JVC Model is contractual relationship
Taken from article by Assoc Prof Ramy Bulan
Dayakbaru:
Why did the government introduce a law : map making by the communities could be an offence when the government herself refuse to survey native land?
Don’t you think that the government is creating “bad law” to deprive the Dayak of their land heritage?
Change WE Must
LCDA is the native trustee and has clear fiduciary duty to protect the rights of natives
This means that, when native customary landowners surrender their rights to the LCDA as trustees, there is a clear fiduciary duty to protect the rights of the vulnerable right holders. A government agency that takes on the duties of a trustee under a commercial arrangement becomes a ‘trustees twice over’ (Finn 1992: 243), particularly where the vulnerable landowners depend on it to negotiate the best terms on their behalf (Lehane 1985: 98).
JVC model is contractual relationship
In the present JVC model, the relationship between the corporate developer and government agency (trustee) is contractual. Does a fiduciary relationship exist between them? It is suggested that the mutual confidence between the JVC and the LCDA (or its agents), in appropriate circumstances, does not exclude the possibility of a fiduciary relationship.
The Malaysian Federal Court has already held that the relationship between parties in a joint venture agreement is a fiduciary relationship. Thus, if a right is not sustainable in breach of contract, there may be an avenue in equity where there is a breach of the fiduciary obligation.
Breach of Trust and Remedies of Beneficiaries
What remedies are available to beneficiaries should there be any unauthorised act or in case of a breach?
At the core of the trust concept is also a right of the beneficiaries to make the trustees accountable to the trust and to ensure that they act within the terms of the trust deed. The remedy for the breach of a fiduciary duty includes declaration of rights or a claim in damages and compensation.
Beneficiaries have “policing” right
Beneficiaries have a right to have the trust property invested in a way that will keep a balance between them. They have a ‘policing’ right, to see the trust accounts from time to time, and to require the trustees to make good any breach of trust. While trustees are not bound to give reasons in exercising their discretion, the absence of reasons could create a presumptive case that a trustee’s discretion has been miscarried or was not exercised upon real, sound and genuine consideration. Beneficiaries may also apply for an injunction to restrain a fiduciary from acting in a way that is detrimental to the trust.
The issue takes on a different angle where the trustee is a government agency.
Section 29(1) and (2) of the Government Proceedings Ordinance 1956 debars an injunction being granted against a government or an officer of the state. An order for the preservation of property may be made if the plaintiff can show that irreparable damage not compensatable by damages would be caused. Despite the nomenclature, if the effect is the same as that of an injunction, it will not be granted. Thus, while it is open for claimants to take legal action to prove their claims, very few natives have the means to sustain such actions.
Questions of Proof and Reversion of Land
A fundamental aspect of the JVC is that native customary ‘owners’ become joint venture partners without having to provide financial capital. This means that ‘their equity in the joint ventures would be based on the area of their land; and the irresistible part of it all is that their land would be returned to them when the government has no more use for it’ (Jitab with Ritchie 1991: 66).
To what extent can the beneficiaries be assured of the reversion of the Native Customary Land? The issue is not that ‘the government will not cheat its own people’; rather, the problem lies in the discharging of the onerous burden of proof that is on the claimant.
Problems for successors after expiration of 60 years agreement
Since Native Customary Lands are not individually surveyed, there are latent uncertainties in terms of the specific shares in the land. At the expiration of 60 years, persons who have surrendered their rights may no longer be alive. This could cause problems for the successors unless they can work out a clear system of partition and inheritance of the land. If the native claimants are not able to settle their claims among themselves, there is a possibility and danger of them losing their rights to the legal owner who has a registered (master) title to the land.
The registration of NCR does not provide indefeasibility of title – it is just acknowledgement of a claim
The new Section 7A of the Land Code provides for registration of Native Customary Land but does not provide indefeasibility of title. In Fong’s words, it is treated merely as an acknowledgement of a claim to the land until the contrary is proved, a certification to a right, and not a ‘proprietary right in land’. The onus of proving an interest remains on a native claimant.The problem reverts to the question of the restrictive provisions under Section 5 and the clash between statute and native concepts of land.
Native have to proof that the land belong to them
The commonly deployed method of determining the existence of native customary rights over a parcel of land is aerial photographs taken prior to 1 January 1958. However, these may not be available, and the claimant then has to show alternative physical evidence of occupation before 1958, or else show records of permits, which are virtually non-existent.
Thus, upon amalgamation of all the contiguous lands by the Director of Lands and Surveys, land that is vested in the trustee becomes the legal property of the agency with no compensation paid to the claimant. With no payment of compensation at the point of amalgamation, is the amalgamation tantamount to summary taking of land without compensation?
We must survey the land before joining the JV scheme
One possible way to avoid this problem may be to survey the land and grant individual titles to the owners at the point of their joining the scheme. This would ensure that persons who join the scheme know their specific share and are able to stake a claim at the expiration of the 60-year provisional lease period. Before such a survey can be carried out, such rights must be fully investigated, demarcated and recorded before titles can be issued to replace the customary tenure (Goh 1969: 4).
It has been argued that a full-scale statewide registration of native interests over land would be a time-consuming, tedious and costly operation (Fong 2000). However, in specific projects such as this, the advantages of a proper survey being done prior to implementation cannot be understated.
It is imperative that the authorities take steps to survey the land for the natives.
A prior grant of title to claimants would best serve the interest of the vulnerable owners and the sense of security would be an incentive for participation. It would go a long way in improving the implementation of Native Customary Land development (Songan and Sindang 2000: 251). With the passing of the Land Surveyors Ordinance 2002, the combined effect of Sections 20 and 23 entail that a person who is not a licensed surveyor cannot make, authorise or sign any cadastral map. Since map making by the communities themselves could be an offence, it is imperative that the authorities take steps to survey the land for the natives.
Concluding Remarks
The caution in commercial joint ventures is that, all too often, when there is no more money in the venture, it is easy for parties to forget their contractual obligations and the vulnerable parties often suffer. As an active sponsor of these schemes, it is all the more pertinent for the government to provide some kind of a guarantee that Native Customary Land will revert to the owners at the end of the venture. Similarly, in the event that a JVC withdraws without completing its job, is there some form of a guarantee the native customary owners will be adequately compensated?
Arguably the government’s fiduciary obligation may be said to go beyond a mere commercial arrangement to become ‘trustees twice over’, based as it is on the customary owners’ trust and confidence in the government. Perhaps there is scope here for application of Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s (1995) caution ‘that equity principles must follow developments in commercial law for commercial expediency, but such application has to be both thoughtful and sensitive’. What has been developed as an instrument to defeat unconscionable conduct should not ironically become the very instrument that defeats the rights of those that it purports to protect
Popularity: 28% [?]
Related posts:
- Sarawak JVC land development is “facilitative commercial trust” Taken from article by Assoc Prof Ramy Bulan Dayakbaru: Please...
- The New Model: Joint Venture Companies Taken from article by: Assoc Prof Ramy Bulan Dayakbaru: Many...
- The TRUST as a device in Land Development in Sarawak Taken from Assoc Prof Ramy Bulan This is a continuation...
- ADAT PART II – UNDERSTAND OUR LEGAL USUFRUCT RIGHT Written by gkm2020 Updated: 15/2/2010 How are Dayaks related to...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Comments
50 Responses to “JVC Model is contractual relationship”
Leave a Reply
-
-
Total Hits
-
Inspirational word from gkm2020
DAYAK LAMA & RABAN IYA
DINI MENUA KITAI DAYAK KE BISI PENATAI
1000 SEBULAN UNTONG ARI JVC(LADANG SAWIT)
ANANG NYEBUT KEMIDAN SARATOK LABAN
PENATAI AKU ARI SARATOK.
PADAH ANANG ENDA MADAH
Tabi kaban blogger,
I always admired Ass. Prof Ramy Bulan for her good articles appeared during these few days in this blog. But a bit too academic , perhaps she never come back to her kampung in Bareo Swk after she got married during her second year law student UM in 1978.
Since Ramy Bulan article is appeared several times here it is timely to introduce who she is to my fellow blogger here.
As a student, she always a head girl in SMK Marudi and Tanjong Lobang.
Upon passed her HSC in 1977 she was offered to study Bachelor of Art in UM, though she always wanted to be a lawyer. Her HSC result was not that good enough to qualify her to get into the Law faculty. However, she appealed to UM registrar, and she got it when she reasoned that her community Kelabit needs a lawyer to link the people and the BN govt. But it surprises me that she had changed now, for the reason is best known to herself.
It is indeed pity since her marriage to the Baie in Semanjung, she settled there and forget her kampung people.
She should fly to Bareo now, to witness their people suffer during the prolonged dry season where the crops are withered to rot and the buffalo are hunger to death.
HER ARTICLE IS MEANINGLESS TO THE BAREO PEOPLE NOW BECAUSE CANNOT BE SQUEEZED TO PRODUCE WATER TO QUENCH THIRSTY POPULATION THERE.
Nya aja wai sulu.
Telaga Kumang-Deo-Dino=Arah,
We are equally surprised that you, as a P/S, are that ignorant to the way people in Sarawak have changed their thinking towards the policies of systematic grabbing of NCR lands. In fact, all right thinking Dayaks should have changed their mentality and perception to see the losses of NCR lands from their hands to the cronies of the politicians. Only those Dayak recalcitrants will continue to decide supporting the unfair policies of the government,claiming that they are quite fair to the Dayak Ibans. And you are in this category of people,Telaga Kumang.
There reason for her change is clear. And similarly, the reason for our fight is also clear.We jusr cannot become a link to the government when it endlessly keeps on exploiting, marginalising, victimising and sidelining the Dayak. The treatment of the Dayak was bad in the 1980, 1990s and getting worst in 2000s. Thus, it is hardly surprised to see that Dayaks, having used to be a link, now start to destroy this link. WHy must we uphold the policies which are hugely unfair to its own people?
Her articles are never meaningless to the Bario people. Only someone like you will say that they are useless as they are telling the truth about the state government land policies. And these truths hurt you. If the state government policies are fair, then why are there over 100 land dispute cases still pending against the state government?
On the other hand, it is your comments that are useless. You are here just for the sake of neutralising us.You come with your writing because you are paid to do this. It is your means of living.
We know that your comments are nothing other than being used to neutralise DB cooment which are factually correct. You just cannot afford to deny truths which are getting clearer and more difficult for you to deny by the day.
Regardless of what you people say, DBs still continue to do the simplest task in highlighting the unfair policies to the Dayaks and how the selected few cronies have accumulated incredible amount of wealth, courtesy of the Dayak people.
You should not be worried. We will fight till the Native rights are duly observed. Believe me, there is still hope for things are gonna change for the better one day.
Cheers…
Uchak Telaga Kumang,
Kemaya tua ulih mandi ba telaga nya?
Baka enggi endun Ramy nya, sigi ngadang iya enda ingat ke Bario laban kitai ga nemu. More than half of her life would be devoted to the Baie life.
