah gian ngirup ai kemi apek nya kini?

    Sapa ka ngelaban apek bayat ba sebelah mengeri Kuching ke selalu ngachau pab nya, ba Sri Aman, kita tau ngangau ke sida apek ba menua Betong nya mantu kita munaska apek nya.

    Kati producing so much is something that the Betong representative should be proud of? Arapka sida apek nya diberi pengawa ba ladang sawit ba menua Betong. Kati ka enda ngapek laban nyau nadai pengawa bukai deh. Aku pen enti nadai pengawa, sigi sanggup meh ka ngapek. Apa peduli, sida apek ba menua bukai pen sama siti seput ga. Ukai sida nya tak baka lintah, dipantap nemu nambah.

  47. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 7:14 am

    ………….Kati producing so much APEK-APEK is something that the Betong representative should be proud of? Arapka sida apek nya diberi pengawa ba ladang sawit ba menua Betong. Kati ka enda ngapek laban nyau nadai pengawa bukai deh. Aku pen enti nadai pengawa, sigi sanggup meh ka ngapek. Apa peduli, sida apek ba menua bukai pen sama siti seput ga. Ukai sida nya tak baka lintah, dipantap nemu nambah.

  48. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 7:34 am

    Igat Iban Abroad,

    Perkara 18 iti nya nyau enda relevan agi ke kitai dayak diatu. Perintah nyau enda ulih ngemansang ke menua laban ke kena sekat sida dayak ke agi taluk ke perkara 18 tu.

    Peda kita sida dayak diatu nyau enggai masuk sekim perintah, nyau nagang tanah NCR diri kena dimajuka perintah. Bah…nama utai ulih, tanah ke memesai nya nyau enda diguna kena ngenataika duit perintah kena nulong ngemajuka rayat ila. Nama kebuah?

    Ngelama ke udah merdeka, pengidup sida iban alu empai meruan senang lantang, nyamai. Kira ke enda mujur meh perkara 18 nya deh. Nya alai, sida perintah diatu deka ngaga perkara baru ke manah agi awakka kitai dayak mayuh agi ulih nyadi instant millionaires enti pemansang bisi datai ba menua sida iya.

    Nya alai, anang masau tanah ngapa. Baka ba menua Kuching tu, amat nadai guna amai ga nanam sida pokok bungai. Manah agi nanam pokok rambutan, durian, langsat etc ba sebelah tanah lapang baka roundabout, tisi jalai.

    Enti iya berbuah, bisi ga penguntung iya ulih dikembuah rayat neh.

  49. Telaga Kumang on March 8th, 2010 7:40 am

    gkm2020, a point to ponder!

    Just curious….I do not own any website as such I do not aspect visitors. You have one but haunted,no visitors…..DB seem to shying away or refused to be your followers.May be u can explain in writing.

    Enti ba rumah panjai ruai nadai di tungkut api, nadai baku insap enda temuai ka dudok ba ruai.

    Nya aja kaban.

  50. engkerawai on March 8th, 2010 7:42 am

    JJ Toilet,

    U dont seems to understand the freedom of speech /expressions allocated to us as democratic citizens.

    GKM2020 deserve some level of respect based on his founded elaboration of facts and evidence of misrule/misgovern by our politician. Some of the things mentioned are hard evidence that we all [Dayaks] should pay attention to.

    JJ we are getting impatient for all these predicarment facing the Dayaks.

    We, DB will not rest and watch thing happen, we wish to make things happen for the future of anakbiaks!!

    GKM2020, keep up the good work!!

  51. Telaga Kumang on March 8th, 2010 7:50 am

    Tabi kaban Iban Abroad. Penemu deh endang penemu orang politik ti udah enda popular agi. Baka drop out BN. Tang sebedau deh kempen ka parti orang Malaya manah agi berunding betul2. Kitai Swk patut megai diri empu. Ba penemu aku nadai milih bangsa asal aja orang Swk. Enti deh kala diau di Sbh baru deh nemu asai negeri di pegai orang datai. Nya aja kaban.

  52. Manang Empangau on March 8th, 2010 8:25 am

    Udah ambis meh future menua Sabah nya, nyau nadai agi identiti politik negeri. Nyau nyadi politik Melaya udah meh menua deh. Nadai jalai ulih nyurutka diri enti udah tama bubu entaya ke dipasang ba ai ke deras deh. Kenu ku jaku ka ngontrol sida PATI tang ukai nya ulih dipunas ga sida nya. Nyamai agi munaska sodadu penyelawai, sida kemenis nya.

    Bah…anang kitai ka mai parti ari Melaya din megai mengeri kitai tu. Manah agi kitai megai diri empu ngena parti local. Anang ka import apek bayat ari menua bukai. Manah agi kitai ngelaban sida apek bayat local ngena apek bayat local ga.

  53. Ugly msian on March 8th, 2010 8:41 am

    Dr. Brian, pls delete comment by JJ.He doesn’t appreciate the art of critical and analytical thinking.Munyi JJ baka munyi apek bayat ba sepiak Pulau babi din!!

  54. gkm2020 on March 8th, 2010 10:22 am

    Endu Telega Kumang,

    “Just curious….I do not own any website as such I do not aspect visitors. You have one but haunted,no visitors….DB seem to shying away or refused to be your followers.May be u can explain in writing…”

    Nama meh nuan irau wai madi…..aku empu pin jarang nurun ka umai diatu…

    Utai ka sebut nuannya ukai rumah aku tang ‘langkau umai’ aku sigi sengaja diawaka aku bakanya kena aku ngelait ka ‘abi-besi’ tanah NCR aku ba dunya maya ‘virtual world’….Ha…Ha…Ha…

    Auk…enggai kumbai orang nadai menua ba dunya maya meh wai madi….

    Enti nuan ka berimba tauka nanam padi tisi ‘langkau umai’ aku nya nadai salah wai

    Tang nya meh aku empu diatu sigi jarang endar nurun nemuai ngagai langkau nya sekumbang udah bekerja ba offshore laban nadai pengawa diberi perintah BN…

    Nya aja saut aku ngagai nuan wai madi….Tankayu

    Cheers!

  55. Manang Empangau on March 8th, 2010 11:04 am

    Igat Ugly Msian,

    Anang ga nuan nyau ka kelalu ugly enggau igat JJ nya. Angka naka nya aja ga pengelandik JJ nya bekeritika tingking ditu. Nadai ngawa iya mansut ke buah hunding iya ditu.

    Dini semua kitai ditu nyau sama sebaka pusin bulu tumbung. Bisi meh nya ke dedadak deh.

    Bisi nya baka tudah Aya Apai Jangkam Bulan ga, enggai enda dupah enggau leka pelaga sigi leka jaku ke disebut iya.

    Awak ke iya mansut penemu ditu nitihka basa 1Malaysia ga.

  56. Empelesik Sungai on March 8th, 2010 11:39 am

    “Lutor GKM2020, MT,ES,IA of DB is meddling too much on the agreement with their unpractical approach and so complicated paper works and the developer had to bring back these papers to their lawyer for interpretation and could take another year or two for viewing and reviewing.” Dayaklama

    DayakLama:

    I have no Political Agenda whatsoever even if I am found here. I was in an Iban church last week and we prayed, “Allah Ta’ala, Apai kami di surga.” I shed tears because I don’t know if we can continue calling God “Allah Taala, Apai kami di surga.”

    I’ve stayed in various hotels in Kuching, Sibu and Bintulu and I am met with groups of ustaz and ustazah from W Malaysia. I talked with friends and told that even in primary 3, students are taught “proper” way to pray on a Friday.

    How long can my race survive, Dayak Lama – BN or PR in power nonetheless?

    I have no quarrel with this government, Dayak Lama. I am sad when people come to me with stories of failed JV, stories of non-payment of dividends, encroachments into Dayak Land.

    a) What steps have been taken to address these problems?
    b) Is there any dialog and discussion?
    c) Why do we have to resort to legal actions (even then the gov’t losses)?
    d) Isn’t there a better way than legal actions?
    e) How about (as Empiang Jabu espoused) the government starts to listen to the people?

    Tell me Dayak Lama – is there any thing wrong with that?

    I’d rather we wrong in your eyes than being wrong before my own conscience and God. I know Dayak Baru can’t achieve much but we hope to achieve proper dissemination of knowledge.

    People high up said to me: “Kita tu bejaku ngapa. Nama ulih kita?” On the other hand, who else dare to talk about crying and tears of the longhouse people? Who else dare to talk about people without roads, electric supply, clean drinkable water, jobs discrimination? WHO ELSE?? Tell me Dayak Lama??

    When it comes to NCR-JVs, please enlighten me:

    a) Which JV can really boast to have benefited the Dayaks?
    b) When half of the JVs ended in the high court, what can you as a decent human being conclude (removing your BN skin)?

    Sorry Dayak Lama – I have no quarrel with you or anyone. But that doesn’t mean I compromise what I believe in.

    May the God that I worship bless you.

  57. dayaklama on March 8th, 2010 11:50 am

    Sida DB tu landik bejako tunsang laban belajar ari universiti condong lalu pikir sida ia selalu condong ke sepiak penyakal. Sida selalu madah, enti enda diatu, kemaia, enti ukai kitai, sapa?

    Baka kami DL laban enda mapap runding lalu ngerja ia baka diatu meh kitai masuk sekim sawit JV enggau kompeni ke dipadah ke perintah. Tanah sapa agi deh dianti dipasuk enti ukai tanah kitai Dayak Iban?

    Anang baka Lutor GKM2020 orang udah nyual buah sawit tang enggi ia agi ngaga langgur sempekat kongsi lalu ke balat nanggol JV tu sempekat enda kala disetuju ke JV partner. Bah ni jako peransang kita ke madah enti ukai diatu, kemaya? Enti bakatu taun 3000 pen enda meh nanam buah sawit, maianya ila orang putih udah pindah ke planet bukai lalu sapa ka meli deh?

    Salam 1Malaysia

  58. Manang Empangau on March 8th, 2010 12:07 pm

    Actually, it is really out of date to plant OP. Ukai nya ka nyenyamai ngambi buah ke mesti dijual ngena pemerat tan nya. Aku ke udah tuai tu nyau enda kuat ngangkat ke setandan buah sawit nya.

    Utai ke pemadu manah ditanam nya kayu marijuana, cinnabis. Kayu nya endang nadai nguna tulang ke kuat kena ngangkatka buah, daun, batang iya. Mimit aja dijual, kita pen dibayar mayuh duit ga. Berega amat kayu nya wai. Mesa ni ga sekilo nya; empai mesa didegi ke batang ke kenjo nya tang rega iya amat manah wai. Jampat kitai kaya nyual iya.

    NADAI APAK NANAM SAWIT NYA. UKAI NYA KA MIT MIT TANAH ALAI NANAM IYA.

    Tanam meh kayu garu enti enggai kena ukum gantung ketegal ke nanam dadah.

    Tupi meh ikan empurau enti ka makai ikan nyamai. Enti puas makai ikan nya, tau dijual alu kitai pen ulih kaya nyual ikan nya.

    Enti ka mudal agi, tupi meh sida china dolls nya. Mayuh aja sida aya bujang tuai ke enggai enda nyepi utai ke baru deh. Kelimpah ari nya, kitai tau meh nguna china doll nya enti kaban nyau udah balat engkasak enchego ba alam tanchut din.

    Salam 1Dayak.

  59. MJC on March 8th, 2010 12:34 pm

    From MJC 8/3/2010
    To: DL bloggers and supporters,

    Campaigning for the next state elections has already started. Kindly impress upon Sarawak voters of the FDIs figures released by MIDA last weeks.

    Mida disclosed that in term of FDIs Sarawak not only done better than expect but came up top among all the states in Malaysia. Sarawak under YDK managed to attract FDI to a tune of RM8.45 billions in investment.

  60. John S. Abang on March 8th, 2010 1:07 pm

    Let me tell you simple facts regarding NCR issue in our area.

    1982 Seatex plantation confiscated 560 hectares of our NCR. PL holder at that time is none other than BN top Gun.

    We crying for mercy persuading the gomen to do something on our NCR- pay us accordingly. But that do not materialised.

    2009- Ace possible S/B encroached into our area -clearing approx. 60 hectares of our NCR. We questioned the developer. Their answer, the Gomen give them PL rights.They simply buldozed the NCR area with our “mata jadi merah-We cry.

    In some court cases, Why the Gomen challenged the verdict when the Hkim said that you gomen “Kalah”? Why is it necessary for them to appeal all over again when the verdict is not in your favour???? -Belachan lah.

    I belief there is a grand designs by group of people who try to skin the iban alive so that the Ibans will suffer the rest of their life.Being poor they are always at the mecry-bergantung seumur hidup dengan orang- kaya-kaya to be their slaves-working to built their economic empire.

    To deprive the dayak their NCR land means to kill or suffocating their life. They will naturally die when their NCR land s are taken from them. It is my prediction that this Political economic strategy is parts of a great ethnic cleansing purely to castrate the dayaks.

    We need to change the system that derail our dreams to have a decent and comfortable life. We need the system that promotes equality and fairness. If the dayaks still live in ramshackels or dilapidated houses- Something wrong with gomen delivery and distributing system. So change them while it is not too late.

    Election is the time for you to do that.>>>>>>>.

  61. dayaklama on March 8th, 2010 1:07 pm

    From :Honourable MJC of DL adhoc committee,

    Mida disclosed that in term of FDIs Sarawak not only done better than expect but came up top among all the states in Malaysia. Sarawak under YDK managed to attract FDI to a tune of RM8.45 billions in investment.
    ————————————————-
    If the outside world can see through clearly that Sarawak under the current BN leadership can help them to become more richer, i don’t know why the ” Politics of Development ” would kill the Sarawakian as percieved by DB’s.