Aku enda ga pechaya ke sida ba Bareo dia nadai sumber ai irup. Mayuh anak sungai dia tang bakani ku jalai ka nyambung agai rumah nya ke penusah iya. Ukai nya senang ka ngangkut paip ngena SkyVan. Siti trip ari Miri enda alah RM3,000. Ukai nya mayuh ulih angkut sekali.
Arap ke DS Idris berunding meh. Enti digaga ke jalai ke manah kin alu Bareo nya nyadi negeri, bisi ari ga iya nyau baka ba Pulau Batam. Mayuh sida ari sepiak kin ngiga pemakai baka sida endun ngiga pemakai ba P. Batam nya.
Kapa endun nya ka kiruh. Anak iya enggau Baie nya pen nadai nama Kelabit, nyau baie ga nama. Enti baka sida china ke lelaki, sigi nadai nama iban meh anak sida enti jadi enggau sida endu kitai nya. Kapa ka nyebut enggi endun, gamal iya pen nyau bajik agi, nadai belanggo agi deh.
Whether joint-ventures to develop their NCR land benefit the landowners or not? To find the truth, go and ask the landowners who have been taking parts in JV.
We should appreciate what Assoc.Prof RB is contributing here. Not in material forms but to the mind. Endu Telaga@Dino@Deo@Arah,aren’t you using technology to log on to this blog, with pictures, etc.One can use facebooks, emails, twitters and whatnots to communicate these days and sharing information. Do you really need to be in the place to know what is happening?
By the way, what has Bareo got to be proud of? Perhaps Bareo people should demand equal pricing policy for pricing for their basic amenities.
What Endu Telaga is doing is a personal attack, a low stoop!
That is a few steps too far, Telega Kumang.
You are very vindictive. To attack Ass. Prof Ramy personally without arguing the points presented speaks volume of your personality. In your world, no one can have an opinion other than yours. You are indeed a crystallisation of BN. PM Najib with his 1Malaysia should be very proud of you.
Even then the things you mention about the Associate Professor are wrong.
I am very disappointed with Telaga Kumang posting in response to a scholarly writing.
If Telaga Kumang is a representation of Dayak thinking and attitude in BN, Dayakbaru have enough reason to not associate ourselves with BN.
Telaga Kumang/MJC/JJ/DEO/Dayaklama:
Bala kita tu kepapas,jai runding,ngidup ka diri empu aja NADAI BERUNDING KA MENUA NADAI BERUNDING KA BANSA.
1.Nama kebuah kita enggai meda Ramy Bulan tu meri penemu ti tau muka mata bansa Dayak awak ke sida mereti enda ulih dikemeli,dikemula bala kita agi.
2.Nama kebuah kita madah Ramy tu ngelaban penemu BN? Kati kita madah orang ti bisi penemu ke ulih meri penerang ti betul tu salah ?
3.Anang kita bejai ka Ramy ketegal iya enda diau di Bario laban periok iya di Malaya din.Nama kita enda ngaga branch Campus di Marudi din enti enda rindu meda iya diau di KL deh ?
4.Bala DB semua rindu ke bala kitai Dayak ti pandai baka Ramy tu lalu ka bekunsi penemu enggau rakyat.
Bah terjun meh di Lubuk Tedong bala ti selalu
mansut ke PEMULA dalam blog tu.
Bala kaban DB;
Bakanya meh chunto PS YB Iban be banchat serta enggai ninga penemu org bukai…. maioh bala PS tu ke dikelala aku wai kaban….
nadai siko sida tu udah nyadi Prof tauka lutor baka JBA… sida semina bejako ni nangka penemu sida iya nya meh… siko PS suba sanggup ninggal ke pengawa nyadi AO ketegal ka nyadi PS YDK… diatu nadai meh iya ulih nyadi YB… anang ka nyadi YB, angka tak pincin matuk nyadi PS meh nuan nya unggal… AKU NGELALA NUAN NYA !!!!!!!
Telaga kumang,
There were times when we feel frustrated, angered at what happened to us Dayaks, as mentioned. Just like ‘kacang lupakan kulit’ What can DB do on this matter. Its against our will, our conscience, our destiny.
Maybe you should remind and teach her [Prof. Ramy] a lesson on patriotism…if you are qualified to do so. I think it should be alright with his marriage life…but, she might have to rethink for his position as Dayaks, where our people really need their help.
Anyway kumang ati….pulai meh wai ngibun menoa, megai menoa ngambi bala kitai di menoa enda tesat runding enggau pikir ketegal di tubai bala..prentah BN.
SULU MAKAI DI DALAM!!!
Aku agi ingat ga leboh kitai ke bekelikoh ke pasal nama petara kristin suba, aku balat endar argue enggau igat Arah. Kati Igat Arah sigi amat Telaga Kumang ke bendar. Hmmmmm…..enti iya iban tulin, hajin endar meh iya macha AlQuran. Mayuh amat ayat ditulis iya; pala aku nyau sebening macha ayat ke diberi iya nya. Alu pia meh, kati sida DEO, sida Dino nya bisi nyadi kokgo bali ga?
Igat PRPR,
Sebedau sida DEO, Dino, DL nya terejun ke lubok Tedong, bala sida jagu ke diau dia patut diburu dulu ga. Enda alah ga blog tu nyau sunyi nadai enggau kita betunu ke penemu ditu ila.
All,
I can understand why this article bugs Telaga Kumang so much that the messenger was attacked instead of the message. The message brings home 2 key truths (devastating to TK points of view) – that:-
1. There is serious risk that any untitled NCR land used as equity in a JV involving a government agency,will later require “onerous” (very difficult) procedure to revert ownership to the owner after 60 years. The legal derivation sounds complicated, but I think, it boils down to this aspect:
—————————————————————————————————-
…Section 7A of the Land Code provides for registration of Native Customary Land but does not provide indefeasibility of title. In Fong’s words, it is treated merely as an acknowledgement of a claim to the land until the contrary is proved, a certification to a right, and not a proprietary right in land’.
—————————————————————————————————-
To my mind, this mean 2 things:
A) The law interpret that Dayak who entered into a JV agreement, involving the government agency and private company,is only submitting claims of ownership to the NCR land — and the burden of proof to claim of ownership shall remain all the way until the expiry of the JV. Contrary to what some Dayak leaders have said, the land title is not guaranteed to be given to the NCR land owner -neither does participation in the JV provides any additional legal evidence for claims to ownership (on the contrary, many typical body of evidence of individual land boundary would be irreversible lost from the plantation activity …as Dr Bulan had intimated it as well)
B) If the readers have unfortunately surrender their NCR land for JV development, they should take steps to document the land boundary among the participant themselves, without waiting for the JV company to pay 3rd party surveyors (typically they can give all kinds of execuses). The document can be prepared as a sworn affidavit,to be witnessed by the present local native leaderships – TR,Penghulu, Pemancha.This is not the same as a land title, but to my mind – its better to have something to support the so-called JC Fong’s “claim to ownership”.
2. The status of the government agency as trustee in the JV also beg many unanswered questions and the discourse on it merely ended on a “hope” that
—————————————————————————————————-
…there is scope here for application of Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s (1995) caution ‘that equity principles must follow developments in commercial law for commercial expediency, but such application has to be both thoughtful and sensitive’. What has been developed as an instrument to defeat unconscionable conduct should not ironically become the very instrument that defeats the rights of those that it purports to protect
—————————————————————————————————-
This thought lead me to conclude the following:
A) Since, if anybody recall – the government does not want to guarantee minimum returns (to the Dayak shareholder) for the JV, and since the government still place the onus on the NCR land owners to provide proof of ownership beyond mere claims be the rightful owner – the government had not exibit …
—————————————————————————————————-
‘trustees twice over’ (Finn 1992: 243), particularly where the vulnerable landowners depend on it to negotiate the best terms on their behalf (Lehane 1985: 98).
—————————————————————————————————-
…and by Section 29(1) and (2) of the Government Proceedings Ordinance 1956 …
Therefore there does not exist any evidence of fiduciary duty … since the trustee can’t be held accountable, and taken to court for breach of trust – to comply with the trust deed.
This mean the very claim of Trustee-ship is called to question. The article deftly maneouver to avoid mentioning it – but thats the conclusion, based on the prevailing law. Frankly, its an eye-opener, that LCDA cannot be sued to be accountable, even if the JV goes broke, and have to offload the land asset to a nominated management agent (without paying anything to the NCR land owners)
B) Given the evidence in Point 1) and Point 2A, I seriously think our gullible Dayak folks may be taken for a ride, in both the legal and economic sense. A misplaced trust in the government had occured – when there was no legal foundation for the Trust. The power of attorney had been given to the Trust,without any trust deed – or demand for fiduciary relationship ! It means, in the worst case scenario, 60 years from now, when the legislature ADUN would be populated by a handful of Dayak representative only (why not, after SCORE – don’t tell me the rural electoral features will remain predominantly Dayak),lawyers for the NCR land owners would argued in vain, to reclaim the land for their Dayak clients. Sad.
And incidentally, today in BP – RISDA express interest to plant rubber in the 1 million odd hectare of NCR land.Does it not bother you, that the NCR land owners were never mentioned or factored into the conversation between the government, and corporations from West Malaysia ?
Most importantly: does it not make you think that the individual Dayak NCR land owner should be given land title – URGENTLY, since the vulchers are already circling, and sooner or later – will be going in for the kill. I hope Telaga Kumang does not represent the vulchers …or even BN for that matter.
Telaga Kumaing- Telaga alai semua TAI/SHIT betakong and what do we expect from kolam tauka pegong TAI SHIT. Always smell like SHIT SHIT. Aram CI ktai muai tai ngagai Telaga Kumang.
My personal suggestion, “BANSA NARCISSISM” (BN)
Let me candidly describe for you the meaning of “narcissism” as stated in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism herein;
The term narcissism refers to the personality trait of egotism, which includes the set of character traits concerned with self-image ego.
The terms narcissism, narcissistic, and narcissist are often used as pejoratives, denoting vanity, conceit, egotism or simple selfishness. Applied to a social group, it is sometimes used to denote elitism or an indifference to the plight of others.
The name “narcissism” is derived from Greek mythology. Narcissus was a handsome Greek youth who rejected the desperate advances of the nymph Echo. As punishment, he was doomed to fall in love with his own reflection in a pool of water. Unable to consummate his love, Narcissus pined away and changed into the flower that bears his name, the narcissus.
Are you being abused and emotionally drained by a narcissist?
Let me give you some thought on how to deal with a narcissist is to know a little about how they think. The next two (2) scenarios will give you a good idea of the thought patterns of a narcissist.
Scenario 1: “I know that I’m better than most of those who surround me, although I’m not quite sure of the points of difference between myself and them, still I know that I’m much better than them.
Other people seem to be weak, vulnerable and helpless. Most of them fail to succeed, the majority of them are depressed and the rest do not know where life will take them”.
Scenario 2: “I’m not like these people and that is why I should be on the top, that is why I should be in the center of attention and that is why I should outperform them.
Yes, it’s all about ‘me’ Never about ‘you’ or ‘them’, except as inferior beings”.
Firstly, the best line of attack to deal with a narcissist is to recognize your own narcissistic tendencies.
When your own feelings of self-worth are dependent on what others think or feel about you, you make yourself vulnerable to any narcissist’s trap.
Secondly, try to have a safe haven, a place to avoid the abuse, and retain control of your own person and your own life.
Thirdly, get as far away from them as you can. Hardcore narcissists are sometimes unbearable to deal with. Sometimes you just have to walk away.
Cheers!
AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN…..Hooo….Haaa…..!!!!
Dayakbaru – Meramat Tajak has written a very good piece of article of his understanding on the JVC model using “trust” as an instrument.
The English used might be difficult to understand by some of us.Can anybody translate that into Iban for people in the long house to understand.
Sebedau involve JV, any iban must make sure the land involved must be totally his even after 60 years tenure has expire. NCR without any proper document could disappear from the original owner even before the JV expires. Title is the only way to have the rightful owner to the land. Any other document is invalid and may not be able to help one to claim back his land after expiry date of JV. It’s better that the land must have a proper record in the L & S rather than being kept in the JV company file. Or otherwise, don’t involve inthe JV at sll.
From: MJC 11/3/2013
To: DL Bloggers & Supporters,
Besides informing the rural voters of the fact that DB is a mouth piece of opposition PKR and that what are being written or expressed in this blog are not reflective of the Dayaks community overviews, DL bloggers are encourage to engage the following strategy:
1) Come election time kindly impress upon the voters / longhouse folks that : if they are against BN gomen that would mean they are also against the Police, The Resident, The District officers, the teachers, the Nurses, Kerani Opis Welfare, headmen, councilors, Penghulu and all the gomen offices and officers.
2) Kindly impress upon the Headmen, Councillors, Pemacha, & Penghulu that they are under gomen pay-roll………and not supporting the gomen would mean their post taken away, no grant and no hand-out.
3) Longhouse JKKK is to report any visit from the opposition (DB included) to any of the DL ad hoc committee. Ensure that they (DB) fill-in the register book to facilitate proper identification.
Happy campaigning!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tax payers money my friend-we are all taxpayers.No government servants are not paid their salaries in the states of Kelantan,Kedah,Selangor and Penang which at the moment are under the OPPOSITION.
Do not CONFUSE others just because YOU are CONFUSED yourself.You are LYING AGAIN.THERE YOU ARE!
Dear Honorable DB,
Updated: 12/03/2010 – 11:43 AM
My Personal Words of Legal Advice: “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT”
Firstly, if you’re a landowner and not yet a partnership of the “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT”, please kindly avoid getting involved in such scheme.
Secondly, if you’re a landowner and you’re already in the “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT”, as stakeholders you’re advice to review all your legal and trust deed agreement with your lawyer(s). Take necessary legal steps if there’s any known “Criminal Legal-Deed Discreprency ” or “Criminal Breach of Trust” and/or “Criminal Breach of Contract” and “Breach of Promise”.
Thirdly, the evidences/exhibits on the ‘SKIM MUNOH RAYAT” are clear today that there’s no guarantee on which the ‘individual landownership’ would be legally returned to the landowners after the JV 60 years leasehold had expired.
Fourthly, the ‘unit trust’ do not offer a fixed rate of return, it fluctuate, and the return on your investment is not guaranteed (kindly read the terms and conditions in your unit trust form/agreement).
Fifthly, if you’re forced and/or threatened to sign and/or someone has false/forge your signature/signatory or any form of discrepancy or abuse of power without your will/formal authorization then you’re advice to lodge a police report and seek a legal opinion from a reputable lawyer to pursue on your case.
Sixthly, if for any reason you’re conned or duped and/or misled by others (YBs, Tuai Rumahs, Penghulus, Councillors, Pemanchas and others) to join the “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT”, you’re advice to lodge a police report and seek a legal advise from a reputable lawyer to pursue on your case. This may includes some witnesses and other relevant evidences to back-up your legal case.
Seventhly, if you’re promised and/or asked to sign a legal document(s) – please kindly read it thoroughly first (takes 2-3 days or more to study it) and/or refer it to your lawyer to study and evaluate every sentence or clause stated in the said documents which must be an advantage and/or in favor of you. You’re nothing if you’re landless!
Eighthly, if you’re signing an agreement and/or contract please make sure you have a witness, it must be sealed and legally notarized. Blank contract/agreement ie without a seal/notarize is only a piece of blank ‘toilet’ papers.
Ninthly, others may include the followings;
a) We have to sign contract(s)/agreement(s) when we are making some purchase(s) and/or partnership or Joint-Venture or others, such as, buying a car, a house or leasing a land/property or whatever is legal engage. It is very important to read the fine prints or you may give away your rights. Just like your vote right!
b) Before you sign a contract, make sure that you take some time to read it carefully. Put your glasses on, or use a magnifying glass, to see the fine prints, if necessary. Once you sign it, you are entered into a binding legal agreement. Any oversight and/or overlook might cost you a ‘big be-by-gone’ my friend. Any contract and/or agreement is a very serious legal matter (anang main-main); trust no one but yourself and also to think of your next generation, not just today!
c) Make sure the contract states the cost and/or date of delivery or payment or any other that is necessary to insert in the contract/agreement which you might think of your advantage/favor/benefit.
d) Certificates of deposit (CD) and/or Unit Trust Share Certificate (UTSC) and/or Leasehold JV 60 Years Certificate (JVC): Whenever you open a CD/UTSC/JVC, let the bank and/or your legal advisor or nominated accountant and others as it deem necessary and fit know that the CD/UTSC/JVC ‘should not be rolled over’ without your official consent and/or approval. Many banks and/or institutions or private party automatically roll over a CD/UTSC/JVC even if the interest rate has dropped. When you’re involved in a JV or any business for that matter, you need to know the legal aspects and risk factors!
e) Do not sign up for a JV partnership when you’re on the loosing end; your YBs are good politico actors (Remember this words: “I couldn’t recall…”, “Did I say it…?”, “You misconstrue my word….”. and so on) unless they can personally guarantee and/or legally guarantee you.
f) Make sure that the contract/agreement offers you the right to cancel the JV partnership (exit clause where there is a breach of contract or default or any known breach of legal contract/agreement) or discrepancy or abuse of power, and receive a refund and/or necessary legal damage claims.
g) Do not sign a “demand agreement” and/or “unconditional agreement” or “transferable agreement” and/or “transferable deed of trust” or “assignable agreement/trust”. In this kind of agreement can order you to lose your asset or land/property and/or other benefits at any time.
h) Strike out clauses that allow a partnership to terminate your rights and/or benefits or your advantage. It must be of mutual understanding, win-win and benefit or no deal!
i) Before Signing a Promissory Note or Deed of Trust, kindly read both documents, including the pre-printed portions or drafts. You might ask the closer to send you a ‘blank format’ deed of trust and promissory note beforehand. Because preparers are human made and can always make mistakes or typo mistakes, here are the important items to review:
• Spelling of trustee/partnership/trustors’ names and any other names; including it legal status/address
• Principal and objectives of contract/agreement
• Interest rate (and the rider, if adjustable)
• Related amount and/or payment amount, and any others if any
• Prepayment penalties or other penalty clause, if any
• Address of NCR Land/asset/property including date, time, photos, maps and other relevant evidences, if any
Basic info: What is a Deed of Trust?
If you have never read a ‘deed of trust’, you might have questions about it. After all, it is the security for your collateral or loan or others in relation to the JVC. It is the document that is recorded in the public records.
A deed of trust contains three (3) or more parties: (in this NCR Leasing Scenario)
• The Trustor, which is you, the landowner/asset holder/stakeholder.
• The Trustee, which is an entity that holds “bare or legal” title eg. Pelita Holding Bhd or others as specify in the agreement
• The Grantor, which is the State Government (ie if such project/JV is promoted and/or guarantee by the State Government or otherwise the YB concerned)
• The Beneficiary, which is also you – the landowner/asset holder
• Others as it deemed fit and necessary in JV Agreement
The deed of trust is an instrument that identifies the following:
• Original unit trust and/or investment amount
• Legal description of the land/property being used as security for the “JV mortgage” or others
• The parties
• Inception and maturity date
• Provisions of the mortgage and requirements or others
• Late fees and/or other fees
• Legal procedures
• Others as it deemed fit and necessary
NOTES:
***IF YOU ARE NOT YET IN THIS “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT” – TRY TO AVOID THIS SCHEME AND WAIT FOR A NEW “NCR LAND ACT” AND “LAND REFROM” TO BE PROMOTED BY DB!
***LAND IS LIFE – IF YOU’RE WITHOUT A LAND, YOU’RE NOTHING!
***DON’T BE “BANSA ORANG SETINGGAN SARAWAK” (BOSS) BUT THE REAL BOSS TO THE GOVERNMENT!
CHANGE WE MUST – WE CAN CHANGE OUR WORLD!
Leka ka nangka tu dulu bala kaban DB…..
AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…..Haaa…..!!!!!
gkm2020,
Please continue on with your clarification whenever you are ready with your write-ups. We are sure these comments from you and others like Ramy Bulan would benefit our community where many are usually prone or subject to exploitations by certain unscrupulous people. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
We DB rely on educated and dedicated people like you for important information just to safeguard our society /our community from being cheated or robbed of our scarce resources.
ONCE BEATEN TWICE SHY,TWICE BEATEN BETTER DIE!!!!
DL,
Well. Good luck in your strategies to counter DB in this coming SE. I am impressed by some of the things DL group would like to employ to woo the folks’ votes. They are nothing new to us. They are so familiar. You people have been winning because the Ibans still subcribe to BN ideologies ingrained in the mind.
However, DBs strongly believe that the BN ideologies preached by Dayaklama group will be weakened in due course as more and more Ibans could comprehensively understand our reasons for the fight.
We hope that there is light at the end of the tunnel. WIth God’s grace, the time will definitely come when every Iban family manages to have one or two of its siblings who could obtain reasonably good education to see what’s going with the Iban community.
In fact, there have been cases whereby children of the TRs ,Penghulus, Councillors, Pemanchas and so forth have obtained tertiary education, coming back to the longhouse persuading them to review their blind loyalty towards the BN government.
The children of these leaders have seen the tyranny of the government towards the Ibans, especially those living in the longhouse.
The children of these leaders also apparently have some influences over their family members, resulting in the TRs to withhold their eagerness to rally a support behind any BN candidates.
Perhaps we could safely say that the younger generations of our Iban leaders have had enough of the BN’s endless marginalisation of their own people. They now dare to say that there are numerous misdeeds of the government led by YDK to traumatise their concsience.
DL,
It will not stop within the family of these TRs only. The folks in the longhouse look agreeable with the children. And that’s not all as their relatives are also going against the continued killing of the Ibans.
Hence, DL, do you still want to force these TRs to support the BN or don’t you think they prefer to listen to their own children?
Whenever possible, DBs must also join in the JKKK. We need to work from within this JKKK to stop the like of Dayaklama.