    You see FDI-Foreign Direct Investment-orang luar mai duit maioh ke Sarawak melabur beranak ka puku. If this BN is as useless as DB’s always accused, don’t you think these foreigners who have been involved long in bussiness have the confidence to make deal with us? Open your eyes wide DB and when we talked about development, it is the national development DB. I know DB narrow mind will question again, this is not going to benefit the Dayaks/Iban but others.

    Development anywhere in the world will not centre and to benefit only one community. As unggal Changop4540 had said last year, when there is SCORE he can multiply his vegetable sale and indirectly the development will one way or another will increase his income. If he can be employed and work as tukang cat, well this infact another blessing as this is what he can do with his qualification. Be more specific 8.4 billion in real figure is 8,400,000,000.00.

    Salam 1Malaysia

  62. Mayar Utang Taib on March 8th, 2010 1:09 pm

    Remember “How Taib Survived The 1987 Elections” at Sarawak Headhunter’s blog?

    Taib got RM150 million from the five companies. Courtesy of Taib, Sarawak people, especially the NCR landowners are still paying these companies, today.

    Taib will favour big companies over smallholders.

    Taib will not readily issue licences to rear swiftlets on unsurveyed NCR lands because it will make millionaires out of simple-minded indigeneous people. He doesn’t want them to be rich and becoming politically stronger.

    Do you see why this BN under Taib will never survey NCR lands on a big scale? If it is done:

    1. there will be no more NCR lands to grab
    2. Indigenous peoples will use the titles to develop the land
    3. you fill in this space ……….

    Taib will only issue titles if it will benefit him; then again on a piece-meal basis.

  63. gkm2020 on March 8th, 2010 1:13 pm

    Unggal dayaklama,

    Your comment refer: dayaklama on March 8th, 2010 11:50 am

    Thanks for your ‘condong’ comment. Well, my friend I will take it up as a positive challenge.

    Life is never easy it’s full of challenges and that’s where a true leader can be found i.e. those who can overcome that predictable/unpredictable challenge.

    EDUCATION IS PART OF AWARENESS

    I still believe educating others onto the right path is one way of overcoming those challenges other than educating oneself and/or improving your own learning capacity via discussion or forum.

    Teaching or coaching others is about improving your own teaching and coaching skills too. We need to earn skill by learning from awareness which is a key element of education. ‘How would you know if someone have not told you about it…..?’

    A ‘good education’ is a major foundation from which to build other parts of life such as employment, a career and financial security.

    Although access to education has improved significantly for our Bansa Dayak in the last decade, they continue to experience significant issues, some of which are explored below; we still lack of awareness.

    When we lack of awareness, the circumstances behind it other than backwardness, being bullied, discrimination, marginalization, sidelined, oppression, depression, injustice and poverty are:

    a) We lack of information
    b) We lack of ability
    c) We lack of creativity/innovation
    d) We lack of agreement
    e) We lack of allurement
    f) We lack of appreciation
    g) We lack of attention
    h) We lack of belief
    i) We lack of honesty
    j) We lack of candidness
    k) We lack of capacity
    l) We lack of care
    m) We lack of self-esteem
    n) We lack of certainty
    o) We lack of certitude
    p) We lack of understanding
    q) We lack of unity
    r) We lack of confidence
    s) We lack of coherence in our own community
    t) We lack of personal/community growth
    u) We lack of values
    v) We lack of communication
    w) We lack of competence
    x) We lack of positivity
    y) We lack of productivity
    z) We lack of modernization/civilization /progress

    So which is more importance; having ‘positive awareness’ or having ‘negative attitude’? The choice is yours!

    NOTES: LACK OF awareness among landowners about BN ‘bogus scheme’ could see them losing both their native rights and native customary land rights. And that is certainly NOT Right!

    In summary, poverty, backwardness, underserved and unsmart is a situation that is attributed to the lack of awareness of the situation factor.

    By creating awareness; you, me and our community are able to boost a higher level of confidence in handling them i.e. our ‘naïve culture’.

    Re-look our present example and our history, and historical factors

    An understanding of our present needs, demands, scope and context would allows all of us to be more prepared for it – essentially the confidence level for betterment, progressiveness, productiveness, sustainable growth and prosperousness.

    When we lack of awareness – We LACK OF knowing the truth. What truth is 47 years in which you and/or your family and our Dayak community stand today when compare to others?

    Lastly, please keep in mind that confidence and positive growth is about awareness. I hope you will develop a higher sense of awareness, thus boosting the confidence in handling our Dayak situations.

    We cannot be “baru” if we choose to remain “lama”. Remember; we are already in the “digital civilization” and not in “analog civilization”.

    But unfortunately, there’re some who still cannot accept that the world has Change drastically. Change WE Must!

    Cheers!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo….Haaa….!!!

  64. engkerawai on March 8th, 2010 1:57 pm

    Dayaklama pencarut,

    U seems to belittle the DB graduates in yr posting!

    May I ask u, which university is “condong’ in Malaysia?? can you name it?

    The fact is, All the universities in malaysia are full of LAUTs and only just a handful of Dayaks graduated every year from public universities…they only think of the numbers but the qualities of graduates were undermined by the ministry of Higher learning.

    These group of LAUTS graduates will gather strength to colonise the Sarawak and Sabah people. Look at what happened in the school, full of Malaya teachers thus, infiltrate into our community, married the Dayak women etcc….

    Sad to say, most of the senior, executives, top management in the civil service were given to the LAUT from melaya.

    So all these people were graduated from university of Condong for BN or Opposition….???

  65. gkm2020 on March 8th, 2010 2:33 pm

    Unggal engkerawai,

    Universiti ba Malaysia kediatu sigi condong magang2 – condong ngagai bansa Melayu Raya aja…nya meh bansa bukai ‘kecondang’ laban sida iya.

    Selain ari ‘education’ ba hal politik, ekonomi, pengawa (civil service) sereta status bumiputra bansa laut Malaya sigi mayoh condong ngagai bansa sida aja.

    Enti sida majak ngumbai orang bukai condong…nama bisi granti sida enda ‘kecondang’ ila??

    Nya aja madi..

  66. Iban Abroad on March 8th, 2010 2:43 pm

    DB,

    UMNO manauvered BN Sarawak lead by Taib to pursue Sarawak Chinese to creat FDI for invest 11 Billions Ringgit in Sarawak in order to wrap opportunity of the Sarawak Chinese plus Taib Family together with Chinese from China to take Dayak River and NCR in ulu area with a cheap prise 300RM/Acres. This money will be use to build HEP which will give millions of profit to Taib and Chinese.

    In this way UMNO and Taib can erect the Dayak Right on their land and River in future. Which mean Dayak will become more poorer like Iban in Lubok Antu. Being a poor Dayak will be unable to disturb Melanau Dynasty.

    This is the FDI 8.5 Billions going to be as the Dayaklama is said.

    The investment give benefit without distructed Dayak people are never in BN plan of development. Such which high way from Lundu to Lawas, Irrigation paddy field, cottage industry and etc.

  67. dayaklama on March 8th, 2010 5:23 pm

    Honourable Pensioner & DL bloggers,

    Despite uncertainty in global economy, Sarawak BN under YDK & DPC must have done all Sarawakian proud by attracting the biggest size FDI in the whole of Malaysia. Before foreigners came or invest thier capital they must have done the necessary researched and survey and is satified that Sarawak is thier gold mine.

    If they (Foreigners) see opportunities in here I see no reason why DB construed the BN policy as “Skim munuh Rakyat”. In any case those DB who chose to be “kena bunuh” I said may You Rest In Peace (RIP).

  68. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 5:53 pm

    Enda manah amat ga title tu uchu. Ambis hayat kena bunoh lagi. Anang kitai ka semak skim ke munoh rayat. Nadai tuju apak apak nya. Muai masau jam aja. Uji tukar agai title ‘Skim cuba ngenyamai ke pendiau rayat’.

  69. MERAMAT TAJAK on March 8th, 2010 6:23 pm

    Empelesik Sungai on March 8th, 2010 11:39 am ,

    Cool reply.

    I didn’t know that I’m one of the of those … in Dayaklama’s ….the Lutor GKM2020, MT,ES,IA of DB is meddling too much on the agreement with their unpractical approach and so complicated paper works etc etc…

    Perhaps I should weigh in. Just on the JV concept.

    My comment is no different than the objective comments of many others.Its not working as originally envisaged and I think many in the state government knows it too.Thats why SALCRA (1976)-headed by Jabu, gave way to LCDA (1981)-headed by Taib. And the key reasons for the failure (without apportioning blame) – from economics and legal perspective alone, are quite simple:

    1. In both SALCRA and LCDA, the NCR land owners were not by designed,made to be actively involved.Instead they are made to be “equity” partners.Not a bright idea at all – a flawed thoughts. A better development model would demand active participation, no matter how small – by the NCR land owners so that they themselves can begin to develop the necessary agro-business skills to be plantation developers. I have not found any literature on the formation of SALCRA and LCDA that even consider it part of the strategic pillar, to advance the skill and the capacity of the NCR land owners.The idea was simply premised on the prospect that the idle land can be developed, with an uncertain material economic benefits to the NCR land owners, which is now proven to be so marginal, to have any game-changer impact on the lives of rural people while at the same time, the scheme rob them of any remaining opportunity to be modern farmers – since their lands have been surrendered lock-stock-and-barrel, and for meagre returns. Clearly, the development model was formulated, less for the development and welfare of the NCR land owners in mind, than it is for the economic opportunity made available from cheap NCR land.Was it a deliberate policy to cheat NCR land owners, or a policy formulation mistake – or both,the readers be the judge.

    2.The NCR landowners who had participated, without demanding a land title be issued first, but trusting the perintah/government will provide them the land title later,in my opinion – has been ill-advised or duped into the agreement, on so many levels. First, there is the silly mistake of projecting trust, without legal certainty – for the next 60 years of the JV deal. For all we know,the government can change during those times – and any policy reversal through legislative agenda – such as those that have been used to amend the Sarawak State Land Code, may nullify any promise of a land title to their NCR. In fact, if the landowners had been sold the idea of the JV on account of getting the land title in the first place,then they should have questioned why can’t they be issued the land title as a precondition for a JV deal ? Second, the government on its part – could have built into the model, that the JV company will be responsible to survey and issue land title to NCR land owners, to make sure the land owners – being 30% equity partner, will still have recourse to influence and drive the JV towards commercial success.To put the responsibility on the managing agent,to run the JV – but who is not close to the ground – is a bad decision. Again, is this a policy mistake, bad government or both – readers be the judge.

    3. The presumed and fixed value of RM1200 per hectare, to calculate the equity is intriguing. Not that incidentally, the planning figure for the cost of developing each hectare of NCR land is RM12,000. So the equity was established on gross planning estimate, instead of any fine-tuned parameters, according to the site-specific features. Of the RM 12,000 – the plantation companies always claim the biggest chunk of the cost is road building. But isn’t it curious, that no transparent public tender, with detail scope description such as the number and length of roads, bridges – to be builts as part of the JV, was ever used with which to secure maximum commercial value from the JV ? And that there is no account of the timber value to be extracted from the land to offset the development cost ?. Again, policy mistakes, bad government – or both ?

    The risk value to the NCR land owners participating in the JVs will increase (in asset value and probability) as the years go by, and the real lost is probably yet to come.For so long as the land owners do not get land title to the land under the JV, the risk is ever present – that greed will find innovative and unsuspecting ways to steal that land from them. Hence, whatever the land development model that will be formulated in the future, it had to be conceived and demonstrably better than in the past, and most importantly – the NCR land owners must have been bestowed with the land title as a minimum precondition to enter into any JV.And until there is a new development model,I will be incline to believe gkm2020 post. What rational explanation can there be ?

  70. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 8:10 pm

    Kitai mensia patut bisi tanah, bempu ka tanah. Enti nadai, ila kitai parai nyau tikau ke ai ga bangkai, nadai tanah alai numbakka iya. Enti kitai nadai tanah, kitai tau dikumbai urang PATI – Pendatang Asing Tanpa Izin. Sida PATI nya dini bisi mai tanah ari menua asal sida iya ke menua tu leboh ke ngampar, pindah randah ari menua luar negeri. Enti kitai tu nyau nadai tanah, we are equivalent to PATI ga. Therefore, anang enggai berambun ke sepot deka ngeringka tanah. Ngah hawong ba tebing pen bisi tanah alai iya duduk dedunguk, bisi tanah alai ngiga sida indu utai.

    Enti iban, dayak nadai tanah, reti nya, sida iya lebih jai agi pendiau ari hawong ga. Kemansangka tanah enggau manah ke ulih meri penguntung ke besai, au. Diatu urang ka nipu ngena jalai chara ke alus, enda berasai kena subok, sepi nyau udah ga tama perangkap sida ke bamak nya.

  71. Reserved Player on March 8th, 2010 8:20 pm

    Hello Mr. John Toilet,

    Just simply lodge your police report if you dare then. This is a challenge for you, simply just walk in into the nearest police station and fill the report. As easy as that, just do not waste your effort here.

    The view of this article and it’s title does not conflict any interest of the point of discussion. It is for us to judge and made our conclusive comment or whatsoever.

  72. Merakat anak Piun on March 8th, 2010 8:45 pm

    MT,,,well said.

    There was once SALCRA wanting to open the land scheme in our area and I asked these two question.

    (i) Do we have an independent audit representing the NCR land owner? The answer was a BIG NO.
    (ii) Since the NCR land owners are share holders of the land scheme, do we have the right to reject any cost from being charged the development and operation of the scheme? For example, if the producion fail far below target due to the fault of SALCRA management,who bear such losses, SALCRA alone or both? The answer was “BOTH”.

    I told the officer, this is rediculous. Why should land owner pay for SALCRA’s fault.
    Fortunately, we decided not to accept the scheme and till today have land for ourselves.

    That’s why DB called it “SKIM “MUNOH” RAYAT” change we must and Can….satu. dua, tiga …Hoooo….Haaaa

  73. Merakat anak Piun on March 8th, 2010 9:04 pm

    Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 7:01 am

    “How about the MalayNow in Mukah. Mukah is fast developing cioz our beloved CM stand nearby the town. I am sure there are many MalayNow who are owning the land near the Mukah Town”

    I don’t believe you are so dummy for not knowing the difference. If those land are properly titled under those owners’ names, then they can be mllionaire by the development of their lands. Like our dayak friend in Semarahan. all their land were properly titled.
    Hey Kaban Akiq Hawong…..ASK YOUR “SMART” brain, do our NCR land ower have the official title for their land??????????

    If you don’t see the difference, than you must be very vey drunk by the langkau provided free by Dayak lama or John Jamban

    Nya aja kaban,,,Akiq Hawong

  74. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 9:25 pm

    Igat Merakat Piun,

    Do you mean that the MalayNow lands in Mukah do not have proper titles?

  75. Cr. Lukau on March 8th, 2010 9:26 pm

    Hi Dayak brothers,

    Do not quarrel, but you can argue. If all of you are in one political party, I think some of you may leave the party, thus it can be seen as `internal crisis`.

    Long string of comments. One person posted about 5 to 10 comments, some are constructive ideas, some are threatening and some are personals.

    Whatever it is, we must behave ourselves. Be cool.

  76. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 9:30 pm

    Amat pama jaku Igat Merakat ak Piun nya ngelaban akiq neh igat Cr Lukau? Nyau sibuk ga kita ka bgator laya kami tu lagi. Tang aku sigi nadai danjong ka jai jaku enggau sida uchu sida igat aku nya. Dulu aku tu makai gaham ari sida nya.

  77. Akiq Hawong on March 8th, 2010 9:32 pm

    Huh! Anang deka pepaloi ga nuan igat Merakat ak Piun deka nanya aku munyi tu “Hey Kaban Akiq Hawong…..ASK YOUR “SMART” brain, do our NCR land ower have the official title for their land??????????”

    Nuan ga nemu utai ke benama NCR nya. So, ask your foolish brain!!!

  78. julaw on March 8th, 2010 9:35 pm

    dayaklama,pensioner,J.Jamban&T.Kumang.

    Magazine dayak, nama penanggul dah Chak,baru ka siti-dua magazine dayak ka dibantai nyadi penanggul besai ba kita? Magazine melayu, magazine cina, magazine ribai, ratus iti, ribu iti ba kedai, nama enda nyadi penanggul ba kita dah Chak?

    Enti baka nya kita meh ngadu ke kitai iban dayak magazine Chak, enggai ke kitai ngempu menoa tang nadai tanda.Udah 47 taun enggau bala kepayang, enti nitih ke udah besegaring magazine iban dayak ba kaki 5 cina Chak,nama kebuah? Kita ke pandai Chak laban bisi macha, kitai dayak iban bakani ka pandai, siti pan nadai magazine iban Chak!!!!@#$%

    Uji tanya di’ ngagai aya di’ jaboo Chak, ni cherita Nendak suba, nemu nuan Chak? Sapa muai Nendak, kini kita muai ia Chak, aku semina bisi meda disimpan ba U.Malaya Chak, Chak!!! Sayau meh Cherita Nendak nya Chak,laban semua penemu pengidup kitai iban dia magang.

    dayaklama, bah kita ke enda berajar tunsang, adu ke meh kitai iban dayak Chak, kasih ke maioh nadai pengawa, maioh merinsa, maioh kereja kontrak nyadi indon,maioh rari ke Johor, agi ratus ribu ke diau ba rumah panjai nganti kita ke nemu ngadu ke Chak.

    Telaga Kumang, nadai milih bansa migai. Nyamai nuan Chak nadai milih orang migai, jelu migai nuan ka nuan Chak, enda patut orsng ke pintar baka kita ka dipigai jelu. Anang bula Chak, enti kita enda milih, nyau enda kita tesat ba DB ditu.

    Mupok dulu Chak, anang enda ingat Chak kita ke migai diatu adu ke meh bansa kitai, kasih ke.

    Idup Iban Idup Dayak. Ooooohhhaaaa….

  79. Merakat anak Piun on March 8th, 2010 9:53 pm

    Akiq Hawong….
    I don’t understand what you want to know..maybe you are too “clever” by saying that NCR land owner can be rich if their land is developed…..yes Akiq Hawong…you have smart brain and I have a foolish brain.

  80. dayaklama on March 8th, 2010 9:58 pm

    Incredible Merakat Piun, graduated from the condong universiti. Among all the JV papers drawn by DB’s so far this is the most unacceptable one.

    Q1-Auditors are not free and what they want to see just your papers compilation and pointed your mistake and not in any way help to expand your business. So not neccessary might as well get the money and buy racun rumput for the ladang.

    Q2-For this luckily you not received a good punch from the developer. Who in the world will agree with you when the company that you both share making lost, you will blame your partner and ask him alone to bear the cost. When the company making profits you are the first going to withdraw the money from the bank and divide the money 50/50.

  81. Cr. Lukau on March 9th, 2010 6:28 am

    Hi Dayak brothers,

    THE LORD BE WITH YOU AND GO IN PEACE OF CHRIST.

  82. Cikgu Iban on March 9th, 2010 6:29 am

    DBs,

    In Sarawak, the govetnment officially recognise 1.2m out of a total landsize 12.3m hectares of land as NCR.

    When the government requires the NCR land for development, the official standard price of compensation is RM300.00 per hectare.This is the market price agreed by the government,

    Hypothetically speaking, if one is to acquire all of the NCR lands in Sarawak, he needs to work out the following:-

    1,200,000 hectare X RM300.00

    = RM360,000,000.00 or (RM360M)

    Now compare this figure with the total accumulated wealth of the CM family,the Tiong family from Sibu and many others. What can the Ibans conclude?.

    1. Many private individuals could easily make the nation Sarawak as a personal property

    2. The NCR landowners, esp the Ibans whereby major acquisation is taking place,are gravely hard done by the government.

    3. For you to think about..

    For DBs, this unfair rate of compensation is one of the policies befitting the so-called PERINTAH MUNOH RAKYAT policy adopted by the government and YDK.

    Cheers…

  83. Manang Empangau on March 9th, 2010 7:06 am

    Kaban Merakat Piun,

    I guess that there was a bit of miscommunication on the statement. That’s not a question of whose brain is smart or foolish.

    I am aware that just owning a NCR land only, one can still be a hard core person but if one develops it wisely, one could be a millionaire in a matter of time. If one’s NCR land has obtained a title, there is no gaurantee that one can be a millionaire instantly. Even if it is in Kuching town area, it would take sometimes for one to become a millionaire. If such land in the interior has a title, there is a prawn behind a stone motive to making it a valuable land.

    Let us be specific to the Mukah issue that had made us bumped into each other so hard lately about the MalayNow lands near the Mukah town. Are their lands having any proper titles and not mere NCR? If their lands have proper titles, there would be many MalayNows who were once having low incomes and now are millionaires and no longer planting sago, fishermen, selling ulat si-ot, jual umai, jual rokok apong, in due respect to the MalayNow. But Taib is good and he has always wanted the MalayNow to be the superior race in Sarawak. I mean, Mukah town is expanding; any NCR lands that have been given titles would be very valuable like those owned by the iban in the Kota Samarahan township.

  84. Manang Empangau on March 9th, 2010 7:07 am

    Sorry Merakat, Manang is also kokgo bali akiq hawong too.

  85. Akiq Hawong on March 9th, 2010 7:09 am

    Correction:

    …………I am aware that just owning a NCR land only, one can still be a hard core POOR person but if one develops it wisely, one could be a millionaire in a matter of time. If one’s NCR land has obtained a title,………

    Akiq Hawong

  86. Ugly msian on March 9th, 2010 8:02 am

    dayaklama,
    Suba bisi lagu diberi nama ‘Cap Kelapa Condong’ neh? Kitai mensia sigi amat ka condong ngagai kiba kanan.Enti ke kanan enggai nyadi, lapa enggai ke kiri? Udah 47 dayaklama enggau YDK ngulu bansa Dayak, nama nadai pemansang besai udah ulih Dayak? Enti sema Dayak maju ( on par with Malaynow/Malay )tau meh aku nyunting dacin maya SE ilak, tang pelaba aku,as of now, aku sigi nyunting penyakal.

    I believe that knowing who you are,perseverance and hope inspires one to greater height. dayaklama, you can’t take away that hope from me, can you?

  87. Akiq Hawong on March 9th, 2010 8:40 am

    Hi Cikgu,

    “For DBs, this unfair rate of compensation is one of the policies befitting the so-called PERINTAH MUNOH RAKYAT policy adopted by the government and YDK.”

    Patut sida aki YDK nya, Hentap, ngelaban perintah menya. Nya ku gaya utai ke nyadi nya. Patutlah sida Aya unggal Tiab, Rosli Dobi nya ngachok Dunkan enggau pisu. Bah! Kini enda meh pisu nya diatu? Kati bisi ba muzium kini?

    Nama diatu nyau sida perintah ga dituduh kitai ngelaban rayat deh? Enti sida perintah nya ngena ilang, pisu, bisi ari ga rusuk rayat nyau belubang, pala kena pumpong. Tang diatu, pen nya meh kena ngelaban rayat deh. Pama amat rega pen sida YB kitai nya. Aku enda meh tebeli ke pen ke baka enggi sida nya. Aku semina mampu ngena pen BIC aja wai.

  88. engkerawai on March 9th, 2010 9:45 am

    “Munoh” …literally means deprivetion, oppression, discrimination and unjust…

    What are the right formula to counter-act these munoh rakyat policy by the greedy and self-centred politicians?????

  89. Ugly msian on March 9th, 2010 10:34 am

    test?Pehintah munoh rakyat!

  90. Iban Abroad on March 9th, 2010 10:45 am

    John Jamban on March 7th, 2010 10:00 pm

    Tabi GMKbodo,

    I agree with some my friend bloggers here, your words are too harsh, accussing the govt land scheme formulated to munoh dayak.

    I hope one day you will summoned by ISA like other HINDRAF member. Are you look one of them.

    Don’t worry once you out from the detention camp you will be popular like other opposition party member, MP Jayakumay.
    …………………………………………

    Tu jako ketuai bansa kitai ke kelalu takut. Orang bejako bejurai ka utai ke manah kena mansang ka bansa kitai empu sida sibuk enggau pengawa ke deka nangkap bansa diri ke ngering ka hak bansa diri.

    Tang enti bansa bukai ngerubuh rumah bansa Iban, muai hak Dayak ba dewan, nganu Iban besembayang ngena jako Allah Taala, muai bup Ensera Iban, ngambi tanah asal Dayak siko nadai meh sida nemu bejako jauh deka ngerepot ngagai polis, ngasuh orang Bukit Aman ngena kuasa ISA nangkap orang ke bakatu.

    Kati tu ukai Perintah Munuh Dayak? Kati tu ukai ketuai munuh Dayak?

    Dayaklama, JJ, JJM Telaga Kumang, MJC, Changgop, Arah, Dino enggau bala Dayaklama ke bukai berunding meh panjai.

    Enti kita enda oleh nambah ka hak kitai baka enggi Melayu di Malaya abis kurang meh kita ngetan ke hak kitai Dayak ke udah digaris ka Jugah dalam 18 Perkara enggau ba perlembagaan sebedau kitai masuk Malaysia.

    Enti kita takut bejako ketegal lenyau pangkat, lenyau kuasa, lenyau bisness enggau lenyau gaji sekurang-kurang nya kita diau diri enda ibuh bemunyi ari kita ke ngelaban bansa diri ke deka ngeringka hak kitai Dayak.

    Enti kita ketuai bansa Dayak empu deka ngelaban orang ke ngetan ka hak kitai Dayak, bansa bukai enda ibuh sebut kitai agi.

    Enti kita ketuai bansa Dayak empu deka muai hak bansa kitai empu bansa bukai anang ngira agi.

    Enti kita ketuai bansa Dayak empu enggai ngetan bejako ka hak kitai Dayak bansa bukai jauh agi.

    Bah dini endor pengawa kita ke nyadi ketuai kitai Dayak? Kena nama kuasa kita ke diberi orang rumah panjai ngagai kita? Nama kena kita nyukong bansa bukai munuh bansa Dayak empu?

    Siko nadai meh kita ketuai nemu serta berani nyakal utai ke salah ke ngerusak bansa kitai.

    Orang nyungkur 60 pintu rumah Iban pan kita enda bemunyi rauh-rauh ngumbai pengawa nya betul.

    Purih sapa, uchu sapa, anak sapa meh kita bangat ngenakut nakut nya? Dini meh menoa kita bangat ngenakut nya?

    Bakani meh asai pengidup pendiau kita idup besehari-ari bangat kelalu takut bejako nyakal pengawa orang ke salah ngagai bansa diri ba menoa diri?