We are sure that DBs, esp if you are a son of a TR, can influence their own family members and relatives to re-evaluate the reasons for voting the BN. We can also approach the children of other Iban leaders in the government to counter Dayaklama accusations.
Hopefully, by working within the families of our Iban leaders, we will nullify DL’s efforts.
We shall fight for our rights as nobody else will be doing it for us. Our YBs prefer to be silent and rather hopeless. Please do not be scared of their tactics as the Ibans have never been dead for voting against the goverment.
In DBs point of view, there is no place for people advocating PERINTAH MUNOH RAKYAT policies.
Cheers…
If like this when we can start plant the palm tree? Everybody have their own ideas how to optimize the land so that it will give a good return to the natives. BN formula is straight forward and just want these lands generate economy for the natives and at the same time will increase the GDP.
What is needed is to convince the developer to come with money, and the natives to surrender their land and everything inside it for bulldozers to start with the ground works. If the palm tress bear fruits and after deduction on operating cost the money will be divided according to the proportion in the agreement. This is the agreement.Simple why need a professor and doctorate degree to outline what need to be done.
Upon expiry of land tenure in 60 years and if natives choose not to continue with the planting of palm trees, they can breed cow on his land. The cows can graze on the pasture of this huge land. The population is double by this time and the demand for cow’s meat is increasing and so why worry.
For those who opt and have the mean to turn this land into sport stadium can also do so. Now the education ministry is making sport compulsory in school and by this time we can produce a world class athletes. There are always sports competition going on all over the places. The land owner can also be made rich through sales of ticket.
Don’t make it so complicated DB’s and what is most important the works on the NCR must started and we cannot afford to continue talking on the planning and stuck at the planning stage years after years.
If you think your formula is not workable, well why not turn to the gomen and seeking advise.
Salam 1Malaysia.
Thank you gkm2020. Agree with PUP, continue on with our struggling!
Hi…gkm2020…how about organize something as to take up the case over the breaching of 18/20 points agreement by Malaya to International Court of Justice. Let the independent internatoional body give judgement.
For us we can talk, but it is better to have a solid confirmation. What do you think?
Nya aja mandi…gkm2020.
There again you go Merakat Piun. What case that you have and cannot be settled with the local courts? Unggal GKM already have something that he submitted to the international body on one subject that we discussed here earlier on. It’s quite confusing while he trying to have native court to settle most issues but turn his back and prefer his former colonial master to resolve issue.
If DB have that much money might as well stand for the coming Sarawak state poll or just join develop the NCR.
Salam 1Malaysia.
Why bother to plant OP that requires so large an area? The crop is very very very labor and machinery intensive! I think the objective of such OP JV is nothing else but to take NCR to a slowly dying ownership. And it would be the same for the rubber planting that is going to be introduced by RISDA in to the State. The RISDA target the NCR but in similar approach as the OP JV. What objective behind the stone it has to do so? Why seems to be not sincere? The RISDA can provide anak getah to the farmer; the tapper sell rubber; therefore the govt too can benefit as well. In the same way, the OP smallholders sell their OP and the MPOB/govt can also benefit as well.
I think, their target is you know lah!!
Enti nupi ngot, it would only take a 30m x 30m space as compared with almost an acres to plant an OP.
What about nupi ikan keli? It would only take about 2m x 2m for 100 ikan keli. It’s doesn’t require big space.
If one raise a china doll, it only need a single bed bedroom to keep her – one shot RM200. Just imagine if she entertains at least 10 customers per day.
So, the moral of the story….be careful with large scheme that involve JV; it’s better to go for the small scheme, like the sice of a china dolls scheme.
I think someone really need to translate what Meramat Tajak wrote above in Iban/BM for easier comprehension.
Kick out BN,Dayak YBs included since they have proven incapable of protectting Dayaks rights, and Dayaklama as well.( presume dayaklama uses multiple identities , then kick all dayaklama out!)
I totally agree that JVC is ‘SKIM MUNOH RAKYAT/DAYAK’.
Nya meh ke ngasoh sida ba negeri ke besai baka Kuching tu ka agi bejalaika bisnis ke enda begunaka ruang ke besai. Just distribute bisnis card and the bisnes would come.
I think someone really need to translate what Meramat Tajak wrote above in Iban/BM for easier comprehension. Education is our survival to know our rights and protect them.
dayaklama, can you show any prove that the ‘trust’ mentioned in the article above has helped in returning the NCR land to their rightful owner after the contract expired? dayaklama can always run from real issues but one day DB will catch you for you have no place to hide!
I totally agree that JVC is ‘SKIM MUNOH RAKYAT/DAYAK’.
dayaklama on March 11th, 2010 6:14 pm
Hello Dayaklama,
For a moment there, I thought this posting must be the evil genius work of gkm2020, Dr JBA, Akih Empangop, ES, CI, MAP, PUP, PE,PRPR engkerawai, anakuli,UM – and all your sworn enemies!!!
You are ruining BN in the cheapest way possible with post like that !!! Are you sure Jabu, Mawan, JJM would have approved of this posting ? Yes/No ?
Oh, I have an idea – a little thought experimet for you: what if you publish this posting in Borneo Post and broadcast it in RTM (in all Dayak dialects) so that everyone will know ?
If you think it will stand to the scrutiny of smart readers and listeners out there …then, you can safely assume your bosses would have approved …
Holy cow, don’t tell me you had that post reviewed and approved by Jabu??
Don’t get flustered…. You do have some balanced postings, where I would silently agree with some of them, and where I don’t agree – I would still understand the thinking behind it.
This is not your best posting… but I did had a good laugh at it, and that’s probably quite the opposite of what you intended …
I had the same perception as yours, Dayak Lama.
Model:
a. Intake outside fund & Technology,
b. Use local land and labour.
c. Give 30% dividends to locals.
I used to discuss this with officials from Pelita. No one had other dissenting ideas on the total maximisation of land use. There were times I had to discuss this late into the night with some Dayak ministers.
But we had no idea about other aspects of Sarawak – ie the frequent land reforms in the legislative council. Just an example:
1. While LCDA is the trustee on behalf of the government and the land owner, what assurance is that trust deeds unchanged within the next 60 years? Did you not realise that that the word Dayak at one time, was almost obliterated from the dictionary?
2. You must also be sure that the descendants of Dayak D can transfer valid wills to his children in future.
I am not trying to split hairs here, but the focus of this Dayak Baru all the while is that Dayak state representatives are very reluctant to speak on behalf of the land owners.
If the legislative council propose laws, as it has all these while, that neglect the interest of the Dayaks – what assurance do we have that greed and their personal positions don’t take precedence over Dayak interests?
After 60 years, as you said, the Dayak can rear cows – this is a fallacy. If they can rear cows after 60 years, why are they not rearing cows now? The answer is simple: it is illegal.
All agriculture projects have to be approved by the SPA (aka CM). To rear more than 50 pigs is against the state law.
To legalise it, you need the Vet Department and EI report – both require proof the land is yours. Showing proof is none other than a valid land title.
10 years ago I tried to venture into various agriculture activities in the state. We met various huddles – and each can only be met if “Jumpa menteri kita.” That answer made me vomited. Rasuah at every corner, so sapa chakap ta’da rausah?
Let me say, NO DAYAK would protest and go to court if the JVs are on sincere, honest and fair terms. Don’t you insult our intelligence. Here I want answers:
1. How much are the longhouse people paid while they work there? Does it meet the minimum wage rate imposed by WTO?
Does it meet the Plantation Union Agreement with the Federal Government? In some plantation that I know, some people are paid RM13 a day – and that alone is enough to suggest exploitation of the locals.
2. Is there any minimum safety precaution for workers that handle weedicides and pesticides? Is there any SOCSO paid?
3. EI report that seems stringent for people like me – is the same standard being applied to these plantations? Don’t you see our rivers are depleted of fishes?
These are beyond politics; nothing to do with BN or PR. These are issues affecting my Dayak people, my own kinsmen. BN has rule for 47 years, now if they have been fair – what stupid people want to criticise and write in blogs like this?
As I said, Sarawak Opposition is the creation of Sarawak inefficient and corrupted BN. Dayak nationalism is the result of pathetic Dayak ADUNs and MPs – Ming Court is the clearest proof. If we don’t speak for the Dayaks, who else?
Remember the words of Pastor Martin Mueller:
“THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communists.
THEN THEY CAME for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.
THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.
THEN THEY CAME for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant.
THEN THEY CAME for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.”
Finally remember Malays Nationalism, Perkasa & Ibrahim Ali.
Di tulis MERAMAT TAJAK March 11, 2010 Jam 3.54 pm Lalu di terang dalam jako iban oleh Kelingmenua1
Semua,
Aku oleh meriti ka kabuah racana kutu-kutu ti di tulis Telaga Kumang ka maioh agi nya pesan ianya nyerang ari ti nganatai ka pesan. Pesan nya bisi mai ka rumah bisi mai kunci kerpercayan (meng-achur merosak ka point TK enti di peda ia bakatu:-
1. Nyin ya, utai ti amat-amat betul deka ngancur tanah ia ti nadai pala NCR ti di kena konsep BAKONGSI ia ti melibat ka agensi pemerintah ti udah nya ngasoh “siti ari semua (Balat nekul) per-aturan hakmilik udah ti lepas 60 taun. Hal-hal undang-udang di sarara bunyi ia macam babelit-belit, Tang aku fikir, enti ia baka ti di panduk tak nyau babuih ka baruh ari setiap tempat.
Section 7A AKTA Tanah nyendiaka sida medaftar ka tanah adat asal tang enda nyedia ka kemaia tanah nya di kosong ka lalu nyerah ka surat pala tanah. Baka jako FONG’S, nya semina di gaga bakanya aja dikena penemu di ka ngalim ngaggai tanah sampai menua tu di kelala lalu terbukti bisi sijil ti betul, enggau ukai pemilik ia ti betul ba tanah’,
Ba penemu aku, tu madah ka 2 perkara:
A) Undang-undang ti nyebut –nerang ka DAYAK ti enggau masuk sempakat bakongsi, melibatka Agensi pemerintah enggau kompeni ti ngati kadiri, nya semina meri klim sida ngaggai tuan tanah – tu mega ngamedis lalu terang benar nyunjok ka klim sida ti ba-empu tanah tu endang semua jalai sampai tanah pejanjian bakongsi nya udah abis timpoh. Keterang jako ti di tabur ka tuai-tuai DAYAK bisi madah ka, Gran pala tanah nya sigi nadai grantee di beri pulai ngaggai sida ba-empu tanah (baik ka sida ti enggau ba skim tu ti bakongsi sama JV.
Enti bisi tambah ari segi udah ti nga-sah lalu terang madah ti nyunjok ka sida meh orang ti ba-empu ka ia (Ba keterangan mega maioh sekeda raban enggau bukti siko-siko serta antara tanah sida siko-siko deka lenyau ari kerja-kerja penanam ..jadi jako ti di pasut ka Dr. Bulan nya sigi amat dalam betu, serta masuk akal serta manah.