    Munyi ko jako tuai, nyau anchur didalam aku meda penakut bala kita ke nyadi ketuai ba BN tak lingu-lingu mending, meda, ngemata ka bansa bukai nyayat bansa kitai ke idup jengap-jengap enggau kuasa politik sida belubah-lubah ?

  91. Panjai Runding Panjai Ruai on March 9th, 2010 10:59 am

    Akiq Hawong & Manang Empangau;

    Bah Akiq seduai Manang udah bisi meda bala jaguh PEMULA TERJUN ba LUBUK TEDONG di Engkilili dia seduai?

    Akiq tau ga nganti ba tebing dia tang enda ibuh munyi enggai ka bala ti ka terjun enda jadi enti nemu bala hawong ngemata magang.

  92. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 9th, 2010 11:10 am

    Hmmmmmm…..nyau duduk bakadungok ga sida hawong nya ngemata ke sida ke bakategi ba tebing dia.

  93. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 9th, 2010 11:17 am

    Apo…nama nya nyau ngaga reti ke diri empu ga nuan term ‘munoh’ nya deh Igat Engkerawai.

    Ba aku, nama disebut munoh sigi dasoh mati, pumpong pala, nadai sepot meh nya, baka ke ngelam kutu sampai mati, enda pia?

    To counter-act these munoh rakyat policy by the greedy and self-centred politicians, we must set a new law that protect the rayat. Whoever practise the policy must be put to hukum bunoh ga.

    Nya iya bulih, Uchu.

  94. Panjai Runding Panjai Ruai on March 9th, 2010 11:37 am

    Kemata ka dia meh Akiq, engka bisi meda bala sida Igat Hayong,sida Allau bisi udah merati ka tebing dia neh .!!!

  95. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 9th, 2010 11:44 am

    Wat Iban Abroad,

    Apooo…nyau baka ke dempa pansoh meh bansa iban nya ba sida igat Dayaklama, JJ, JJM Telaga Kumang, MJC, Changgop, Arah, Dino enggau bala Dayaklama ke bukai nya neh! Nya meh daya kitai bansa….Anang ngelaban perintah.

    Akai…berani agi sida Hindraf ari kitai neh! Berani agi sida igat Arah ke nunu gerija nya ari kitai ke purih aki mumpong pala menya kelia. Nama kitai iban nyau udah ngelepot pala pot meh pala pehir nya diatu deh? Suba, ukai main pegari berita sida niang aki mumpong pala, nerumpak sida ba tasik din laban ke ka ngulih ke tajau guchi singa raja ari menua china nyin.

    Enti bakanya ku penemu sida igat Dayaklama, JJ, JJM Telaga Kumang, MJC, Changgop, Arah, Dino enggau bala Dayaklama ke bukai, manah agi pungka anak lelaki kitai iban diatu ngena kain kangan. Badu agi ngena sirat, gagong mansang ngayau. Ngayau meh ngena kain kangan awak ke sida munsoh saru ngumbai nya urang indu alu sida munsoh pen lemah semangat alu deka nelanjaika sida iya.

    Nadai meh daya…asoh ngena kain kangan sekali meh sida igat nya, uchu.

  96. engkerawai on March 9th, 2010 11:47 am

    Aki@manang,
    Jako ‘Munoh’ to kelalu kejam ga bunyi ia, baka ka ngambi nyawa orang. Nadai salah tang kitai deka interpret reti ia kebendar nitih ka context/isu ti dipejurai dalam forum tu.
    Besai penyalah ti kitai nyebut jaku munoh tu aki.

    Setakat tu bedau bisi law ke ulih condemned ukom bunoh ngagai bala penyamun ke negerompak tanah.
    Nitih ke ukom bala orang mongols kelia ulih meh aki!!!

  97. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 9th, 2010 12:05 pm

    Au…baka ke diatu, ukom bunoh tu sigi dituju ke agai sida ke nyeludup dadah enggau sida ke munoh urang enggau kempang enda beradat. Law ke ulih condemned ukom bunoh ngagai bala penyamun ke ngerompak tanah sigi enda ditempa laban ke diatu nyau sida iya ke megai perintah ga ke betanggungjawap. Dini sida ka nempa undang ke baka nya.

    Nadai petara Allah ka ngasoh kitai mensia ngukum bunoh urang, no matter how besalah they are. Tang rindu ga ati enti sida ke munoh rayat nya diukom bunoh, enda pia?

  98. MERAMAT TAJAK on March 9th, 2010 12:21 pm

    DB Readers,

    NCR Land issue has multiple dimensions But the central issue is Land Title

    Many of your post seems to misunderstand why this is so. Lets look at the “common misconception”:-

    (1) If you can plant lada, pepper, kelapa sawit etc on the NCR land, why bother about the land title ?

    a. The law put the onus on the NCR land owner to proof that the land is his and not State Land, by the amendment in 1996.

    So it means, the land can be alienated anytime by both public and private institutions – who would have massive resource.

    Prolonged court hearings, and legal service would be beyond the means of many NCR land owners. So without individual land title, the NCR land would be very expensive to defend – and Dayaks will most certainly lost in the years to come.

    b. NCR land with individual land title will automatically fetch higher market value. The land appreciates in value not only because of point a but also because the asset can be transacted more easily,example as collatoral for bank loans.

    c. Without individual land title, the NCR land in a particular area, is treated by the law as belonging to the community. This contradicts Dayak way of life, which generally do not have community ownership of land like the Red Indians, and other natives.

    Thats why many times you will notice, that government agency (or their local sycophants) or private investors, would go after the approvals of the counselors,penghulus and tuai rumahs.

    I have heard individuals who had claimed 1000s of hectare of NCR land for themselves at the expense of the real individual owners who doesn’t have the means to fend for themselves.

    When the individual doesn’t have land title, it means the NCR land is left to the mercy of local native leaderships: some of whom, would gladly steal from their anembiak, and sell off their land – given half the chance.

    (2) Trust the government – that individual land title will be issued at the end of the 60 year lease.

    a. Government is not an individual person who can be showered with trust. The government is made up of people of all types – who have been known to be not beyond doing unscruplous acts for themselves.

    This is the common misconception of so many simple and all too trusting Dayak folks in the rural areas. In the modern world, there is no such thing as a gentleman trust. Even government agencies and ministries communicate and establish agreement with each other according to the law.

    Verbal agreement is never accepted. And neither should it be accepted as a land title, any piece of paper, short of the actual land title issue by the land and survey.

    b. In the first instance, remember that the NCR land development model – had assumed that the NCR land is owned by the community, and that – when the land is surveyed, the JV would leave it to the community to decide individual land boundary.

    Looking at the vast tracts of OP along the Miri-Sibu road, I wonder if;

    a) any of the NCR land owners has been given the land title and
    b) if its possible anymore to determine the individual boundary: the OP would have removed many original indicator of land boundary such as tapang, lebak, tinting, sungai, batu etc etc…

    c. In both SALCRA and LCDA agreements, the community would surrendered their NCR rights without being accorded the proper legal owner.

    I think it is a huge risk, that whoever in the family who would survive until the 60th year, will be working on thin ice, as regard his and her claim to the land – without the land title being referenced and included in the appendix of legal document that were used to form the JV company.

    Using the Malaysian national average of longevity, I doubt I would live long enough to see what happens to the JV deal in 60 years time starting from 2010. I will never allow my descendants to be exposed to the pain of trying to fight a mega rich company, for a piece of NCR land heritage (that once was!).

    (3) NCR land development would make the Dayaks rich … (sometimes during the 60 years tenure or thereafter)..

    a. My father use to quip a wise word from a Temenggong … that goes like this: “utai ke ngasuh senang lantang, sigi enggai orang magi enggau kitai” (no one would truly work to make you rich). Two things to be said about this wise words;

    1) time and time again, it seems the JV would fail to provide decent dividence..claiming high capital expenditure… that says it all
    2) if the plantation were to be so successful by the 60th year, would the parties who has the absolute power to grant the return of the land or to keep the land to themselves — be so philanthropic as to give the land back without putting up hurdles…

    b. NCR land development for OP has become the *only* rural development scheme, nothing else… besides the occasional MRP. It seems like every other government agencies in the rural have ceased to function. No more agriculture subsidy to smallholdings etc…

    So I believe, the Dayak leaders in BN, has allowed rural development need to be paid off by the sacrifice of NCR land owners themselves, instead of fighting for a multi-prong rural economic development policy.

    The unwritten intention, may not be so much as to enrich the Dayaks, but more to reduce government cost in rural economic development.

    If the same principles of cost-cutting in the interest of efficiency is applied across the board,then there would be no issue …but why do the fisherman of Trengganu get RM 500 per month …but no more fertilizer subsidy for rural Dayak farmers ?

    (4) Even without title, when the Perintah takes the NCR land for development purpose, they will compensate the landowners anyway …. so why worry, ah

    a. The untitle NCR land would be dirt cheap. So the price differential alone is not fair to the owner. Why should development be at the expense of NCR land owners ?

    Would the Chinese/Malays lower the cost of their titled land, just because the goverment is building a hospital in their city ?

    b. If its a substantial development, many time unscruplous people would claim the NCR land as their own… and deprive the true NCR owner of the compensation.

    These people are the poor and old, whose children might be working hard in sweat shops in West Malaysia … and cannot tend to their property at home. Again, unncecesary injustice would be suffered the poor and helpless.

    c. If the land has title, the NCR land owner has more authority to negotiate for fairer, true market price. Not all NCR land are the same. Some NCR land may be located near town, and accessible by road.

    If NCR land owners have land title, they will then be able to work with lawyers and quantitative surveying companies to assess and evaluate the market value of the property. This way, similar to point a) government development will need not be at the expense of the rakyat.

    (5) The Land and Survey department said they don’t have money to survey NCR land … so it has to be left that way …

    a. Nothing can be further from the truth. Dayak people will clear the land, if thats what it takes. In fact, some Dayak people will be able to afford their own surveyor. Nobody is asking Sudarsono for the money to survey their NCR land.

    The land and survey department can endorse community survey report, after its done according to establish procedure and international standard.

    b. NCR land owners can be provided alternative funding, to pay for any survey cost, e.g using land value as collatoral for a loan etc

    c. The right to land title, for NCR land – is a human rights issue (given the foregoing), and so it should be given urgent priority.

    If, as in the case of Tr Nor ak Nyawai, the government is willing to bulldoze peoples home, to protect the interest of big business, and to appeal the court cases, it must surely have enough budget anyway to embark on an NCR land survey throughout the state.

    NOTES: These lists of misconception should suffice for now.

    Hope the post had provided additional insights to our understanding – Why NCR must be issued individual Land Title?

  99. Pengajar Udah Pencen on March 9th, 2010 1:36 pm

    MT

    Thanks for your comprehensive comments about our NCR land issues.We at least all know that a TITLED NCR land is of utmost important to our community.

    The L&S Dept. it seems is not at all committed to have our NCR surveyed and given titles.That could be because the BOSS does not want our community to ownership of our our own heritage.He might want us to be beggars and remain forever impoverished,so always be at the mercy of the rich.

    Even our YB Willy O’Badak had said not too long ago that it would be unwise to have our lands surveyed and be given titles.Quite IGNORANT he was
    or may be just to please the BOSS.

    Unless we change the BOSS and his present political system,the Dayaks are in for a LOSE, LOSE situation.

    So DB,all is not lost yet this why WE NEED CHANGE.

  100. Robanian on March 9th, 2010 3:17 pm

    Readers,

    The non issuence of land title must also be seen from a positive pospective. The minutes the land is titled, the first thing the NCR landowner would do is to look for prosptive buyers.

    In Ulu Roban more than 37% of the land developed by SALCRA has changed ownership….in 10 years times perhaps all the land there would be owned by the capitalist Ah Seng or Wong. A point to ponder!!!!

  101. benny on March 9th, 2010 3:19 pm

    Dear gkm2020,

    It nice to see you doing something positive to help/create awareness for your race to see the BIGGER picture….keep up the good work & may God bless you & your loved ones..

    p/s: spot the different;

    In Sarawak if the NCL taken for development, the owners live a miserable life.

    In West M’sia if the malay land taken for development, the owners become instant millionaire overnite..

    cheers!

  102. Pengajar Udah Pencen on March 9th, 2010 3:42 pm

    Robanian;

    You think like Willie O’Badak.If an owner should sell his land that is his RIGHT,but at least he got some money in return instead of getting nothing when his land is grabbed by some irresponsible TOWKAYS.

    However,not all landowners will sell their plots, even in Roban 63% did not as you said.

  103. seliong ak wau on March 9th, 2010 3:50 pm

    NAMA rega TANAH kita Unggal?

    Ku urang nadai rega tanah kitai. Enti nadai rega, nama kebuah deka belaya ke tanah deh? Aki ini kitai kelia nyau beperang deka ngenan ke tanah. Enti nadai rega, lebu mih sida iya mati ngenan ke tanah.

    Ah..nya cherita lama. Tu chrita baru. Kin tua nemuai asuh rumah Apai Sawai. “Oooi… Apai Sawai, bisi dirumah nuan?”

    Bini iya nyaut. “Bisi tang meri manuk sabung makai. Tama mih, duduk, lama enda meda,” ku bini Apai Sawai. Enda lama duduk baru Apai Sawai datai ari ujung bilik. “Ndai… lapa enda madah deka datai,” ku iya. “Ni Geduk tu tadi? Lapa enda diberi tuak?” Bini iya nyaut ari bilik…”Au…benung ngauk tuak mih tu.”

    Read more for non-political view on the value of Iban land, read in: http://www.1dayak.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=275

  104. MERAMAT TAJAK on March 9th, 2010 5:09 pm

    PUP,Robanian,

    On the surface, there is merit to the argument that Dayak will sell-off. But its just on the surface.

    Actually, if you dig deeper – its a non-issue.
    And I’ll try to explain it as follow, let me hear what you think about it:

    1. This is an old issue. The Malays in West Malaysia had the same social challenge when the city limits were rapidly expanded outward to Malay kampongs and small towns.There were fiery speeches made about Malays selling their land on the cheap to speculators.But the government did not freeze the issuance of land title as a cheap solution.Instead, efforts were made to explain the importance of land.The land owners were educated on the modus operandi of land speculators.They would be educated on alternative ways of using the land title to fund whatever they want to embark on. And instead of selling the land, they can rent it out, for light industrial devt such as workshops etc, and they themselves would be invited to jointly develop their land – for all kinds small businesses.In the Iskandar Development Region, the Johor Selatan local government would work with the Malay land owners to screen prospective buyers from rich Singapore.There would be so many different commercial model that would be made available to the land owners and the buyers, that in the end – both parties would be in a win-win deal. With the right touch, and will – by a good government, genuinely willing to help, not only to protect the NCR land owners from speculators and brokers, but willing to develop the area in a pre-planned and strategic way, there is no risk of the NCR land owners would lose all their land, once land title is issued.

    2. When we talk about NCR issue, we also talk about the land where many Dayak have built their longhouses, laid their dead to rest, and plant crops and fruit trees. No one should be foolish enough to think that Dayak people would sell of these patches of land. But by denying these types of NCR land from being issued land title, the social problem that would surely arise later – is only being postphoned.

    3.The most important counter-argument is this: what is the difference between surrendering the NCR land to SALCRA/LCDA for 60 years, and selling it off today ? I fail to see any difference. From a strictly economic point of view, money on hand is better than future earnings, especially in commodity. The risk of depleting value multiplied each year. One DayakBaru blogger, who called himself Pala Tekura, had sold off some of his land, so he could have just a mere RM 20,000 to develop 32 hectare of his land for oil palm (RM 4000 for the seeds at RM1.80 each and RM 16,000 for the excavators). He said, he now earned some RM 9,000 after expense.The moral of the story is that its better for the government to educate the Dayak about land development,and how to sell and buy – than to pretend to protect them (and got JV deal on the cheap), and refuse to grant land title.

    I would also strongly recommend to visit 1Dayak for Economics 101. Seliong should have many other ideas about how Dayak can be issued land title, and prosper by developing it – starting from ZERO, without having to surrender it to SALCRA/LCDA – as some Dayak BN leaders – may let people to believe, as the only viable option.

    p/s: I have no ambition to be a millionaire farmer but would be very happy at the prospect of more high rise buildings in Sarawak be named by Dayak-sounding name …besides Tun Jugah.

  105. Akiq Hawong on March 9th, 2010 5:13 pm

    Title tanah sigi amat berega laban sida perompak pedis mimit ka ngerompak, semadi meh sida enchuhi tauka nyengkuban pala tanah ba alam lachi alu memalsukannya enti sida perompak bisi kaki ba L & S. Anang ngenjau ke pala tanah, uchu.

    Ka agi aku nyau sijil digeri aku ari ke nyau pala tanah. Nyau pen sijil digeri aku, agi meh aku gawa perintah sampai pencen. Nyau pala tanah, bisi ari ga tanah nya dempu urang tauka tusah mandang ke bukti tanah nya enggi aku empu.

    Naka ulih menh kitai minta pala tanah; ibun memanah meh pala tanah. Anang nyagak iya laban ka gadai ba sida Ahlong.

    Ukai nya nyenyamai sida niang aki bulih tanah nya. Sida berambun ke sepot mungkal menua, kena kayau anak, kena serang hendap sida ke asal dia.

    Pala tanah nya meh bank duit, uchu.

  106. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 9th, 2010 5:22 pm

    Bah! Nyau kini kati meh sida Dayaklama, JJ, JJM Telaga Kumang, MJC, Changgop, Arah, Dino enggau bala Dayaklama ke bukai nya neh, nyau nadai nunga tudah akiq Unsoi berandau ba batu bedilang tu. Kada enda nampok sida nya ngiga penemu kena ngelaban Akiq Manang Empangau ke suah munoh jelu ke nyadi antu buyu neh. Kada enda nyau udah ambis binjin kena sida ngidup ke api ditu deh. Kati agi bisi batu api ba alam api pemantik sida nya?

  107. Pengajar Udah Pencen on March 9th, 2010 6:05 pm

    As I have said i agree with you 100%.I am all for our NCR lands to be surveyed and given individual titles.A titled piece of land will always fetch a better price than the non titled ones.

    If there should be plans for new townships or RGCs our community would tend to gain from their lands. Whether they develop the land for any purpose that would depend on planning by the governing authority and the sites of the lands.

    Since only VERY few Dayaks who can develop their lots either single handed or under JV it would be
    a pride indeed if there could be a sky scrapper
    with a DAYAK name inscribed on it.I could vividly remember that it was a pride of the people in Batu Niah that there is a building named PENGHULU KABU.

    For all we know Penghulu Kabu and his anakbiaks had moved from Engkilili to Niah area in the 1940s & 1950s.

    So, I see more reasons why our NCR lands should be surveyed and issued with individual titles.

  108. Merakat anak Piun on March 9th, 2010 7:08 pm

    Benny…..I agree with your comment.

    The sad part is Dayak Lama and the goons may never go beyond the shore of Sarawak or pretend …so they don’t know or pretend.

    thanks for your support on DB’s stuggles.

  109. Pengajar Udah Pencen on March 9th, 2010 7:34 pm

    Benny;

    Please try to give regular feed backs from Malaya
    so that some of us who are quite ignorant regarding the ‘special treatment’ received by those Malayans that we in Sarawak are deprived of.

    Highlight especially those aspects why we Dayaks feel that we are being marginalized.Tell everybody and those goons who are suffering from the chronic DENIAL SYNDROME.TQ.

  110. Cr. Lukau on March 9th, 2010 8:23 pm

    Hi Dayak brothers,

    Live as servants of God; honour all men; love the brotherhood.

  111. Uchu Lemambang on March 9th, 2010 8:34 pm

    gkm2020, amat betul tai ko nuan Universiti diatu endang amat condong ka bansa melayu. Dayaklama nya udah abis penemu kena nilat burit BN nya alai ia nya kelanjur jako madah u condong.

    Terus ka laban kitai bala ukoi, bala udok ke makai tai ditu. Kami meruan nyukong kita DB. Anang irau.

    Sida JJ enggau kaban dayaklama ni enda sebarang utai sebut ditu laban nemu sida nadai penatai pemisi agi ila enti BN tumbang.

    Terus ka pengawa kita ke bejurai ka penemu ke pemadu manah dalam era polotik 2010 tu.
    Nadai maioh rampang mensia enggau rampang iban ba blog tu ke selalu ngachau kita dayak biak dayakbaru pengundi baru tu

    NYA IYA …. JAGA KITA BARISAN. KITA JOHN JAMBAN

    IDUP IBAN BARU

  112. Kuli SALCRA ULU ROBAN. on March 9th, 2010 9:08 pm

    Robanian on March 9th, 2010 3:17 pm

    Readers,

    The non issuence of land title must also be seen from a positive prospective. The minutes the land is titled, the first thing the NCR landowner would do is to look for prosptive buyers.

    In Ulu Roban more than 37% of the land developed by SALCRA has changed ownership….in 10 years times perhaps all the land there would be owned by the capitalist Ah Seng or Wong. A point to ponder
    ………………………………………….

    Dear Robanian,

    I had overheard a conversation that the sale of titled NCR land in your area is the work of a retired government servant. He brokered the land deals with some Ah Seng, Wongs and others for some quick financial gains.

    Having said that there could be some small number of individuals who were so desperate for immediate financial returns by taking the easy way ie selling off their plots.

    Otherwise, some of these titled land would have remained in their safe hands.So let’s be positive about it.

  113. kbn on March 9th, 2010 9:12 pm

    Quote: In Meradong each family was given not 10 acres of rubber trees planted and 2 acres empty land for other cultivation such padi and vegetable. Beside that, a comfortable wooden house with electricity and watersupply were provided also.

    Most the land Scheme B are already transferred from SLDB to the people after 30 years period. This is good development program. The current price for an acre of land in Scheme B Meradong is 60k, which means most the Iban there is already half millionaire by land asset valvue. They are not as poor as you think. Unqoute

    Aku besai ba Meradong Scheme B. Enti nuan madah rega tanah nyak 600K diatu, ari ni nuan bulih rega tu?

    Aku tu ampit ngau urang nakal getah diak. Bisi gak bala tebayar ke loan agai LKTS tang enda terbayar aku pelaba. Enti nuan nemu skim tu amat mulai ke penguntong, padah meh brapa iko urang/settler ulih ambis mayar loan sida?

    Sida ke enda tebayar ke loan, nama nyadi tanah getah sida? Dinga aku ambis ditanam ke urang (ti enda dikelala) sawit.

    Rumah kayu bisi api ngau eletrik? Ai paip amat bisi tang elektrik nadai, mina rumah kayu staf bisi karan alu dicat.

    Diatu rumah2 kayu nyak udah nadai agi, diganti bala ngau rumah2 panjai. Aku bisi ngelimpas menoa Skim B Meradong maya Gawai 2009. What a sad story. The scheme is supposed to uplift their standard of living but not so.

    Semina amaya rega getah tinggi bala diak bulih duit. Tang enti madah ke bala nyak half-millionaire, sori la kawan. Pls don’t put it in such a way!

    You all are welcome to see the effects of this scheme B Meradong. I don’t know about the other two coz I have not been there.

  114. Merakat anak Piun on March 9th, 2010 9:23 pm

    ? dayaklama on March 8th, 2010 9:58 pm
    “Incredible Merakat Piun, graduated from the condong universiti. Among all the JV papers drawn by DB’s so far this is the most unacceptable one.

    Q1-Auditors are not free ……… buy racun rumput for the ladang.
    Q2-For this luckily you not received a good punch from the developer. …… to withdraw the money from the bank and divide the money 50/50”

    Your comment shows that your have an intelligence lower than a pig brain because even a pig will not allow you to take what belong to him. You may be a Harvard Graduate.

    I do not want to debate with you the purpose of the independence audit on behalf of landowners and also why land owners should not paid for the cost of mistake committed by the JV operator(SALCRA).
    Enough to tell you that in many successful international JV corporation, that I know of, partners are not responsible for the cost due to the mistakes committed by the JV operator. That’s why there is always an independence audit on behalf of non operating partners to identify those costs which the JV operator may purposely charge to the JV accounts that ultimately affect profit margin.
    Dayaklama, I have to admit that I am not even a graduate from chondong university. I am a graduate of Sekolah Attap, My primary school teachers did not even complete his Primary 5 education (If that’s happening now as enforced by Malaya’s Education rule, I might not be able to participate in this blog now. Lucky it was a British rule). I am not saying that education is not important but education alone does NOT make onea as an intellegent and wise person. Look at Ting Peck King and also your generous friend, Sung Swee Hua, whom your pensioner friend always get donation from every month, Both of them don’t even go to the condong university. Another good example, is Bill Gates, he didn’t even go to Condong university when he became famous for his computer wizard. Who are you and all your goons as compared to them?
    Ok Mr Harvard Graduate, share with us ,What is the “RECOVERABLE COSTS and NON-RECOVERABLE COSTS”? Why is it so many successful international JV corporations make that as one of their most common and basic business practice???? Are these JV corporations are so stupid because not all their employees are Harvard graduates like DayakLama, JJ, DEO, Telega Kumang, etc????
    Are the NCR Land owners the JV partners?????

    Share your professional answer Mr Harvard Graduate…..DL

    For DB, change we must and Can….satu. dua, tiga …Hoooo….Haaaa

  115. Akiq Hawong@M.Empangau on March 9th, 2010 9:41 pm

    One must remember that the scheme B is quite close to Sarikei and Bintangor, so their lands if titled are quite valuable.

    Why not think about making title for the land in Ulu Balleh, the Bkt Tibang area so that the folks there would be as rich as the iban in Scheme B.

  116. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 9th, 2010 9:44 pm

    Nama unggal Cr Lukau nya nyau munyi Pastor tauka Padri deh?

  117. anakuli on March 9th, 2010 9:46 pm

    dayaklama, anderson melintang,telaga kumang
    changop, MJC dah gerai nuan?
    john jamban agi makai babi nuan?
    pensioner.

    UJI PADAH NGAGAI AKU BA DINI KITAI SARAWAK
    KE BISI MASOK JVC (LADANG SAWIT) KE BISI
    PENATAI ENDA KURANG ARI $1000 SEBULAN ARI
    SHARE SIDA ENGGAU TOWKEY LADANG?

    2)BERAPA BELAH DAH TANAH KITA KE MASOK JVC?

    ANANG BEJAKO NGAPA TANG BUKTIKAN!

  118. Raja Merom on March 9th, 2010 10:02 pm

    Kunsila Lukau tu agi belajar nyadi katikis aya manang. Manah bisi katikis ba blog tu kena ngerara bala bakih ke udu amat bechakah runding. Puji tuhan.