B). Enti bala pembaca nya bisi enggau nasib ti enda manah nyerah ka tanah NCR sida ngaggai kosep bakongsi JV ngemasang ka tanah, sida patut nyinkang lalu nyendia ka surat-surat antara sida sama-sida ti enggau orang ti ba-skim lalu ngadu antara tanah diri empu, ari ti ngelak tauka nganti ka kompeni JV tauka orang ke tiga ti nyukat tanah (Ti selalu benar cara sida meri alasan tauka macam-macam tegal ti kena nyeliah) Surat nya tadi sida ia tau nyedia ka tauka lalu ngadu ka surat sumpah ngaggai lawyer ti di saksi ka tuai raban bangsa baka sida Tuai Rumah, Pengulu, Pemancha, Hal tu ukai sebaka enggau pala tanah, tang ko aku – nya lebih manah ti oleh nulong di kumbai JC Fong’s Claim hakmilik’’,
2. Bakani ko peranan Agensi pemerintah tu dalam kompeni Bakongsi ti nyadi wakil ba JV mega nyimpan maioh tanda tanya ti enda oleh saut. Ti nydai ka jako cermah semina ngujong ka “Ngarap” nya
……Nyin ia pangawa ditu ti nya tanya (Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s (1995) berhati meh “ wajar nya prinsip enda deka niteh ka pangawa ti ngamasang ka tanah lalu undang2 ba pangawa dagang…kebijakkan, … tang baka peminta ti bakanya, sama deka bafikir ka utai ti ngamedis ka ati!. Utai ti endang udah di kemasang baka bunyi alat musik ti ngalah ka bekali-kali pansik mega enda nunjok ka pengering nyadi ka semua alat musik nya endang ngalah pemetul nya meh ngaku penunjok ti nagang.
Tu meh meri aku berunding lalu ngeluar kena ngujong ka ia bakatu:
A) Laban, Ngaggai semua orang udah enggau ba-skim tu – Bala pemerintah endang enda deka jadi penjamin tauka Grantee ti ka pulai ngagggai tahap ti paling mimit (Ngaggai pemegai Syer bala Dayak) ka pangawa ti begulai, JV Lalu kenyau ari sida pemerintah ti udah ninggal ka tanggong jawap ba tanah NCR dia pemilik deka nunjok ka bukti sida meh orang ti ba-empu ka tanah ti nunjok ka sida mega ti deka ngambi alih sebagai orang ti berhak – Perintah endang nadai nunjuk….
B) —————————————————————————————————-
Pewakilan kedua kali (Finn 1992:243), khusus ngaggai dini alai tanah ti barega sida ti empu tanah nya endang begantong amat ngaggai tawar menawar ti pulai ngaggai ni ia ka paling manah ba pihak sida (Lehane 1985:98).
… lalu ba seysken 29 (1) enggau (2) atur pemerintah ba peraturan 1956…
Ari nya dia nadai bisi keluar ni bukti ti ngadai tanah ngaggai pagawa ti begulai ! ti di kerja… ari nya sida wakil enda oleh di pertanggong jawap ka, lalu enti di bai ngaggai court ti madah ka sida ngalangar perjanjian sebagai orang ti dipercaya – ti niteh ka wakil pembuat.
Reti nya setiap klim ti ngaggai perwakilan ti di pangil jadi tanda tanya. Tu meh article ti tangkas ti amat lichik, pandai enggau penuh akal ti ngajaoh ti di sebut dia – tang nya meh pengujong, enti niteh ka undang-undang ti di sebar ka enggau luar.
Enggau terang, nya meh pemuka mata, inya LCDA enda oleh di saman ti jadi ka tanggong jawap, sema ia Kompeni JVC nya brankrap, lalu pindah ka barang-barang tanah hakmilik lalu nama ka pengurus ajen (Ti enda iboh mayar nama utai ngaggai sida ti empu tanah NCR)
B) Meri bukti ngaggai point 1 enggau point 2A, Aku enggau naka oleh bafikir ka nerang ngaggai kitai raban bangsa Dayak ti mudah di tipu lalu di tiki, ba pangawa ti babau ekonomi enggau ba-bau menurut udang-udang.
Enti salah alai ngengkah ka pengarap ti ngaggai pemerintah oleh terjadi leban ti nadai teras undang-udang ka perwakilan. Kuasa tuan akim nya udah di beri ngaggai perwakilan ti nyadi ka perbuatan perwakilan – tauka endang deka ngadai kerja sama! reti nya, ba kes ti nyadi 60 ari diatu, leboh rangang undang di pindah ADUN ti udah di cemar ba jari pengari Dayak aja (Lapa enda udah SCORE – Enda iboh madah ka aku pengundi menua persisi deka lebih manah agi lalu ningal ka DAYAK amat terkenal), Lawyer ka NCR ngari ka tuan tanah majak belaban nyau jadi sia-sia ti deka nuntut tanah sida pulai baru ngaggai bala Dayak.
Pia mega terjadi saritu ba BP (Borneo Post) – RISDA bisi madah ka sida ia beminat deka nanam getah ba satu juta hectar tanah NCR amat tekejut meda nya, Bisi ka enda tu ngacau nuan, ianya Tanah NCR enggau pemilik ia nadai bisi madah ka kabuah nuan, jako randau sida ia ti enggau pemerintah serta enggau koperasi ari senanjung Malaysia?
Lebih penting agi: Nya mega nadai fikir ka tanah NCR siko-siko bala Dayak ti di beri pala tanah – Enggau lengkas, Semenjak Vuclher ti udah bapusing-pusing, lalu pengujong ia tauka udahnya – Bisi ka enda ianya pulai ngaggai PEMUNUH. Jadi aku arap ka TELEGA KUMANG nya ukai ngari ka Vulcher… tauka raban sida BN ka pekara nya.
Jako Mermat Tajak ti di salin ngaggai Jako Iban. Minta Ampun bala pembaca enti sema salin aku enda tentu datai. Lalu minta Ampun mega ngagga Mermat Tajak enti sema jako nuan di salah salin. Laban jako dia dalam-dalam.
Terima kasih semua OOOOO HAAA Agi Hidup agi ngelaban.
Unggal kelingmenua1,
Thanks for your kind efforts on English – Iban Translation by Unggal MERAMAT TAJAK’s article dated March 11, 2010 Jam 3.54 pm.
But whatever, whichever and however it is, I/we appreciate your positiveness in helping us all to translate our DB articles into Iban language. Keep up the good work my friend.
NOTES:
If for any matter there’s some typo or mixed Malay in it, I believe it’s better than nothing. Don’t blame no one, I/we can blame the BN for not providing us our own “SEKOLAH RENDAH/MENENGAH/KOLEJ BANTUAN DAYAK”.
Why the Chinese and Indian communities can have theirs and why NOT us!!!!! Maybe East Malaysia is not West Malaysia or Dayaks are always regard as “Others” or bangsa “Dan Lain-Lain” and/or “others” could also means “aliens” (from another planet) – that’s disgrace and total racial discrimination!! Or intended ethnic classification strategy to erase our identity and entity and/or our “Native Rights”!!!
We must forward with “Change WE Must” objectively. Keep-up the good work my friend. Terima kasih madi!
Cheers!
We have enough air pollution,here come some one trying to “pollute” the Iban language…..what we called bahasa rojak….causing more confusion than the Red Indian language!
Well written Kaban ES. I suggest this article should be also translated into Iban. Let our rural brothers and sisters understood by themselves what the realities are and not listenng to those proganda by Dayak lama and BN.
Kaban Tinin anak Tinjau….sorry to disagree with you here for now …but instead let us focus on how to dissiminate and spread the message to our rural brothers and sisters
You know I am ashamed to share that we speak Iban every day in my family but the standard is very poor…but what I see is more critical for now is get ourselves connected and communicated with outside world.
Nya aja kaban.
Dayaklama
Aku sigi lama dah kempin ba menua kami
tiap kali ku bisi cuti (setaun 2 kali)
aku selalu mai kami serumah begelumu
lalu mai sida iya anang ngundi BN agi
Diatu kira kira 90% kami serumah dah
nitih ke aku.
Tuai Rumah kami nadai olih nagang kami
serumah agi laban penemu ia nadai di
dinga kami agi kira ke dah di tungging
ke kami burit.
Kami dah ngasai ke pemerinsa idup.
ENTI DAP BEDIRI BA SITAK KRIAN ILA
KAMI NGUNDI DAP, ENTI PKR KAMI NGUNDI
PKR ENTI SNAP KAMI NGUNDI SNAP
ENTI BN WE’LL SAY NO!
anakuli on March 12th, 2010 8:28 pm ….
continue with your good work…education and awareness on the root causes of our issues eg.the non compliance of the 18/20 points agreement by Malaya, the abuse of State BN on our NCR land
..In the ooming election…win or loose is not important for now….education and awareness of issues will conquer all…
Nya aja kaban..
gkm2020 on March 12th, 2010 2:55 pm Unggal kelingmenua1,
Thanks for your kind efforts on English – Iban Translation by Unggal MERAMAT TAJAK’s article dated March 11, 2010 Jam 3.54 pm
…………………………………………..
All credit must be given to Unggal KelingMenua1 for his translation work.I have copies of comments in Iban language for the reading pleasure of my family members and relatives back in the longhouse.
Your effort has made a world of good in our Nttempt to disseminate the misdeeds of the BN government in Sarawak, particularly the plights of the Ibans as a whole.
DBs must work along this line as Dayaklama and group have really made use of the weakness in our TR-to-decide-for-all kind of administrative work in the longhouse.This sort of decision making is not fair the younger generation of the anembiak.
KM1, please do not be scared of the typo errors or accuracy of the messages as we could edit them for easier understanding.Hopefully,I have tonnes of articles for circulation within my family and relatives to read.
Good luck and keep up the good work so that we can bring PERINTAH BN MUNOH RAKYAT policy to a halt.
Cheers…
Selamat maca penemu unggal ES ti di kalih ka aku penemu ia ngggai jako Iban,
Minta Ampun bala pembaca semua serta mega ES enti jako aku ti di tulis aku ditu nya ba-rojak-rojak tauka mecemar Blogs DB.
Aku tu siko ari orang ti sinu ati ka kaban belayan bangsa aku ti bedau nemu konsep JVC nya alai enti aku meda sebana enggau penemu ti manah enggau enda manah ti tau di kongsi ngaggai kitai semua.
Aku enggau nangka ulih aku nerang ka pembaca awak ka ia ti kurang benih jako English baka aku oleh nemu serta ngalala penemu ti batang serta manah ti di pansut ka sida ti pandai-pandai ti nyadi ka kongsi kitai semua, jadi aku enda pedis ati ka penemu sekeda pembaca ti nyindir aku.
Jako sida ianya jadi ka peransang aku nulong bangsa awak ka kaban belayan bangsa aku nya tau kering ba-penemu landik lalu betukar penemu niteh ka konsep enggau penemu ti manah ti tau meri bangsa aku senang lalu terima kasih ngaggai DB balanja Blog.
Pia mega terima kasih ka jako puji unggal GKM2020 lalu terima kasih ngaggai penemu ti manah ari ES.