  119. anakuli on March 9th, 2010 10:04 pm

    GROUP DAYAKLAMA SEMINA NEMU BULA
    BEDAU LAMA NYABONG BALA DAYAK BARU
    BELAYAK.
    TEMU DAYAK BARU CARA TAI KITA
    DAHNYA MJC TEMU DAYAK BARU GA MAIOH
    NAMA MJC@DEO@DINO@IBAN JOHOR!

    BAKA NI KAMI KA PECAYA KE KITA DEH?
    KILANG PEMULA.
    UKAI KILANG SAWIT KITA TANG KILANG
    BOT BANGGAR BARISAN NIPU!!!!!

  120. anakuli on March 9th, 2010 10:14 pm

    ANDERSON MELINTANG
    UJI SAUT NUAN KOMEN kbn on march 2010 9.12pm

    BISI MUNYI KE PADAH NUAN ON YOUR COMMENT
    7th MARCH 2010 8.12PM?
    NUAN SEMINA NYEBUT UTAI KE NADAI DALAM
    DUNYA TU

  121. dayaklama on March 9th, 2010 10:58 pm

    Hai, Merakat Piun glad to have you back in this endless and fruitless discussions. With current pace of development by the BN in next 10 years all high buildings will spread to the NCR land. It’s good that the developer is not interested to have JV your NCR as you have clearly stated the ” win-lost” deal to him.

    PM Najib had assured that 95% of Sarawak will be connected with treated water supply and good roads just on time we reach the developed nation status. The Gomen target is right on track.
    We don’t care about that right,what is most important our NCR land value must be high. Those who own large piece of NCR will be rich by then.

    The problem here is we have reached the climax of development and coming to the edges. The 5 dams construction was completed, construction of new huge and high buildings is ceasing. We the Dayaks who have money at this time is still nothing compared to those chinese towkay who own the high rise buildings sitting on the NCR land. Whatever it is we still cannot reverse the history.

    Before it’s too late don’t distance yourself from the gomen. Vote for development mean vote BN.

    Salam 1Malaysia.

  122. anthonyselat on March 10th, 2010 4:45 am

    ngumba ndar ga perintah ngai nda dipasuk ba SKIM/JV ga tanah kitai kena nanam pun sabun udah 60taun baru deka meri surat(hak milik)tanah…nama ngai meri ntik kitai empu nanamka diri…tak baik ka bepuluh guni leka sabun alu taburka…ka ia mesai ni tanah ulih meh tanam diri empu enda ibuh beJV amatmeh bulih surat hak milik tanah..anang2 ATUR BN TO DEKA NGULIHKA KAYU BA TANAH KITAI LABAN NYAU BEREGA RAMU DIATO ALU NYADIKA PUKOK SIDA IA..BALA NEMBIAK KITAI ASUH SIDA IA NYEMALAU BELAH MENGERI NGULIHKA GAJI BEKULI BELAH KEDAI KOPI RM10 SARI.. CDA IA NGIGA/NGAGA PENGAYA BELAH KEBUN AKI KITAI..ENTI TUDAH NEMBIAK KITAI BANSA NGEREJA UTAI NDA MANAH BAIKNYA NYEMPIT..ENCURI TAUKA NYADI KERUK..ALU DI PEJAI’ KUMBAI SAMPAH MASYARAKAT TANG BISI BALA TUAI KITAI BANSA NGERUNDING PEMEDIH BANSA KITAI DIATAS JARI BANSA ORANG DATAI.. KITAI ASAL NYADI ULUN amat meh begaji tang enda setipak engau pemedis KALAKA BALA YB..YC KITAI IBAN BEJAKOKA PASAR GAJI BALA KITAI BANSA KETEBAL GI BEKERJA GAJI ARI..IAKA DIASUH DIAU DI LUS PEKERJA TIK NDA D SIKAP NGAU KEREBAN API NGAU RUMAH PEMIRA TIK NYENGENDA..ENTI NITIH KITAKA BESEMAK NGAU PERINTAHNYA MEH ULIH BEJAKOKA SEMUA PEKARANYA LABAN JAKO KITA BISA NDA KALA NYAKAR SEKIM PERINTAH..ANANG TAK NEMU NGIAR KA KITAI BANSA LARI ARI ULU SUNGAI/MENUA PESISIR ALU DIASOH NGIGA PENGIDUP D NEGERI NGAI KA ENDA AMPIT PEMANSANG PERINTAH KOKJAKO UKAI SALAH PERINTAH ENTI KITAI BANSA MAJAK DIAU ULU SUNGAI nya belik diri empu ko jako bala sekeda ba blog to..

    ..SKIM MUNUH RAYAT….
    -anang guai nyagam penyamai bansa kitai pengudah 60taun laban bansa bukai nda nganti 60taun meda penguntung
    -ntik perintah ngai disalah rayat anang ngaga undang2 ba keresa rakyat awak ka rayat ngaga undang2 kediri empu enti rayat nda mujur baru tau ngumbai rayat jugau..ngelusuk..belik..
    -anang ngumbai iban nda nemu bedagang ntik perintah empai ngaga kedai ungkup iban ba endur ke maioh orang baka ba pengkalan seperis,pengkalan bilun,tembung orang gawa..anang ngagaka iban ndur bejuar ba teluk utai laban iban baru bedagang..
    -anang ngumbai iban nda tetanam ke pun sabun bedanndang besai ntik perintah empai ngaga undang2 iban ulih bekuasa penuh ba utai tumbuh ba tanah diri empu…
    -anang bejai bala nembiak iban ngereja pengawa nda manah entik perintah empai ulih ngaga tikas gaji ka patut baka perintah meri alaun idup susahka bala perintah ke bekereja dulu sungai laban orangka kerja kotrekka sigi amat susah
    MINTA AMPUN BISI KELUAR ARI TOPIK…

  123. engkerawai on March 10th, 2010 5:37 am

    MT,
    You elaborate in length about the land issue, credits for that. I presumed that you must be very well informed of the facts about NCR land exploitation in Sarawak based on wht you have written in this forum.

    You must be a successful dayak enterprenur in plantation sector. Dont hesitate to educate our fellow Dayaks on land issue, they really need our help to salvage the NCR land from being taken by the outsiders invading our territory.

    The Tun Jugah foundation and the DCCI should play its prominent role to generate the economy of the dayaks.

    I also fear that our Dayak enterprenur will also falls victim to the greedy BN politicians. The rich become richer, the poor become poorer..

    So..every dayakbaru protagonist in this blog should remind and educate our own people on the importance of protecting our motherland.

    I would not submit…the Red warriors will defend its rights at whatever cost it takes!!!

  124. Kuli SALCRA ULU ROBAN. on March 10th, 2010 6:36 am

    Anderson Melintang,

    The posting by kbn on March 9th, 2010 9:12 pm has revealed to us the truth in the real world. It confirms our views that schemes have nbeen really effective means to assist the folks.On the ground, the reality is harsh. Most of the earlier schemes established by the govt on NCR lands designed to raise up the living standard of the Ibans ,have failed to achieve their intended objectives.

    If the shemes are a success, then we would not have heard or met young children coming from those three schemes looking for some contract jobs in town. When the pasture is greener at their own backyard, certainly the young will not be tempted to go outside looking for better jobs. They would be staying put enjoying life with better income courtesy of the schemes. Bt sadly, this is not to be….

    Cheers…

  125. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 10th, 2010 7:14 am

    Menua Skim B ba Meradong nya semak pasar Sarikei enggau Bintangor, nya alai, sebarang tanah bisi diberi title sigi berega amat.

    Uji ga kitai minta tanah ba menua ulu Baleh, Ulu Kanowit ke jauh ari pasar bisi title! Enti ka meda tanah dia berega, tau ga ngaga pasar baru dia nyadi baka ba Pulau Batam. Nya baru iya….laku bot ekspres ke Kapit.

    Baka ba Lanjak Entimau, sida mayas ke nguan menua nya angka ngibun tanah ke nadai pala ga laban ke selalu agi sida nya diau ba puchuk kayu. Semadi meh kayu dia nyau ambis kena balak, kena ladang sawit, padi bukit.

  126. John Jamban on March 10th, 2010 8:18 am

    Hello Kaban Bloggers,

    It is crystal clear the DB group is confusing themselves with the land development scheme in Swk. Or that the DB group are negative to all land development.

    But if the land lying ideal and infested with forest, and bring no cash to dayak; will it help dayak?

    Since independence 1963, firstly we Iban Chief Minister, Ningkan, followed by Tawi Seli, and then we have the Melanau regime.

    During the Iban CM regime, Ningkan developed a land scheme joint venture with SLDB with the contract lease of 30 years. The people will provided with land title like in Meradong, Lambir and Melugu.

    But now the land development is changed. The big corporation from West Msia only joint venture with the NCR owner when contract of 60 years period agreed. Otherwise there is no deal brother!!!!. Hope DB Group Plantation come for the deal which never comes….

    Honestly during CM Stephen Kalong is much better because it was shorter period of lease contract. Beside that the land is marketable once the land title was released. BUT THEN MOST DB GROUP DO NOT AGREE TO IBAN CM DONE IN THE PAST……

    BUT NOW DB ….. WHERE IS DB VERSION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT….PLEASE JUST LIST YOUR PROPOSAL HERE. IT IS EASY TO CRITIZE RATHER THAN IMPLEMENT.

    Nya aja kaban.

  127. John Jamban on March 10th, 2010 9:40 am

    Hello Kaban Bloggers,

    I am pleased to announce that a member of DL ad hoc committee Kerani Opis Welfare were among the 364 who received thier loyalty award from YDK.We were made to understand The Loyalty Service Award was given in recognition of his active role in countering and neutralising DB false propaganda in this blog.

    Nya aja kaban.

  128. engkerawai on March 10th, 2010 10:14 am

    Jamban@Agu,

    We have to produce our master plan for the future of our generations. Although we don’t have the means and authority, but the votes will decide who will win favour from the rakyats.

    If the opposing DB civilization is in power , we should be able to come up with a Blueprint to protect the lands of the Bumiputras’ in Sarawak.

    Jamban you should be with us as protagonist in this forum, not with pandatang/invaders of Dayak lands.

    Don’t be the Talibaruts creating havoc towards our own people….learn a hard lesson AGGU!!!

  129. Student university BN Chundong on March 10th, 2010 10:22 am

    We students are reading this topics.Initially we do not know what is right / wrong, who is right / wrong.

    Thank you all – esp Dayaklama team for really NOT showing that the government has progress the Dayak.

    The Dayakbaru contributors are presenting “facts” and “info” that the BN cannot deny, except issuing threats of ISA, deviating to Dayak magazine.

    We student can see the hopelessness of BN in solving Dayak issue.

    We will tell our parents and siblings to vote opposition. Dayaklama failed to argue his case in this topic.

    We studied in University “chundong” – chundong laban BN make it that way.Ka ngagai University “lurus” di menoa tasik, our parents are too poor – maybe because 47 years of BN rule did not bring economics progress to our parents.

    That is facts – we are poor therefor we studied in University Chundong – the creation of BN Ketuanan Melayu

  130. engkerawai on March 10th, 2010 10:41 am

    Student U,
    Amat jako nuan nya…we are fighting a loosing battle but, we will not retreat even an inch from our struggle as DB >>>>>

    The facts/truth are very clear, our conscience is real and not just an imagination.

    We look forward to a brighter side of life and the continuity of Dayak race in Sarawak.

    PM najib knew it very well and they really need to pamper the Sarawakian with the “Fixed-Deposit approach” to win the sympathy votes from us.

    In Malaya BN is getting weaker, their attention will be on Sarawak and Sabah.

    The RED WARRIORS are capitalising on this issue!!!

    A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILE BEGINS WITH A SINGLE STEP>>>>>>…

  131. Iban Abroad on March 10th, 2010 11:02 am

    John Jamban on March 10th, 2010 8:18 am Hello Kaban Bloggers,

    It is crystal clear the DB group is confusing themselves with the land development scheme in Swk. Or that the DB group are negative to all land development.

    …………………………………………

    Ditu, aku rindu agi ngena jako Iban awak ka orang rumah panjai bisi nemu utai dikerandau ka kitai ditu. Laban taget randau kitai pasal penyarut tanah NCR Dayak tu nadai lebih ari orang rumah panjai.

    1. Sejengkal Tanah Rizab Melayu nadai tau dikachau bansa bukai ngena chara meli, sewa tauka ngaga projek ngena nama kompani ke ukai Melayu. Enggai dikumbai mensia maioh bula, berita ke silik agi pasal jual-beli tanah rizab Melayu tau dipeda kitai maioh ba web site. http://www.mudah.com. Enti BN nadai bisi agenda ke jai deka ngerumpak tanah NCR Dayak nadai kebuah BN enda tau ngopi undang-undang orang Malaya ke bakanya. Agi ga kitai udah dibai Najib 1 Malaysia.

    2. Sejengkal nadai meh tanah rizab Melayu di Malaya enda udah disukat lalu diberi surat pala tanah. Enti enda diberi ngagai individu tanah nya diberi ngagai pemakai menoa baka rizab tanah Melayu Bukit Selidang.

    3. Udah 47 tahun kitai udah merdeka, asil kampung enggau minyak pan udah ga maioh, nadai kebuah BN enda oleh nitih ka pengawa Rizab Melayu Malaya nyukat tanah NCR Dayak enti BN enda sengaja ngemula ka rakyat madah ka tanah NCR Dayak enda oleh disukat ketegal nadai chukup belanja. Agi ga tanah di dunya tu oleh disukat ngena stalite dalam komputer enggau cara ke betul, canggih mudah serta murah.