Terima kasih,
Empelesik Sungai on March 12th, 2010 1:53 pm
? Aku endang sama penemu enggau nuan, Dayak Lama.
Modal:
A: Ngambi modal ari luar & Enggau penemu baru teklologi
B: Ngena tanah orang asal lalu enggau pekerja
C: Meri 30% Devidends ngaggai sida menua nya.
Suba aku endang selalu berandau enggau bala sida ti ba opis Pelita. Nadai siko ari sida bisi penemu ti bakanya ti deka ngamasang ka tanah enggau ba-campur-campur utai ti di hasil ari nya. Pia mega aku bisi berandau enggau sida sakeda bala-bala Menteri Dayaks kadang-kadang sampai jauh malam.
Tang kami nadai tulih ka penemu cara ti bukai ba Sarawak – Baka utai ti selalu di sebut ianya ngadu ka tanah lalu meri ia jadi ka undang-undang ba konsil. Enti ambi ka banding:
1. Leboh sida LCDA nya jadi wakil ti ngari ka pemerintah enggau sida ti ba-empu ka tanah, nama insuran ti beri sida ti nyadi wakil nya tadi, ari pangawa sida nya enda nukar perjanjian dia leboh maia ti datai 60 tahun? Lalu pia mega kati ka nuan agi oleh ingat dia jako bangsa Dayak bisi sekali tak nyau deka lenyau ari (dictionary)?
2. Nuan endang ka mega ianya keturun bala Dayak D oleh mindah harta-harta sida ti masih hidup nya pulai ngaggai anak-anak sida jemah ila.
Aku ukai ka magi ka bok aku ditu, Tang aku lebih meri tumpuan ngaggai Dayak Baru lalu pia mega ngaggai pengari Dayak ba cabinet ti jarang amat bajako ngari ka sida ti empu tanah.
Enti maia aum konsil ngeri nya mantai tauka mencadang ka rang undang-undang enggau semua ia ti udah, semua nya endang nadai meri penguntong ngaggai bangsa Dayaks, Lalu pia mega nama insuran ti patut kitai setuju ngambi ka tak enda loba-loba di peda bala penduduk siko-siko, jadi anang meh ngambi deka ngajong ari lebih dulu sebedau berunding lebih ari nama utai ti deka ka DAYAKS?
UDAH 60 TAUN, Baka ke di padah ka nuan, Bala DAYAKS oleh nupi capi dia – Penemu nuan nya amat nesat ka aku (Keliru) tauka Kelakar. Enti sida oleh nupi capi udah lepas 60 tahun, Nama kabuah alai enda nupi capi diatu dih? Saut ngagai pekara tu ianya mudah amat : laban nya enda oleh, enda tau nith ka undang-udang.
Semua projek batupi deka di kemendar oleh SPA (aka CM). Enti ka nupi Babi lebih ari 50 iko pan udah salah laban nya ngalaban undang-udang dalam negeri.
Ngambi orang nya enda di salah ka. Nuan deka ngaggai opis nupi jelu enggau bisi repot ari opis rapa menua ianya kesan ari nuan ti nupi jelu nya. (EI) – Pia mega kedua nuan deka nyunjok ka bukti tanah nya tanah nuan. Ianya nadai cara ti bukai ari ti nunjok ka pala tanah nuan ti agi idup.
10 taun ti udah lalu aku kiroh serta lelak amat laban ti deka ngator pangawa ti bakongsi enggau maioh cara-cara pangawa ti batupi ba menua tu. Kami tetemu ka maioh amat penekul enggau enggau penangul lalu ngujong ka siko ari kami ianya semina oleh betemu menteri enti “JUMPA MENTERI KITA” Saut ia nyau ngasoh aku ka ter-muntah. Makai suap ba setiap segi, Jadi sapa madah nadai makai suap?
Awak ka aku nyebut ia, Nadai bala DAYAK nya ka nyakal lalu mai perkara ngaggai court enti pangawa bakongsi JV nya betul-betul, Jujur, betimbang rasa serta ba- adat. Anang nuan ka ngamalu pelandik kami. Tu meh aku ka nyaut ia.
1. Berapa maioh sida ba rumah panjai nya di bayar leboh sida tu gawa dia? Bisi ka enda sida tu di bayar gaji ti naka ai pengabis mit niteh ka gaji ti kemendar ka WTO – World trade organization – Germpong dagang antara bangsa?
Bisi ka enda tu nith ka perjanjian atur nanam ti niteh ka pemerintah besai? Ba sekada dandang kebun ti di temu aku, maioh sekda orang nya mina di bayar gaji RM13 sari – lalu enti semina nya aja endang enda cukup jadi sida tu semina ngisap darah orang ti bakerja dia.
2. Bisi ka utai ti paling mudah/mimit di titeh dikena nyaga bala penglikun bala pekerja leboh sida ti ngena racun indu utai enggau racun rumput. Bisi ka enda sida tu dilidung SOCSO tauka dibayar?
3. EI –Riport ti ari (pecemaran alam skitar) amat terit tauka keras nya nyunjok ka orang baka aku – Bisi ka enda nya sama-sama (standard) mega ti di pejalai ka ngaggai dadang kebun? Bisi ka nuan meda ikan- ikan ti ba sungai sungai nyau abis?
Tu ukai hal politik; Nadai ba sangkut paut enggau BN tauka PR. Tu meh pekara ti nekul raban bangsa aku DAYAK enggau kaban belayan aku. BN ti udah memerintah 47 tahun, Diatu enti sida tu endang nadai ba-cheping adil enggau sama rata – Nama alai orang ti beli deka ngutok penulis bogs baka tu?
Baka ke di sebut aku, Party penyakal ia ti ba Sarawak nya meh ngaga serta nyedar ka menua Sarawak ti nadai utai ka-oleh serta enda bekesan lalu pangawa ti makai suap bala BN. Bangsa-bangsa Dayak nya meh ti napi pemedis wakil Dayak ADUNs enggau MPs – Ming Court endang udah terang nyunjok ka. Enti kitai enda bajako ka bala Dayak, Sapa dih?
Ingat ka leka jako ketuai gerja Pastor Matin Mueller:
“Sida ia katerubah sida datai nyadi komunisi, lalu aku enda bajako laban aku ukai komunisi.
Jadi sida ia datai laban ke Jews, aku enda bajako laban aku ukai orang Jews.
Jadi sida ia datai laban sida ari raban ari gerampong pekerja tauka dagang, aku enda bajako laban aku ukai orang ti ari gempong nya.
Jadi sida ia datai ari Gerja catholics, lalu aku enda bajako laban aku ari gerja Protestant
Jadi sida datai ngaggai aku, lalu udah nya nadai orang siko tinggal ti ka bajako”
Pengujong ia ingat Melayu nya bangsa Nationlism, Pekasa & Ibrahim Ali.
My honorable friend DB Readers,
I refer to this comment herein: dayaklama on March 11th, 2010 6:14 pm
It’s obvious that DL and his teams (MJC/TK/C4540/arah) have failed and lost their politico BN rhetoric propaganda campaign model to gain and/or regain the mindset of our DB members into their platform.
Cheap, selfish, injustice and dictatorial ‘lama’ way of political scary tactics (politik ngeremba) can’t ‘buy’ the soul of our current generations today.
If BN has failed to proof their 47 years of regimental ministration of injustice, inequality, inequitabilty, transparency, accountability and intolerance; BN will doomed to fail!
Don’t take advantage of the poor and backwardness of others just because you can; don’t take advantage of those who stand helpless in court. The LORD will argue their case for them and threaten the life anyone who threatens theirs.
Don’t promise to be a responsible person/group before and/or during election fiesta only if you can’t deliver your 47 years of testimonial satanic politico policy to discriminate, oppress, marginalize and ‘fixed’ the hopeless poor. The LORD will argue their case for them and threaten the life anyone who threatens theirs.
If you plant the seeds of injustice, disaster will spring up, and your oppression of others will end.
You can’t diffuse an angry mob if you who has started the fire. Never be an accomplish to a devil to move an old property line that your ancestors established.
THE RULE OF JUSTICE
If you promote the rule of injustice, you take away their liberty and rights, including your own and your next generation rights.
The rule of law is not enough if justice is not respected, prejudice, bias and double standard. When a party promote injustice onto their own hands they are master of injustice.
Justice is a concept which has been argued about by philosophers since the beginning of history. A Just nation or government would have a nice balance between the governing class, the management class, and the working class.
Each would be treated fairly for the betterment of the overall society not Just the ‘special few’ and/or ‘special people’ or ‘privilege people’. Similarly, a Just man would harmoniously balance the conflicting desires within himself/herself/themselves so that he/she/they is a fair, good, and happy man.
The concept of justice has always been intimately tied to the idea of fairness, and it has always been associated with the idea of rationality.
Everyone wants to live in a society which is fair. When a case goes before the Supreme Court/ Court of Appeal, the judges (or justices) are expected to rationally deliberate long and hard about the fairest course of action. It’s wrong for judges to be prejudiced.
They pronounce a guilty person innocent and/or denying the legal facts, they will be cursed and hated by the people, and the LORD will judge on them. Judges who punish the gulity, however, will be prosperous and enjoy good reputation.
The opposite of a Just society would be a tyrannical society; probably you have seen one? This would be a society that is ruled by the whims of a single man or a small group of elites who make decisions based on their own self-interest rather than the interest of the society as a whole.
Interestingly, the only way for a truly Just society to exist would be to have a “philosopher king”, a wise man who carefully made decisions based on the interests of the society at large. He didn’t think that a democracy by majority rule was very efficient at making the right decisions. Now, whom the public should turn to when there is an element of injustice in our society or government?
Justice and personal virtue (or morality) are two closely related, but distinct ideas. Justice could be thought of as the morality that we agree upon as a society and make into laws.
Of course, there are endless debates about what these laws should be, and they are constantly changing. One of the most famous moral philosophers, Immanuel Kant, sums it up by saying:
“The duty of virtue is essentially distinguished from the duty of justice in this respect; that it is morally possible to be externally compelled to the latter, whereas the former rests on free self-constraint only”.
Now DL & Group, come to the right path and join us the “Bansa Dayak Baru” here; teach your children on how they should live the right way and they will remember it all their life!
Cheers!
AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa…!!!!
Readers & All
Not quite Unggal Kampua Mee. In football the good coach do not normally change the winning formula. It is not wise for a coach to change the strategy mid stream and most importantly the first 11 should be retained.
Same here, BN leaders found a winning formula which has been in used for the past 47 years…proven efffective & devastating. For 47 years BN managed to win the heart and mind of Sarawak voters so no cause for alarm.
we will continue to deploy this winning fomula in the coming poll perhaps may be with some fine tuning to specifically demoralise DB the like of MT,Dr JBA, Akih Empangop, ES, CI, MAP, PUP, PE,PRPR engkerawai, anakuli,UM, Merakat, RP – and all DL sworn enemies.
Nya Aja Kaban.
.