    4. Enti tanah NCR Dayak enda oleh disukat ngena cara individu, BN oleh nyukat ngena cara Pemakai Menoa rumah panjai siti-siti lalu beri surat pala tanah Pemakai Menoa nya. Iya ke bukai barang ko sida di rumah panjai nya empu ngariska diri bidang tanah diri empu tauka ngambi kediri land & survey nyukat tanah diri empu. Cara tu jauh lebih manah ari tanah ke nadai disukat diberi pala sekali.

    5. Udah tanah disukat bisi pala bakanya, baru BN tau bejalai ke rumah panjai berunding ngaga projek ke deka diaduka baka HEP, Ladang Kelapa Sawit enggau utai bukai.

    6. Enti projek dulu disebut tauka dulu dikerja tanah bedau disukat enggau bisi pala, tu jalai salah ngatur tanah NCR Dayak. Penemu nipu endang nyeruga ba mulut BN ke deka ngaga projek baka nya. Ati kepapas deka makai Dayak bisnis ngiga untung kediri mai scheme kelapa sawit munuh bansa Dayak endang nyeruga ba pala bala BN.

    7. Ditu kitai becontoh ke tekat Wong Irup, Wong Belaga enggau maioh ladang kelapa sawit ke bukai. Keterubah ladang kelapa sawit ke digaga cara tu di Sarawak iyanya ba Skem Kelapa Sawit Merindon, Lubok Antu ke ditumbuh ka dalam tahun 1975. Enda ibuh aku bejako panjai, kita empu tau nanya orang Merindon pasal garis tanah sida enggau penguntung dia.

    8. Enti menoa diri empu enda ga oleh disukat BN nama agi utai oleh dikerja BN. Jauh deka ngemaju ka menoa baka menoa bukai. Ngutun reta diri empu baka nyukat tanah deh enda oleh. Nyau kelalu beli perintah BN enti bakanya.

    9. Ari nya jako BN ke ngumbai DB charut penemu ba tanah tauka nyakal projek tanah NCR Dayak jauh sekali salah. Utai ke dipinta DB iyanya, sukat dulu tanah NCR Dayak, beri pala surat tanah ngagai individu tauka surat tanah pemakai menoa ngagai rumah panjai sebedau projek dipejalaika.

    10. BN patut bado agi melit penemu orang rumah panjai laban jako bebelit bisi mai ati insidan ngeransi takut ke untung diri nadai maioh ari projek tanah orang rumah panjai.

    Ngemansang ka tanah NCR Dayak awak ke mai asil ke menyana ke rumah panjai bepun ari rambai jako: “BN sukat meh tanah NCR Dayak dulu ngena cara individu tauka pemakai menoa lalu beri pala tanah nya sebedau tanah dikerja perintah.”

  132. Iban Abroad on March 10th, 2010 11:10 am

    John Jamban on March 10th, 2010 9:40 am Hello Kaban Bloggers,

    I am pleased to announce that a member of DL ad hoc committee Kerani Opis Welfare were among the 364 who received thier loyalty award from YDK.We were made to understand The Loyalty Service Award was given in recognition of his active role in countering and neutralising DB false propaganda in this blog.

    Nya aja kaban.
    …………………………………..

    Ditu BN madah. Sapa bansa Dayak ke nanah ke BN Sarawak ke betuai ka Taib ke beempuka Politik Munuh Dayak ukai semina diberi pangkat, gaji enggau bisness tang mega deka diberi gelaran ari Taib.

  133. anakuli on March 10th, 2010 1:21 pm

    john jamban agi makai babi nuan?

    SAPA KITAI DAYAK KE DULU NGELABAN DAYAK
    LALU MUAI KALONG NINKAN?
    JABU KAN???

  134. tuai on March 10th, 2010 3:58 pm

    I say we give this gkm2020 fella a chance to represent us in the dun. I think he is better than Masing and George Chan.

    It will be a waste to see his ideas just binded by this website and not put into good use and practise in the govt administration.

  135. benny on March 10th, 2010 4:49 pm

    guys..

    most houses in Sarawak, the biggest state in MALAYsia which developed by developer is 60years leasehold…in west MALAYsia mostly 99years if not FREEHOLD even in concrete jungle suke as BUKIT BINTANG, Mont Kiara etc…better still in Penang & Selangor whereby after the PR take over most of the land lease converted to FREEHOLD…

    how much automatic discount bumiputra in Sarawak entitle if they were to purchase house or shop?

    in west MALAYsia is 7% of the selling price….

    1MALAYsia my FOOT!!!!!

    cheers!

  136. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 10th, 2010 5:47 pm

    Enti bala DB ke lama gawa nya enda nerima long service, reti nya nyau ukai 1Malaysia meh nya, enda pia? Tauka nadai urang recommend sida nya laban ke bisi ati kepapas awakka sida ke ngelaban DB ga ke bulih award nya kadiri nenggali.

  137. kbn on March 10th, 2010 5:50 pm

    Anderson Melintang

    How many millionaires produced from Meradong Scheme B?

    What happen to those settlers and their lands who cannot pay all their loan?

  138. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 10th, 2010 6:03 pm

    Enti ba skim B dia udah mayuh millionaire, kitai tentu ulih meda sida dia enda ngirup ai kopi-0, ai nyilu kuku, ai paip ba sebelah pasar Sarikei/Bintangor, tang nyau bepudu, mandi ngena ai rimau, kemi apek ga.

    Peda aku pun getah dia nyau udah tuai dia enda ditangkal laban mar ditangkal, pun bebungkong, nyau ambis rimpat mata pat. Diatu, madang getah dia nyau rapit bulu babas, madang engkejuru semina alai sida pelandok belalai.

    Rega tanah dia pen mansang tinggi ga amat iya tak repa dipeda. Enti ngetan panjok, tentu bulih pelandok tampin, sida kijang balut dia.

    Kadang enda mayuh tengiling dia laban tengiling kena tangkap ba Sibu selalu dilepas ke dia. Duit dia nyau beranak belalai wai, ba alam babas.

    Untung amat ga sida ke enggau Skim B nya. Arap ke sida perintah numbohka mayuh agi sekim ke baka nya ba pelilih menua Sarawak, anang semina ka ngaga ba menua sida MalayNow aja.

  139. Akiq Hawong on March 10th, 2010 6:13 pm

    Oh Tuai,

    Nadai ga ngawa ke unggal gkm2020 nya mansut ke penemu ditu.

    Enti sida YB dalam DUN nya terpelajar, tentu bisi ga sida nyengok sekali sekala agai batu bedilang tu deka nangkis penemu sida ke ngelaban sida iya.

    Amat tak mayuh memanah meh penemu sida ditu, nyengkaum penemu sida.

    Penemu sida DB semina manah ba sida DB alu enggi sida DL and committee mega semina manah ke sida iya ga. Barang sapa ke sentara, tau ngaga ke diri ga, ke lain agi ari penemu DB and Dl.

    Aku sigi ka ngati ke diri, unggal.

  140. Manang Empangau on March 10th, 2010 7:35 pm

    Sapa sapa apai ke beduit, anang jugau enti bisi peluang tanah dijual. Beli meh tanah nya awak ke empu anak uchu ila. Tanah tu sigi enda kala nurun rega. Iya baka ai tuak, makin lama makin nyamai, tanah makin lama makin berega.

    Hmmmmmm… enti sida anak uchu iya nyual tanah nya ila…huh! gaga amat sida iya, nyau kaya sekelip mata amat meh apai nyau bendar ngulihka duit kena meli.

    Enti baka sida apek china menya, sida sanggup ngena baju sampang, betanchut tarit beselipar Jipon laban deka nyimpan duit. Sida iya pen parai alu enda enjoy duit ke ulih iya.

    Nama guna, nyau rugi ga idup enda makai duit ke ulih enggau titik peluh diri. Nyau lebu meh nya; bisi ari ga ka nesal. Sida anak uchu iya ga ke untung.

    Nama tuju ka idup baka nya enti nyau sanggop ka merinsa ketegal ke ka ngasoh anak uchu senang. Sepot ke ka didup tang nya ga ke ka diperinsa sanggop bejimat enggau belauk ikan masin aja tiap ari.

  141. anakuli on March 10th, 2010 7:43 pm

    JOHN JAMBAN AGI MAKAI BABI NUAN?

    APALAH BANGGA SANGAT KE LOYALTY AWARD NYA ENTI KETEGAL NILAT TUMBONG ORANG.

    ENTI BAKA AWARD WO I (RTD) KANANG ANAK LANGKAU BARU KITAI OLIH BANGGA LABAN MUNOH
    KOMUNIS.

    NADAI NGINING AKU CAK…

  142. William Sunny on March 10th, 2010 7:49 pm

    The people must be positive towards any development proposed by the govt. It’s planned for the good of the people. Every development is sure giving benifit to the people. We must support our CM. He is the most outstanding CM that we ever had. He has no replacement. He sacrifice his life even until he becomes a bachelaor again today. If I were him, I would no longer sleep alone.

  143. Akiq Hawong@M. Empangau on March 10th, 2010 8:57 pm

    Uchu ke disayau aku Student university BN Chundong,

    Arapka kita enda bulih tauka belajar ke penemu ke chundong meh ba U nya. Kada enda sebaka U ga Igat DL nya enggau kita deh?

  144. Cikgu Iban on March 10th, 2010 10:06 pm

    DBs,

    1.The people must be positive towards any development proposed by the govt.
    …………………………………………..

    Ideally, every race has a reason to be positive towards the development projects carried out by YDK. On the surface, nobody seems to be left out from reaping the benefits derived from them.

    Sadly, the Ibans seem to have been purportedly left out from all these projects. The intended benefits could easily be reaped by other races, in spite of being minorities, but not the Ibans. Eventhough they are in majority race in Sarawak, the state government crucial decisions have apparently been influenced by the majority Malays from Malaya. As a result, these planned benefits are rather elusive for most of the Ibans. This particularly true for the Ibans in the interior. When compared to the poeple in town areas, these Ibans are living in absolute backwardness.

    Therefore, while some people could be positive toward development projects, the same could not be true for the Ibans. Quite often, these projects are detrimental to life.

    2. It’s planned for the good of the people.
    …………………………………………..

    No doubt the government has properly planned the projects to benefit every single individual or race. The effectiveness of the implementation of these projects has often been questioned. For the last 47 years, the policies in determining the projects favour those who are closed to the state politicians. You stand to gain quite substantially by being cronies and proxies of some influential political figures.

    In short, while the planning is good, the execution of the planned development always benefit the sleceted few individuals.

    3.Every development is sure giving benifit to the people.
    …………………………………………..

    This is true but not without imperfection.As often the case in Sarawak, the benefits are always reaped by those supporting the absolute

    4.We must support our CM.
    …………………………………………..

    No. It is not compulsory to support him. No reasonably thinking Ibans would say the we must support him. NO way!

    Nya aja dulu, Cheers…

    p/s. Welcome Cikgu Dom. At least there is an another likeminded joining us.

  145. benny on March 12th, 2010 12:22 pm

    to me as non dayak…the best person to be cm of sarawak now is DS Idris Jala…he is not with any bn party at the moment, i hope PR can pull him in before ….

    cheers!

  146. julaw on March 12th, 2010 8:43 pm

    William Sunny.

    What are u talking about & where are u from William? We,Iban Dayak are still far behind, backward, from all aspect of even basic needs. We don’t see any developement, as far as Iban Dayak areas is concerned.

    William, do come and visit us in Krian area, L.Antu, rural Kanowit, ulu Rejang, rural Betong etc.

    Mupok dulu kaban. Idup Iban Idup Dayak. Oooohhhaaa…

  147. engkerawai on March 13th, 2010 6:28 am

    Who on earth is william sunny???
    Sudden emergence of new pro-mamut guy in DB>>>>>
    Another “Dogs of Mercy” which is quite ambitious.

    Bujang engkerawai will sense his move and prescribed him with my lethal sting!!!
    That should do the Job for the invader.

  148. Cikgu Iban on March 13th, 2010 6:45 am

    Unggal Engkerawai,

    This recalcitrant did appear once some time in Apri; or May 2009, coing with the same old tune, giving compliments to YDK.

    Is still can recall cornering him on several issues.

    Yes, no doubt about it. He is a typical DOG of MERCY for CM Taie mamut and YDK.

    For that ,please do give hem a good sting!

    Cheers…

  149. William Sunny on March 25th, 2010 8:53 am

    If one continues to oppose the govt, one will never get more good thing for oneself. One must never oppose those who rule. Remember our great grandfathers who had opposed the Rajah Brooke era. What had happened to our beloved patriotic warrior, Aki Rentap who is also the aki of YDK TS? His aki is reduceg to nothing. Thanks for his uchu who had built good Lumbong for his aki on top of Bukit Sadok or else his aki will never be remembered in a good way for his patritism fighting for the dayak. It looks unfortunate for his uchu who had decided to take side with the govt led by Uban a MalayNow. His uchu would not like to follow his aki rebellion against the govt, so, his uchu will side the uban by hook and by crook, be it like selfish or not defending the right of the Ibans.

    If you want to be rich like YDK TS, one must be a pro govt of the present. One will blessed for siding the govt. God has chosen the present govt to lead us well. Disrespecting the govt means one disrespects God.

    I an neither Uban’s man nor belongs to DG group!!!!

    I just want to give opinions for you to weigh a good life for yourself.

    Thanks

    W. Sunny

  150. William Sunny on March 25th, 2010 8:54 am

    Correction:

    …..I aM neither Uban’s man nor belongs to DB group!!!!…..