Unggal Anderson Melintang,
Akai daii…nyau tengok ga tu ninga nuan besebut ka “kampua mee”….auk sapa2 menang ila anang enda melanja makai “kampua mee” madi…
Anang nuan irau madi sigi baka adat bepilih tauka bekempin penemu politik….at the end of the day, the truth will be prevail.
Kalah-Menang sigi adat bepekit dalam segala main ngal…baka orang ka bepekit belagu “American Idol”.
Enti baka hal ‘formula’ ko nuan nya ambi ka sema jako baka “Formula 1″, kitai bela sama-sama bisi formula kediri; nuan ngena ‘formula lama’ – kami ngena ‘formula baru’….empai temu ‘injin lama’ ulih ngalah ka ‘injin baru’ ngal….
DL ngena sistem 47 kuda menya (analog), kami ba DB ngena sistem 47 kuda diatu (digital)….baka injin moto-spit tuaka ‘Steam Horse Power Locomotive Train Versus High Speed-Rail Train (ngena sistem HSR)’.
By the way, don’t give evidence against others without good reason, or say misleading things about them. Do what is right, fair and just; that pleases the LORD more than bringing him/her/them sacrifices.
If you refuse to listen to the cry of the poor and/or the poor peoples, your own help will not be heard. Thank you.
Anang guai demoralize auk….sabar meh nganti kitai sama-sama muai undi ila.
Cheers!
AGI IDUP – AGI NGELABAN….Hooo…Haaa…!!!
Translated from English version to Iban:
Written by: GKM 2020 March 11th, 2010 7:20 pm
Tabi ka ia ti dibasa DB,
Tu jako aku empu ti madah ari segi undang-undang “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT”
Ketubah, Enti nuan nya orang ti ba-empu ka tanah lalu nuan bedau enggau orang masuk pangawa bakongsi ba “SKIM MUNOH RAYAT” Au, jaoh ka diri nuan empu ari ti masuk campur enggau orang ti ba skim bakanya.
Kedua, Enti nuan orang ti empu tanah, lalu nuan udah enggau orang “SKIM MUNUH RAYAT” Lalu nuan ti nyadi pemegai saham dia, Berunding ari jako ajar lalu peda semua hal-hal ti ba undang-undang serta wakil nuan nya di ba surat perjanjian enggau lawyer(s) nuan, ambil meh enggau betul langkah ngaggai undang-undang enti sema dia bisi orang ti kka ngakal/nipu ba cara undang-undang di bisi enda betul tauka orang ti jai cara ia nipu, tauka orang ti jai ti enda niteh ka surat ti udah di janji, tau ka ia ti enda niteh ka jako sepekat”
Ketiga, Saksi/tauka teladan nya bisi nyayan ka ba ‘SKIM MUNUH RAYAT” ti terang benar saritu ianya endang nadai grantee ba siko-siko sida ti empu tanah ‘deka di beri pulai ngaggai sida ia baru enggau cara manah ngaggai sida ti empu tanah enti leboh pangawa ba-Skim bakongsi nya udah abis ba penglama 60 tahun iia nya tanah ti di sewa ngaggai pangawa nya enti ia udah abis timpuh.
Kempat, Pemegai saham nya nadai meri pemberi duit ti tetap, nya endang turun niki, ti di kena mulai ka ungkos nuan nya nadai grantee mega (Peda meh enggau manah lalu baca syarat-syarat perjanjian ba orang saham nuan tauka surat agreement nuan).
Kelima, Enti nuan di pajak tauka di geratak di asoh nyayin tauka oleh orang bukai nya niru tanda tangan nuan tau ka borang nya di tiru, tauka kuasa nya di titehka, ianya nuan empu enda di padah tauka nadai surat nunjuk ka nuan meh ti ngamendar ka orang nya, jadi nuan patut ngaga repot ngaggai balai polis lalu pia mega minta penemu ari sida ba undang-undang ianya ari sida lawyer ti udah terbilang nama ti oleh ngambi kes nuan nya.
Kaenam, Enti sema nuan di tipu tauka di nerima nasib ti enda manah (kena korban) tauka nuan nya salah anggap laban ti ninga sekeda (YBs , Tuai Rumahs, Pengulus, Councillors, Pemanchas tauka orang bukai) ti ka enggau “SKIM MUNUH RAYAT” Nuan mega di patut ngadu ka polis report lalu minta penemu ari undang-undang ari lawyer ti udah ternama ti oleh meda tauka ngambi kes nuan, Tu mega nyangka ka ngamuka ka maioh saksi enggau saksi bukai ti kena nuan nyukong kes nuan.
Ketujuh, Enti nuan di janji ka, lalu nuan di asoh sida ia tanda tangan ba surat perjanjian nya – Baca meh dulu enggau manah serta silik (Ambi masa 2-3 ari tauka lebih kena nuan belajar ka ia) tauka rujuk meh ngaggai lawyer kena nuan belajar lalu awak ka ia oleh nerang ka setiap jako enggau tuju penemu tauka kini tungga tauka tetentuan ti madah ka dalam surat perjanjian nya bisi madah ka kelebihan ngaggai nuan, lalu meri penguntong ngaggai nuan, enti nadai, dia nuan meh orang ti nadai tanah! Jemah ila.
Kelapan, Enti nuan meri tandatangan ba perjanjian nya anang mega enda ingat ianya nuan bisi saksi, lalu semua nya mega mesti deka di cap ba segi undang ti ngesah ka. Enti tak kosong, nadai utai ba kotrak dia, nya macam semina baka kertas kosong ti kena orang engkilu,
Kesembilan, Utai bukai mega deka dikira termasuk utai ti bakatu;
a) Kami udah ngayin sepekat kotrak/perjanjian(s) Jadi leboh ti deka meli(s) utai, baka pangan nuan ti enggau begulai tauka kerjasama, tauka utai bukai, ambil ka banding, meli kerata, rumah tauka nyewa ka tanah/harta tauka nama aja ti besangkut paut enggau undang-undang. Amat –amat beguna maca jako-jako ti alus ti oleh ngambi hak nuan enti ia betul. Baka kitai ti muai undi ti betul!
b) Sebedau nuan ti meri tandatangan ba kontrak nya, perati ka dulu, ianya nuan sepatut ngambi masa lalu maca ia engggau bejimat serta behati-hati. Pasang cermin mata nuan, guna ka glass ti besai ti kena nuan meda tulis ti mit-mit nya, Enti nuan udah nyayin nya, Dia nuan udah masuk ngaggai perjanjian ti ba dalam undang-undang. Enti bisi pan utai silap tauka enda betul, semua nya deka nganusah ka nuan jemah ila, utai ti besai nya udah lenyau, Kaban aku, Ni aja kontrak tauka surat perjanjian nya ukai di kena main-main ba undang-undang (Anang main-main) anang percaya ka orang, tang nuan empu, pia mega fikir ka sida ke rebak baru, ianya keturunan nuan, ukai semina sari tu!
c) Pasti ka enggau betul-betul ba kontrak nya madah ka ongkos ia/ kamaia ari bulan ia ngeluar hasil tauka kamaia sida mayar nuan, tauka utai bukai ti di pasuk dalam kontrak/perjanjian, ti ba runding nuan enggau ia ti oleh nguntong/meri penyamai/meri penyenang ka nuan.
d) Sijil ti simpan dulu (CD) tauka sijil syer (UTSC) tauka Sijil tanah ti di gadai ngaggai JV 60 tahun nama aja utai ti di buka nuan CD/UTSC/JVC, Padah ngaggai Bank serta lawyer awak ka sida tau ngajar nuan tauka juru akuntant ti di padu ka nuan, tauka sida wakil ti endang udah nemu ianya CD/UTSC/JCV ‘enda patut di di tinggal ka, enti enda di kemendar cara (official) ari nuan. Maioh Bank tauka lemaga tauka orang-orang ngati ka diri secara automatic enda ngena ia (Roll over) CD/UTSC/JCV taja pan bungai duit nya nurun (Interest rate drop) laban nuan ti terlibat enggau JV tauka nama aja bisness ti ba-sangkut paut enggau pangawa JV bakongsi. Nuan mesti ka nemu segi undang-undang enggau utai ti ngasoh rugi! (risk factor)
e) Anang nayin sengapa tauka arap ka kaban ba JV, Enggai ka ba pengujong nuan meh ti ornag ti rugi; YBs nuan endang amat pandai bapolitik lalu ba-lakun “Ingat ka leka jako “ Aku enda oleh ngambi ia pulai…”’ Bisi aku nyebut nya…? Nuan deka ngumbai aku salah sebut… lalu baka nya.. Semadi meh sida ia empu nya madah ka nuan aku grantee ngaggai nuan tauka undang-undang pan grantee ngaggai nuan.
f) Peda manah lalu pasti ka enggau manah ba kontrak/perjanjian ti di serah ngaggai nuan, Nuan mega berhak ngincil pejanjiaan kerja sama enggau JV (exit clause) ti bisi enda niteh ka kontrak tauka ia ke enda betul tauka ia ke bisi enda niteh ka undang-undang ba kontrak/pejanjian) tauka di penyalah ka ti ngena kuasa sida, lalu nerima duit, tauka utai bukai ti di beri, tauka ngadu lalu ngalim utai di rosak.
g) Anang nyayin “Perjanjian ti minta” tauka perjanjian nadai ber-syarat”(Peneka ati) tauka perjanjian ti bapindah-pindah” tuaka ngasaoh orang ti di percaya ka nuan lalu nyayin agreement ka nuan” Utai ti baka tu enti nuan setuju ka ia, nuan udah tentu deka lenyau harta, tanah/kerasa tauka utai bukai ti nguntong ka nuan ba sebarang maia
h) Padam ka jako-jako (Clauses) ti meri hak ianya kaban kongsi nuan, oleh mutus ka hak nuan, lalu ti meri pengutong tauka meri kelebihan ngaggai nuan nya sepatut ia di kerja sama, serta ba sapenemu, mujur-mujur serta nguntong tauka nuan enda nyadi enggau orang ba-skim dia.
i) Sebadau nuan nyayin utai ti di janji ngaggai nuan, tauka utai di kerja ka sida wakil, baca meh manah enggau silik-silik setiap leka jako dia, termasuk utai ti deka di cetak, utai ti deka di cadang. Nuan mega patut nanya lalu ngasoh sida ia meri nuan dulu (butir-butir perjanjian) sebedau pangawa ti ka ba sign deka di tangam serta di tandatangan;
• Peda nulis nama-nama sida ti enggau dia, wakil, orang ti enggau bakongsi, tauka nama-nama bukai; termasuk kedudukan alamat lawyer.
• Peda mega prinsip serta tujuan enggau sasaran ba kontrak/perjanjian
• Peda mega (interest rate) ( enti di tiki, enti ia ti ubah)
• Peda mega utai ti besangkut paut enggau penyampau tauka penyampau ti di bayar, enggau utai bukai enti bisi.
• Peda mega enti bisi utai ti deka di bayar kategal ukum tauka ukum ti ba perjanji dia, enti bisi.
• Alamat NCR Tanah/hakmilik/harta termasuk ari bulan, jam, gambar-gambar, kar menua enggau utai bukai ti besangkut paut ti tau nyadi ka bukti enti bisi.
Nerang ka mimit pasal: Nama uti ti di kumbai wakil ti di percaya?
Enti nuan enda kala maca (“Perbuatan orang ti di percaya”) Nuan patut nemu utai ti di tanya ka nuan, bakani dih, Udah nya, nama penglikun ti jaminan loan nuan tauka utai bukai ti besangkut paut enggau pangawa JVC. Nya meh surat ti di simpan ka rakyat
Orang ti di percaya ka nya nyimpan (3) tauka lebih (ba pangawa serta cerita ti nyewa tanah)
• Orang ti di percaya, ianya nuan, Tuan empu tanah/pemegai hakmilik/ pemegai syer.
• Trustee – Wakil, ianya orang ti betul-betul megai “orang ti betangong jawap bejalai ka pangawa
pangawa” baka sida Pelita Holding Bhd tauka sida ti bukai di bisi di tulis ba perjanjian dia.
• Sida ti nyadi (Gator) Nyukong, ianya perintah menua (Baka, enti projek nya bakongsi sama nya meh ti ngasoh serta deka di grantee oleh perintah menua tauka ka YB ti besangkut paut)
• Sapa ti untong, ianya nuan – sida ti empu tanah / tauka sida ti pemegai syer.
• Utai bukai mega deka di perunding ka, enti sida ianya layak lalu di perlu ka ba perjanjian JV.
Orang ti di percaya nya baka enti ia orang di nabah bunyi musik lalu ia di kelala bakatu:
• Asal syer serta penyampau duit ti di labur ka dia.
• Leka jako undang ti di tulis ka, ba pasal tanah/harta benda ti ka di kena jadi ka penglikun ka “JV ti ngadai” tauka hal bukai.
• Orang ti enggau
• Ngadu ka, serta penglama, ari bulan
• Atur-atur ba penyewa serta utai ti di guna tauka utai bukai
• Mayar tauka utai bukai ti di bayar
• Atur undang-undang
• Utai bukai di gaga, ti ka dikena, enggau utai ti di perlu ka
NOTA:
*** ENTI NUAN BEDAU ENGGAU ORANG MASUK “SKIM MUNUH RAYAT” UJI MEH NGAJAOH KA DIRI ARI SKIM TU LALU ANTI MEH UTAI TI BARU “AKTA TANAH NCR” SERTA TANAH TI DI TUSUN BARU” TI DEKA DI BAI OLEH DB!
***TANAH NYA PENGIDUP-ENTI NUAN NADAI TANAH, NUAN DEKA NADAI UTAI!
*** ANANG NYADI “BANSA ORANG SETINGGAN SARAWAK” (BOSS) TANG JADI BETUL JADI TUAN KA PEMERINTAH!
BATUKAR ENDANG KITAI PATUT – KITAI MESTI NUKAR DUNIA KITAI
Leka ka nangka tu dulu bala kaban DB…
Unggal Kelingmenua1
I refer to your English-Iban Translation: kelingmenua1 on March 14th, 2010 7:23 pm
Thank you very2 much. I truly appreciate it very much.
Great and good job; Cheers my brother!
Regards, gkm2020
Anderson melintang,
Are you saying that BN policies for the past 47 years shall remain if BN win the next election?
You mean,STATUS QUO for Malay/UMNO/Ketuanan Melayu/PERKASA and Ibrahim Ali?
Oil royalty from Sarawak,given for free to Semananjung people?
Those are all bad news for DB. Perhaps, sometimes,it is better for you to shut up but on the other hand,you are an exact reflection of Perintah Munoh Rakyat. So, your postings serve as reminders to DB to strive harder!
Jaku Igat Anderson nya endang amat. BN ba Sarawak tu enda kala alah sekumbang 47 taun. Amat manah formula sida BN ditu., nadai endor mantah ga rayat, sigi 2/3 behind BN. Winning BN formula nya usually 2/3 betul, naya kebuah selalu menang 2/3 which is considered very very accurate. Allah equation Einstein neh kaban.
Nya aja kaban.
My idea of Neo-Malaysia!
2-party-system is nice for a country like Malaysia.
Amend the constitution…!!
Change the system of government. We should be ruled by one president with 3 Prime Ministers for Malaya, Sarawak and Sabah.
Is it practical….kaban DB???
The formula shall dismantled the BN autocratic style of governance…
No talibaruts and passengers on board….!!!
Legacy of tok mamut and jayboo will be doomed
Come republican and Democrats in Malaysia.
Little Obama/ little Napoleon!!
Nama jako de kaban???
The Sarawak Land Code 1958
Taken from Article by: Assoc Professor Ramy Bulan
• MERAMAT TAJAK on March 5th, 2010 9:00 pm
• Pembaca DayakBaru
Aku oleh nulis maioh ba perkara tu, Tang ba batang jako ti di randau ka kitai ditu, Aku deka mai bala pembaca mikir ka udang-udang ti mit di ba cerita lama (Sejarah) ti di sebut penulis ba baruh tu:
—————————————————————————————————-
Ambi ka banding, dalam 1994 rang undang-undang nya di ganti serta di persetuju lalu meri kuasa ngaggai menteri tanah ti megai serta ngator hal-hal tanah awak ka ia oleh madamka ka tanah adat hak bangsa.
Ba 1996, Beban enggau tanggong jawap nya ngaggai bangsa asal ti madah ka sida orang ti ba-empu ka tanah dia. Dia orang nya deka mebukti ka, sida meh orang ti empu tanah nya, enti semina sangka aja, nadai bukti dia tanah nya deka di kumbai tanah perintah menua.
—————————————————————————————————-
Nya meh nadai kala enda, meri ati aku pedis setiap kali aku meda ia, Enggau kena aku muka jako:
“Tanah nya tanah perintah, lalu beban enggau tanggong jawap nya *ngalih tauka ngubah* Dayak mesti ka nunjok ka tuntutan sida ka-ujung agi, Menteri Tanah, ti diberi kuasa ti madam ka hak tanah asal”.
Awak ka aku sebut ia baru, nuan udah nemu/merti enggau amat begedi laban ti terang benar pemerintah ti ngubah rang undang-undang nya endang madam/ngincil hak DAYAKS?
Kami arapka sida ia berunding enggau panjai, bala Dayak ti ba luar din – ngambi ka pulai ka penguntong kita semua.
• “Penemu MERAMAT TAJAK” lalu di tambah ka “Cikgu Iban” bakatu ko ia:-
• Cikgu Iban on March 5th, 2010 10:17 pm
• Bisi dih, Tang meh, ba pekara/nentu ka ti ngaga/madah tanah asal ba baruh sekyen 5 (2) ti di atur ngaggai enam bagi perkara; di di namaka:
…………………………………………..
• Asal ja kampong puang enggau alai orang ti di diau ba tanah ianya endang udah terang;
• Ba-tuchuk-tanam ka buah, enggau kebun
• Orang di diau dia ti ngaga hasil ari tanah nya;
• Ngena tanah endor pendam tauka tanah kampong pulau ti laban pengarap dikumbai pertara kitai iban ianya tanah mali, tauka pulau mali.
• Ngena tanah enggau jalai ti patut lalu
• Enggau ni bagi cara undang-undang (Udah ti kencil ba taun 2000)
DBs,
Aku enda berapa ingat, Nyangka semina mimit aja percent DAYAK Ibans nemu semua pekara/tentang semua tu. Ba mula ia, Aku nya siko ari sida. Aku nadai kiroh ka nama utai nyadi ba dunia tu, enggau utai ti di sekiling aku. Aku semina ngira aku empu, ruang bilik aku, opis aku, orang ti sama kerja enggau aku, kaban belayan aku lalu seterus ia. Aku mega enda ka kiroh ka nama utai ti ka di putus ka pemerintah. Udahnya, Nama aja utai di adu ka pemerintah, endang sigi ia adil patut ngaggai semua, jadi aku bersalah, lalu pia mega sida pemerintah pun oleh ngadu utai ti salah.
Bakanya mega, leboh pemerintah ngelepas serta besetuju lalu nganti rang undang-undang sekyen 5 (2) ianya tanah menua (Kod undang2) endang sama ngaggai semua Dayak Ibans, Aku endang nadai bafikir ka penyai ati sida ia serta enggau pengrosak ia, Ba aku, Pemerintah nya endang selau adil, betimbang rasa serta manah, Diatu baru aku sedar,nemu ianya pemerintah nya endang betul-betul enda adil, baceping, adat enggau Ibans.
Enti aku enda silap, Sida ti ngencil enam iti perkara nya, Lalu ngadu ka baru Tanah NCR nya maia leboh bulan lima 2000. Dia bala Ibans ti enggau ati gaga ti deka nyedia ka diri ba rami begawai 2000. Maia nya rang udang-udang nya di persetuju lalu ngecil/madam ka enam iti perkara ti ngaga tanah NCR.
Jadi Ibans ti nemu jangka aku mimit aja, pasal ti ngencil/madam tuaka tipis ti enda nemu laban ti setegal penatai Gawai 2000.
Cara sida ti ngecil tu nya amat nekul/meri kesan ngaggai kitai Iban. Sida ti madam/ngubah ka hak orang asal. Nya meh sampai ka saritu, Aku agi pedis ati laban YABs kitai Ibans, sida endang betul-betul nadai reti ti serta enda olih di karap, nadai matah, nadai ngetan hak kitai. Sida ia tak ngasoh ia lenyau bakanya lalu ngasoh lenyau sengapa. Au, Enti sema ia berlaku/terjadi agi YABs kitai mega ngasoh ia lenyau baru, Au, Kitai Ibans sepatut ia nagang lalu enda ngasoh ia berlaku agi, Laban nya udah terang benar reti ianya nyau hancur kitai semua.
Jadi kena kitai ngalaban/nagang enggai ka ia berlaku kali ti kedua, ka sida ti amat mudah ba-setuju lalu nga-mendar ka rang undang-undang ba pasal tanah adat menua kitai, DBs, patut nyimpan maioh agi penerang/penemu serta madah ngaggai kelebih agi ka sida menua pesisir ti tusah/ti merinsa awak ka sida nemu, Lalu berunding, nama utai ti dikerja permerintah di adil, ti enda baceping, di beri sama rata, pangawa di udah engau ti deka dikerja ngaggai sida menua pesisiri.
DBs, Kasih meh ka kitai Ibans, laban sida tu meh orang-orang ti mudah amat percaya runding/penemu ari sida ti deka amat kemula/nipu enggau janji manis ngaggai bangsa, ianya bangsa ti dalam menua Sarawak. Sida ti deka nipu nya semina bakira lalu barunding kena nguntong/ngaga pengaya ka diri empu aja.
Tulong dani meh ari tindok DAYAK Ibans lalu jaga meh nasib/pengaya nuan, awak ka ia manah/kekal enggau BATUKAR SIGI PATUT ari ti ditingang, kerja/penemu PERINTAH MUNUOH RAKYAT
Naja aja…..