  151. dayaklama on March 25th, 2010 9:10 am

    Morning Good, Kaban Bloggers & Readers,

    Not DL say, but rather from the mouth of a horse.

    Pemandu CEO Dato Sri Idris Jala said during the DCCI AGM in Miri last weekend that:

    “Never in the history of the Malaysian government has so much fund has been allocated for Sabah & Sarawak toward rural infrastructural development esp. connecting longhouse and Kampong. The amount of fund has increased by more than 1,000 per cent”. A point to ponder.

    But DB being DB (anti-establishment and pro-PR) and being affected by the “Kemena fever” as usual will say it’s a bluff/lie.

    Salam 1Malaysia

  152. Student University BN Chundong on March 25th, 2010 9:58 am

    William Sunny – my understanding the BN government is giving the people “Project Munoh Rakyat”.

    Who cares whether you are BN or not. There is NO Opposition parties in this blog. We have many Dayak giving input into the “needs” of Dayak and how best we can get it.

    One option is to Change the Government by defeating them in the election process – the democratic way.We Dayak should not be made a “slave” to this government – to do what they like with us.

    47 years of this same government – we are not getting what we want, we change them.

    The government listen to the voters, not the other way round.

    By the way Jabu is not peturun Rentap, only his wife Empiang is a direct descendant of Rentap. Their marriage was opposed by many by his wife family.

  153. Dr. John Brian Anthony on March 25th, 2010 10:04 am

    Jugam – why do you pretend to be Dayaklama. Please do not do such a bad thing to Dayaklama.

    We want Dayaklama to discuss Dayak issues and development here.

    Jugam – you are misrepresenting Dayaklama.

    Is this the BN way – always living a lie?

  154. Dr. John Brian Anthony on March 25th, 2010 10:27 am

    These are the IPs of:

    Jugam: 203.82.94.82 / 203.82.92.70
    Dayaklama: 203.82.92.84 / 203.82.81.120
    John Jamban: 203.82.92.91
    kgb: 203.82.80.68

    Dayakbaru – what do you make of these IPs?

  155. gkm2020 on March 25th, 2010 11:23 am

    Unggal William Sunny,

    I refer to your comment: William Sunny on March 25th, 2010 8:53 am

    My Personal Opinion

    I guess you’re still lack of some issues that have burdened our Bansa Dayak todate.

    I see that you still cannot differentiate between the roles and functions of “Perintah and Politics” and/or “Perintah & Party” or “Perintah and Bad Policies” or “Perintah Rayat and Perintah BN”.

    No one here (particularly DB) is against the government But against “BARISAN NASIONAL” (BN).

    What DB want today, they want to replace BN with “Perintah Rayat” (PR) and reform all the BN’s self-interest/bad policies with PR’s policy for rakyat. Returning back the power to the rakyat not to ‘special privilege peoples” and their nepotism or cronyism government.

    DB roles is for the rakyat; to uphold, protect and defend “Native Rights” and other rakyat rights.

    Is it against GOD if we’re defending and/or protecting our “Native Rights” and/or the “Rakyat Rights”?

    Is it against GOD if we’re defending and/or protecting our citizenship rights/lives against ‘Evil Government” and/or “Satanic Government”?

    BN don’t own the Government But the rakyat do. How can there be a government if there’s No rakyat? Are you not a rakyat?

    It’s selfish to say that the rakyat are against the government if the government is part of the rakyat.

    What rakyat want is to replace and reform the current political party (BN conglomerate) and their ‘scammed policies” from managing the government of today.

    Now let me give you further example herein:

    It is the Government’s role to evaluate the issue of immigration through the lense of the people’s will, the lense of national security, and the lense of historical precedent, and economic stability (to name a few)…

    It is then necessary for the Government (specifically each member of congress individually) to determine what laws (if any) need to be passed/repealed to better regulate/de-regulate immigration activities in order to insure that the people’s will, national security, past immigration activity, economic stability, along with a host of other concerns are adequately accounted for.

    Propose new laws if necessary, vote on these proposed laws and allow them passed into law if agreed upon.

    Them the executive branch must enforce these laws, and the judicial branch must uphold these laws in their judgments.

    As for Non-Government Organizations like DB in which its members are also a registered members of Dayak NGO, really there only role is to abide by any such laws.

    One might argue that businesses who develop the NCR lands are not being responsible.

    However, so long as the business are not breaking the law in their code of practices and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), they are within their legal right to do business. The partnership must favor everyone in such venture.

    I would also argue that our current situation is a result of some ‘technical failures’ to act on the part of government organizations in order to insure the integrity of our economy and adequately address those concerns above, particularly as it relates to the enforcement of violations to our “Native Rights”.

    NOTES: As I can see the current (BN) government are pressuring these NGOs not to highlight the truth of their misdeed and mistrust; they tactically not helping these NGOs financially and also ‘blacklist’ some NGO activist from traveling abroad and so on. This is what DB fighting for; direct and/or indirectly ie helping our NGOs to put things onto the right path; God right path.

    EXODUS 23: Justice & Fairness

    “Do not spread false rumors, and do not help a guilty person by giving false testimony. Do not follow the majority when they do wrong or when they give testimony that perverts justice. Do not show partially to a poor person at his trial….”

    On the “Iban History”, please kindly read the web-link below and find out who-is-who had cheated and/or betrayed the Iban:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iban_history

    Conclusion

    Helping God peoples is not disrespecting God But helping wicked and evil people is disrespecting God!

    If you oppress poor people, you insult God who made them; but kindness shown to the poor is an act of worship.

    Pursuing Justice is helping God But pursuing and/or denying injustice is respecting God; yet helping “satanic government”

    Disrespecting God means failing to do God’s work.

    Cheers!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN…Hooo…Haaa…!!!

  156. Akiq Unsoi on March 25th, 2010 11:24 am

    Apo….nyau ngeramak amat meh jelu jugam nya uchu ka ngiga anak sida indu engkelulut enggau indu engkerawai. Nya baru ngam nyadi jugam.

    Anang pia jelu jugam. Legi kitai nyau disumpit alu empedu kena ambi disimpan dalam botol penuh ai wiski ga. Manah amat empedu nya kena ngubat sakit madai isi.

    Badu nuan ngereja pengawa ke jai baka nya uchu. You must not nyadi munsang mali nyadi kambin beri beri ditu. Anang nyaru ngena nama urang bukai. You can create names for yourself like kokgo bali but don’t become a sheep-clothing wolf anymore. Be professional. Enda ngawa dek nyadi kokgo bali laban ka mali hijau tauka chelum kelabu, but you are still a kokgo bali. But if you are a wolf, you must not put on your sheep-cloth to become a sheep. That’s an opportunist!!

    Nya aja uchu.

    Akiq Unsoi

  157. William Sunny on March 25th, 2010 11:37 am

    Yes, I agree with you, Igat gkm2020. The DB is against the BN only. But since the BN is the present govt chosen by the rayat, so they are the govt now and today.

    So, it looks like the DB members are against them as well. Unlike our legendary hero, Rentap, who went against the Brooke, I think we have to submit to our leader Uban and govt faithfully as well.

    We must respect the govt; we must respect the leader coz he is chosen by majority of people who believe in God or Allah.

    But if the DB succeeded to become the govt one day, yeah, likewise the rayat must also respect the DB govt too.

    We must respect the present govt coz it has the right to torture its’ opponents if it wants to. Loyalty of the rayat towards the ruler is ever pledged. During the Japanese Occupation, if one was not loyal, one’s head would be chopped with a samurai but not kena salai lah.

    Thanks

    W. Sunny

  158. gkm2020 on March 25th, 2010 12:10 pm

    Unggal William Sunny,

    I refer to your comment: William Sunny on March 25th, 2010 11:37 am

    Of course DB respect the Government BUT not “Barisan Nasional”.

    What DB struggle is to give back all the “Native Rights” to the rakyat now: “Perintah Rayat”?

    What happened to Rh. Nyawin and Rh. Nor Nyawai – bulldozism policy, Penan/Punan many issues, Orang Ulu Bakun many issues, over 201 native legal court cases and many other issues? Can you ask the government to give us the answer now?

    Notes: Polisi ngelam ka menua sigi salah ari sigi undang-undang; that’s BN Dammed (52x Dams) Policy! BN could also means “Barisan Ngelam”; barisan ngelam ka rayat.

    1 VOTE – 1 NATIVE LAND TITLE

    1 VOTE – 1 NATIVE COURT REFORM ACT & FULL COURT FUNCTION AND LEGITIMATE JURISDICTION

    1 VOTE – 1 NATIVE LAND ACT

    1 VOTE – 1 NATIVE ACT

    1 VOTE – 1 NATIVE LAND TRUST ACT

    1 VOTE – 1 NATIVE LAND SOVEREIGNTY ACT

    Now, I ask is it right to do ‘injustice’ and/or ‘torturing’ others to defend and protect their rights? Your comment refer below;

    “We must respect the present govt coz it has the right to torture its’ opponents if it wants to..”

    The word “torture” is a barbaric words and/or works. So if the government is enforcing barbaric policy then BN is barbaric manager. That’s also means BN is the promoter of “Japanese Imperial Government Policy” right?

    I feel very sad to see this BN governmental concept of managing this country. I forgive the government But let God judge BN conglomerates.

    Further reading on “torture”, please kindly refer to this weblink: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture

    Good government produce good policy and uphold Rule of Justice. Bad government produce ‘torture policy’ and uphold Rule of Corrupt Practice.

    Good government is civilized government that why we call it ‘civil government’ which is part of the civilian system and civilian is rakyat.

    ‘Torture Government’ promote ‘dictatorial-ship’ that produce ‘Axis of Evil’ just like the Japanese Imperial Government and the Nazi Germany in WW II.

    “Torture Government” is not patriotic but ‘misguided patriot’ that puts the rakyat and the ‘country’ before ‘humanity’ without ever understanding why BN over-zealous patriotism and BN anti-humanism does more harm than good for the security of Sarawak/Malaysia.

    Corrupt government mismanage tax-payers money. Now, who should we blame the government or Uban who lead the government? Who is to be accountable to tax-payers money; the government or the rakyat themselves? Remember, rakyat are tax-payers.

    Regardless of our national affiliations, we’re human beings before anything else. BN doesn’t seem to feel that way though. Governments should not possess instruments of coercion, ‘torture policy’ and violence denied to their citizens; this is a democratic country unless it’s ‘demoncratic’ country.

    DB believe in real democracy and not dictatorship. Democracy is a government where you can say what you think even if you don’t think.

    The current government, which was designed for the rakyat, has got into the hands of the bosses, elite groups, special privilege conglomerates and their cronies that produce their special interests.

    An “invisible empire” has been set up above the forms of democracy. Therefore it’s no longer a government But an “Private Empire”!

    Another meaning for “Private Empire” is privatization of government policy for their “Private Interest” less the rights of the people. Thus, democracy cease to exist.

    Let me quote you this;

    Abraham Lincoln’s test for moral casuistry: “If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong’…if waterboarding does not constitute torture, then there is no such thing as torture’…

    Therefore it is Not against God if DB voice the “Rights” of the people to the government. DB is patiently awaiting to replace BN from the government. The next government is “Perintah Rayat”!

    Fundamentally, government exists as a reflection of the will of “the people” or “the rakyat”; generally meaning it is an organization established by a majority of those seeking to be governed (to have rules & regulations established as the people need and to have the “government” administer those laws for the benefit of the people. Unfortunately this has evolved into government existing for itself and controlling the populace).

    Natural rights to life must needs be the focus of government. Otherwise, a contentious political quagmire of corporate/ego-centric/ethnocentrism reiterates Machiavelli, “Least happy is the (world) whose institutions are entirely off the path that leads to a right and perfect end. But the BN for which the Malaysia flag stands is not a done deal. It is the means of working towards a right and perfect end, to answer the prayer “Thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven”, to form a perfect government: a new paradigm politic.

    Lastly, what happen if leaders are not loyal to the rakyat would the rakyat ‘chop’ their heads? Of course NO; because rakyat will follow God “Rule of Justice” (the very basic of 10 commandments), people will forgive them but let God judge them. In addition there are already enough laws to do justice on wicked people. Its wrong to play ‘fire-with-fire’ because it’s the rule of evil doings.

    The Lord hates it when wicked people offer Him sacrifices, especially if they do it from evil motives such as ‘torture’. The Lord hates people who use dishonest scales and weights.

    Cheers!

    AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN…Hooo…Haaa….!!!

  159. William Sunny on March 25th, 2010 1:35 pm

    Unggal gkm2020,

    I have no objection if there is a need to change for a better. Whoever rules us is our govt. Well, many affected citizen need to work hard for a change or else Sulimanm a rojak son, will take the place of his father to rule us.

  160. William Sunny on March 25th, 2010 2:58 pm

    Unggal Julaw,

    I am talking about development, whether carried out by the govt or opposition. Since the BN is handling the govt at the present, so we must give undivided support for them to develop the iban/dayak area like in Ulu Krian, Julau, Kanowit , Betong, Ulu Rejang etc. Some areas may not be able developed coz of the rejection from the people who have the kind of opposing mentality. I guess, those areas that you have mentioned being as backward are areas where people have oppossition mentality. Opposing never bring us good development.

    W.S.

  161. dayak thinker on May 13th, 2010 12:53 pm

    Turn off the computer, and straight away go to Putrajaya to discuss this matter.

Leave a Reply




Bad Behavior has blocked 958 access attempts in the last 7 days.